M30 OR M50 WHAT PERFORMANCE ?

Discuss general engine, turbo and supercharger conversions in this section

Moderator: martauto

Shinobi1
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:00 pm

Post Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:32 am

Hi ,i have been planning an m30 conversion but due to trouble at work it looks like i wont be able to do it there :cry: i had thought that maybe an m50 conversion might be a little easier to do outside in the driveway ! just wondered if you guys who had experiance of both might have some idea of the performance difference between the two ?

cheers paul
Widge
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 3661
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Leeds

Post Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:21 pm

S50 :wink: winkeye


Or have you considered a V12 :cool:
Shinobi1
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:00 pm

Post Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:28 pm

Widge wrote:S50 :wink: winkeye


Or have you considered a V12 :cool:
i have considered both , and 4.4 v8 :cool: but then back from the land of dreams :mad:
Shinobi1
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:00 pm

Post Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:39 pm

Well any thoughts then guys ? how does an m50 converted car stack up against an m30 converted one on the road ?
bigdek
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1115
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Fife Scotland

Post Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:53 pm

no idea on performance but m50 wil be more economical
Karan
Married to the E30 Zone
Married to the E30 Zone
Posts: 8004
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Cheshunt, Hertfordshire

Post Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:56 pm

Shinobi1 wrote:Well any thoughts then guys ? how does an m50 converted car stack up against an m30 converted one on the road ?
ive been in both..... m30 is quicker.. well it feels it neway.... prob not much actual difference
Toby_Unna
Boost Junkie
Posts: 2183
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Sheffield

Post Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:09 pm

ditto that

(i think karan and I are talking about the same cars!)

the figures speak for themselves really, 193bhp vs 220bhp, and the m30 has much more torque.

2.8 m52 would be as good as an m30 i guess, but they're rarer and more expensive.
Image
Shinobi1
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:00 pm

Post Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:23 pm

Thanks guys kind of backs up my original thinking , i was pretty set on the m30 and started getting stuff together then my boss decided to start being a twat so i thought mabe the m50 would be a bit quicker to do as i have to work outside but i think i will stick to the m30 even if it takes a bit longer .

cheers ,Paul
jmc330i
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6621
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Somerset

Post Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:11 pm

Both conversions will have issues to overcome - I doubt working on your driveway will make one conversion harder than the other.

Bring on the M30 power :cool:
James
'91 325i Sport
'93 318i touring 16v