Why not M52TUB28 ?
Moderator: martauto
- Rob_farmer
- E30 Zone Newbie

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:00 pm
- Location: Latvia
Guys,
Are there any reason other than VANOS problems, why people don`t fit those updated engines into e30? Is it maybe more complicated compared to M52B28?
Are there any reason other than VANOS problems, why people don`t fit those updated engines into e30? Is it maybe more complicated compared to M52B28?
I`m driving E30, 1989, 325i, 4 door. Restoring 1990, 4 door.
-
DanThe
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 28646
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Staffs
- Contact:
The main reason is down to management, can bus and fly by wire mainly, there are people that know how to flash this out of the ECU but its still a big secret and as such they charge fortunes for it, £800 odd.
The other reason is the head/gas flow design, when they designed the engines they were not interested in them making more power, just reducing emissions, due to this the ports are much smaller and IMO give less scope for power increases.
As an example I rebuilt the bottom end of a 3.0 M54 into a single vanos 2.8 engine, using the standard 2.8 cams/ECU and it made more power and torque than the M54B30 engine is supposed to have
The other reason is the head/gas flow design, when they designed the engines they were not interested in them making more power, just reducing emissions, due to this the ports are much smaller and IMO give less scope for power increases.
As an example I rebuilt the bottom end of a 3.0 M54 into a single vanos 2.8 engine, using the standard 2.8 cams/ECU and it made more power and torque than the M54B30 engine is supposed to have
Hi Dan,DanThe wrote: As an example I rebuilt the bottom end of a 3.0 M54 into a single vanos 2.8 engine, using the standard 2.8 cams/ECU and it made more power and torque than the M54B30 engine is supposed to have
What numbers should a well put together m52b30 make? I'm trying to figure whether to go this route or bite the bullet and go s5*...
Subscribed
Dan guessing an M54B30 would have the same issues as the M54B28tu then? (Management and head flow)?

M50B25NonVanos & M52B28Vanos Heads for sale. Pm Me.
Thanks Dan - healthy amount of torque.DanThe wrote:Mine did 236hp and 239lbft
Ive since fitted S52 cams and it goes a hell of a lot better, just not got round to dynoing it again
The m52tu is pretty much the same engine as the m54
-
DanThe
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 28646
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Staffs
- Contact:
Ive not long built another, same spec as mine - http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... sc&start=0
there is a guy advertising on ebay that can flash out the canbus crap for £200 quid.
http://item.mobileweb.ebay.co.uk/viewit ... cmd=VIDESC
http://item.mobileweb.ebay.co.uk/viewit ... cmd=VIDESC
-
DanThe
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 28646
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Staffs
- Contact:
Good find!Nas80 wrote:there is a guy advertising on ebay that can flash out the canbus crap for £200 quid.
http://item.mobileweb.ebay.co.uk/viewit ... cmd=VIDESC
DanThe wrote:Mine did 236hp and 239lbft
Ive since fitted S52 cams and it goes a hell of a lot better, just not got round to dynoing it again
The m52tu is pretty much the same engine as the m54
Did Alpina spec M52's just use the standard M52 cams then??
They Real S52 CAMS or made in CHINA copies ?? LOL
236HP without a remap?????
standard or remapped?? what are the mods you got for getting 236HP ??? love to know!!!AndyZippy wrote:Mine's the one Dan mentioned above - I'll post up once i have her dyno'd, though might be a few weeks. It is a total beast though, the torque is like a wall!!
-
DanThe
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 28646
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Staffs
- Contact:
Whats alpina got to do with it?rich318i wrote:DanThe wrote:Mine did 236hp and 239lbft
Ive since fitted S52 cams and it goes a hell of a lot better, just not got round to dynoing it again
The m52tu is pretty much the same engine as the m54
Did Alpina spec M52's just use the standard M52 cams then??
They Real S52 CAMS or made in CHINA copies ?? LOL
236HP without a remap?????
Yes, 236hp and 239lbft with a standard 2.8 ECU, 6500rpm rev limit
-
maggspower
- Turbo Farmer Tractor Driver
- Posts: 2376
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Nowhere near South Wales, ok butt
Some nice numbers there Dan. A few more to come if remapped too, no doubt.DanThe wrote:Whats alpina got to do with it?rich318i wrote:DanThe wrote:Mine did 236hp and 239lbft
Ive since fitted S52 cams and it goes a hell of a lot better, just not got round to dynoing it again
The m52tu is pretty much the same engine as the m54
Did Alpina spec M52's just use the standard M52 cams then??
They Real S52 CAMS or made in CHINA copies ?? LOL
236HP without a remap?????![]()
Yes, 236hp and 239lbft with a standard 2.8 ECU, 6500rpm rev limit
Do the AFRs stay in the good zone with the standard map?
Contact: theengineshedonline@gmail.com
So how come loads of these 328s seem to have head work done or had failing head gaskets is it an actual common problem with them or have i just seen some unlucky ones for sale .
also the 323 motor is a 2.5 version of the 2.8 how come people dont fit these instead of the m50 is it down to the same problem as the M52TUB28 with the can bus crap
also the 323 motor is a 2.5 version of the 2.8 how come people dont fit these instead of the m50 is it down to the same problem as the M52TUB28 with the can bus crap
others said your alpina 3.0L did 236hp and i be lucky to get them figs with my S52 cams and all my mods.DanThe wrote:Whats alpina got to do with it?rich318i wrote:DanThe wrote:Mine did 236hp and 239lbft
Ive since fitted S52 cams and it goes a hell of a lot better, just not got round to dynoing it again
The m52tu is pretty much the same engine as the m54
Did Alpina spec M52's just use the standard M52 cams then??
They Real S52 CAMS or made in CHINA copies ?? LOL
236HP without a remap?????![]()
Yes, 236hp and 239lbft with a standard 2.8 ECU, 6500rpm rev limit
Even your self said dan the 250-260Hp wasnt possible with the cams so now going by what your saying now it is!!!
-
maggspower
- Turbo Farmer Tractor Driver
- Posts: 2376
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Nowhere near South Wales, ok butt
The 323i is fitted with a load of detuning stuff, throttle, manifold etc. Fitting the 2.5 gubbins makes it go like a...er... 2.5sunnysr wrote:So how come loads of these 328s seem to have head work done or had failing head gaskets is it an actual common problem with them or have i just seen some unlucky ones for sale .
also the 323 motor is a 2.5 version of the 2.8 how come people dont fit these instead of the m50 is it down to the same problem as the M52TUB28 with the can bus crap
A bit like the m50 manifold releases the latent power in a 2.8.
Contact: theengineshedonline@gmail.com
- Rob_farmer
- E30 Zone Newbie

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:00 pm
- Location: Latvia
How much in total it cost you?DanThe wrote:Mine did 236hp and 239lbft
Ive since fitted S52 cams and it goes a hell of a lot bette
I`m driving E30, 1989, 325i, 4 door. Restoring 1990, 4 door.
- Rob_farmer
- E30 Zone Newbie

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:00 pm
- Location: Latvia
Do you have build thread? Very interestedAndyZippy wrote:It is a total beast though, the torque is like a wall!!
I`m driving E30, 1989, 325i, 4 door. Restoring 1990, 4 door.



