























Would have been rude not to! -

http://s43.photobucket.com/user/digit99 ... sort=3&o=1
http://s43.photobucket.com/user/digit99 ... sort=3&o=0
Sorry for hugely long first post!
Moderator: martauto






































Digit wrote:. I'd like to see another e30 on 185/45/15 front tyres that doesnt have any arch gap without the use of air

Digit wrote:Car does what I want it to mate and looks how I want it to except decent bodywork but sadly that costs money. Glad I can show you that not everyone likes the way that YOU like a car. Car scene is massive with so many different styles and uses for a car. Single minded people like you amuse me and make this all the more enjoyable to be honestno likey, no writey lol
bullseyediable wrote:Kos, how much could you punt out Knob'ys Missus for, per hour?








"in" parts, well i dont go for the "in" like some, and in this case the look is scrapDigit wrote: Differed vastly? Anything you have done yourself or did you pay someone else to do it for you after you bought all the "in" parts that everyone else was fitting at the time?




Fo0k me thats low, you live local to me Kos?!? how are you able to drive cars that low and my car which can fit not just one cigarette pack but a whole brick of fags under it but im still finding it difficult not to scrape.Kos wrote:It's as low as any one who's sensible would want to go with a daily, but I'm not surprised it doesn't meet your chassis rail/sump cracking expectations
Then again you've cabled tied parts on, run low profile stretched tyres on 15" high ET wheels and incorrect shock lengths to attain your lows
Here's another low, not strictly my car. It's my best mates and I've had the missfortune of getting beached while driving it on a cambered road, like i did with my white one
Lets be honest, there's lowered, there is low and then there is stupid/dangerous
Awwww Fwends, Best fwiends!!Kos wrote:Here's another low, not strictly my car. It's my best mates

