Cabby with 227 miles from new
Moderator: martauto
-
Gert_8
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 11304
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: In your back passage faster than a rat up a drainpipe!
Nah, regular one with 104k on the clocks is about the price this guy is asking. If you pay a little less, it will help sort out the rust issues..pacerpete wrote:An E30 M3 with 227 miles on it will cost a little bit more than 26k though, like 3 times more 1

PONY, 2013 - "Anyway span 360 degrees hitting the kerb and giving the old man two fingers as I was spinning like Michael Schumacher would
I'd rather have an M3 with however many miles on it, than a run of the mill cab just because it has delivery miles on it. Obviously I'm not comparing this to an M3 with delivery miles

1990 E30 325i Sport Sterling Silber
1999 E36 323i Sport Touring Techno Violet
-
snakebrain
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:00 pm
I'd have this over a ratty M3 any day!
Given the mileage, if this car was always destined for a collection it may have been imported but never registered, meaning it wouldn't need to meet the US 5mph crash test and also wouldn't need the world's ugliest bumpers..
Given the mileage, if this car was always destined for a collection it may have been imported but never registered, meaning it wouldn't need to meet the US 5mph crash test and also wouldn't need the world's ugliest bumpers..
-
pacerpete
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 18168
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Iver heath. South bucks.
It meets the federal standards with its US spec facelift bumpers and sealed beam headlights present and correct.snakebrain wrote:I'd have this over a ratty M3 any day!
Given the mileage, if this car was always destined for a collection it may have been imported but never registered, meaning it wouldn't need to meet the US 5mph crash test and also wouldn't need the world's ugliest bumpers..
Shame the freak who bought it and locked it away for over twenty years did not buy an M3. The two cars would have been a similar price new . The M3 would have got him a lot better return on his investment !
-
Topblag
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Fife - You got a problem with that ?
It's bizarre, 20 + years of storage for what's probably zero profit once you factor in the costs to put it back on the road.
Perhaps it'll make a profit if it's kept and sold in 10 years time.
Perhaps it'll make a profit if it's kept and sold in 10 years time.
1990 325i Cab auto in Alpine White II
1988 Alpina C2.5 moredoor in Black, 71k
1990 325ix, moredoor auto in Laser Blue. 51k
1984 Hartge H35 in Black
2004 996 C4S in Silver 43k manual
2006 Audi S6 V10 in Black 58k
1988 Alpina C2.5 moredoor in Black, 71k
1990 325ix, moredoor auto in Laser Blue. 51k
1984 Hartge H35 in Black
2004 996 C4S in Silver 43k manual
2006 Audi S6 V10 in Black 58k
-
zimmermatt
- E30 Zone Regular

- Posts: 271
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
Surely they wouldnt have been that similar in price would they?pacerpete wrote:It meets the federal standards with its US spec facelift bumpers and sealed beam headlights present and correct.snakebrain wrote:I'd have this over a ratty M3 any day!
Given the mileage, if this car was always destined for a collection it may have been imported but never registered, meaning it wouldn't need to meet the US 5mph crash test and also wouldn't need the world's ugliest bumpers..
Shame the freak who bought it and locked it away for over twenty years did not buy an M3. The two cars would have been a similar price new . The M3 would have got him a lot better return on his investment !
And yes I would definitely rather go with the higher miles m3. Not that thats an option!
-
Ajsingh
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 11:00 pm
- Location: West Laaaandaan init! / Milton Keynes
Very nice!!! Didn't know you could fit that steering in the car. Surely it would need an SRS control unit and sensors for it to go off. Was that a factory option or nah?
Iv never ever seen an E30 with an airbag before
Iv never ever seen an E30 with an airbag before
E30 Crazy!
-
Cloggy Saint
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: zummerzet
US spec cabrios switched to plastic bumpers during the second half of 1991.trevski wrote:I thought the bumpers were different ie mahoosive on us spec cars !? Or was this just a state to state to requirement!
Still very very nice I like![]()
![]()
-
ross_jsy
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 7307
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Jersey, C.I.
US and probably other market e30's came with them from factoryAjsingh wrote:Very nice!!! Didn't know you could fit that steering in the car. Surely it would need an SRS control unit and sensors for it to go off. Was that a factory option or nah?
Iv never ever seen an E30 with an airbag before
-
B7
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 15846
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:00 pm
- Location: Surrey / West Sussex
How do you work that one out?zimmermatt wrote:air con and cab makes one slow 2.5.
Same as always with this car. Find another. You won't. Is it worth the money? If someones willing to pay it yes!
We can chat M3 bollotics all day but by a high miler ratty m3 and see what it'll cost you to get it to this standard. And you'll still have what was an abused high miler that will never be worth an m3 with delivery miles on it!
And you'd still be stuck with a 4 pot!!!
B7 wrote:How do you work that one out?zimmermatt wrote:air con and cab makes one slow 2.5.
Same as always with this car. Find another. You won't. Is it worth the money? If someones willing to pay it yes!
We can chat M3 bollotics all day but by a high miler ratty m3 and see what it'll cost you to get it to this standard. And you'll still have what was an abused high miler that will never be worth an m3 with delivery miles on it!
And you'd still be stuck with a 4 pot!!!![]()
-
zimmermatt
- E30 Zone Regular

- Posts: 271
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
camcc wrote:B7 wrote:How do you work that one out?zimmermatt wrote:air con and cab makes one slow 2.5.
Same as always with this car. Find another. You won't. Is it worth the money? If someones willing to pay it yes!
We can chat M3 bollotics all day but by a high miler ratty m3 and see what it'll cost you to get it to this standard. And you'll still have what was an abused high miler that will never be worth an m3 with delivery miles on it!
And you'd still be stuck with a 4 pot!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
M3 bollotics haha! Well a cab is heavier in the first place due to the strengthening in the doors yeh? Plus to that the weight of air con and the fact that when its on it drains the power then you have a slower 2.5, simples ol chap!
No one in theyre right mind would be comparing this to a m3 with delivery miles. I think youve misread what is being said and Im pretty sure youll find that for £27,000 you will get more than a ratty m3.
And if im goin to have to be 'stuck' with a four pot I think id just have to live with that as its more powerful and lighter and better for handling than the big 6pots. We're not talking 1.8's here ya know.
-
Gert_8
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 11304
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: In your back passage faster than a rat up a drainpipe!
The M3 is the more desirable car, full stop, hence the demand for them, and their prices being higher than any of the 3 series of this generation.
If you compare like for like, i.e prestine vs prestine, M3 wins. If you compare shite vs shite, it wins again...!
That is the point.
Now, if I'm asked to take the prestine cabby or an M3 selling for the same amount, but is used, it would be the M3 again.
If you compare like for like, i.e prestine vs prestine, M3 wins. If you compare shite vs shite, it wins again...!
That is the point.
Now, if I'm asked to take the prestine cabby or an M3 selling for the same amount, but is used, it would be the M3 again.

PONY, 2013 - "Anyway span 360 degrees hitting the kerb and giving the old man two fingers as I was spinning like Michael Schumacher would
-
Jim320i
- E30 Zone News / COTM Team

- Posts: 10627
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Leicestershire
- Contact:
I know very little about collecting car other than scrap heaps stored in a field
But i'm pretty certain those who are willing to part with 26k (That the price? Cant be bothered to scroll back) for a car that they arent going to be using and are buying it for the fact it is a how ever many year old car with 227 miles on it arent all that bothered if they could buy a higher millege top of the range model for the same price, the whole point is to have the low millege minters locked up rather than trying to polish a high millege council up M3...
I might be wrong though.
I might be wrong though.
-
Rosc0PColtrane
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 9757
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: With Ceiling cat, watching you masturbate.
You really used the weight of the aircon as an arguement?zimmermatt wrote:camcc wrote:B7 wrote: How do you work that one out?
Same as always with this car. Find another. You won't. Is it worth the money? If someones willing to pay it yes!
We can chat M3 bollotics all day but by a high miler ratty m3 and see what it'll cost you to get it to this standard. And you'll still have what was an abused high miler that will never be worth an m3 with delivery miles on it!
And you'd still be stuck with a 4 pot!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
M3 bollotics haha! Well a cab is heavier in the first place due to the strengthening in the doors yeh? Plus to that the weight of air con and the fact that when its on it drains the power then you have a slower 2.5, simples ol chap!
No one in theyre right mind would be comparing this to a m3 with delivery miles. I think youve misread what is being said and Im pretty sure youll find that for £27,000 you will get more than a ratty m3.
And if im goin to have to be 'stuck' with a four pot I think id just have to live with that as its more powerful and lighter and better for handling than the big 6pots. We're not talking 1.8's here ya know.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
Gert_8
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 11304
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: In your back passage faster than a rat up a drainpipe!
Well, if we're talking about adding to a collection, then the cabby is the no brainer.pacerpete wrote:As Trevor rightly said, this car is one of one. Where is there another ? You only need one hero who has lots of dollarz and fond memories involving E30 convertibles and it is gone.

PONY, 2013 - "Anyway span 360 degrees hitting the kerb and giving the old man two fingers as I was spinning like Michael Schumacher would
-
zimmermatt
- E30 Zone Regular

- Posts: 271
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
No argument mate. discussion yes. That was one small part of a post, funny the little bits people pick up on.Rosc0PColtrane wrote:You really used the weight of the aircon as an arguement?zimmermatt wrote:camcc wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
M3 bollotics haha! Well a cab is heavier in the first place due to the strengthening in the doors yeh? Plus to that the weight of air con and the fact that when its on it drains the power then you have a slower 2.5, simples ol chap!
No one in theyre right mind would be comparing this to a m3 with delivery miles. I think youve misread what is being said and Im pretty sure youll find that for £27,000 you will get more than a ratty m3.
And if im goin to have to be 'stuck' with a four pot I think id just have to live with that as its more powerful and lighter and better for handling than the big 6pots. We're not talking 1.8's here ya know.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I get that its a collectors car. The post says discuss. I was discussing that it wouldnt be for me and as a car for a collection I would rather something of motorsport heritage. And yes you can get these vehicles for that money. Everyone seems to think £27,000 is pocket change. Im pretty sure 'council' m3's if there ever was one start more around £9/10,000 mark.
Every one is entitled to theyre opinion, this is mine. That car will make somebody very happy I'm sure.
-
zimmermatt
- E30 Zone Regular

- Posts: 271
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
Exunctly!Gert_8 wrote:The M3 is the more desirable car, full stop, hence the demand for them, and their prices being higher than any of the 3 series of this generation.
If you compare like for like, i.e prestine vs prestine, M3 wins. If you compare shite vs shite, it wins again...!
That is the point.
Now, if I'm asked to take the prestine cabby or an M3 selling for the same amount, but is used, it would be the M3 again.
-
B7
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 15846
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:00 pm
- Location: Surrey / West Sussex
For a start the strengthening in a convertible is actually in the sills, inner wings and A posts. Theres naff all in the doors to worry about. (Yeh?)zimmermatt wrote:No argument mate. discussion yes. That was one small part of a post, funny the little bits people pick up on.Rosc0PColtrane wrote:You really used the weight of the aircon as an arguement?zimmermatt wrote:
M3 bollotics haha! Well a cab is heavier in the first place due to the strengthening in the doors yeh? Plus to that the weight of air con and the fact that when its on it drains the power then you have a slower 2.5, simples ol chap!
No one in theyre right mind would be comparing this to a m3 with delivery miles. I think youve misread what is being said and Im pretty sure youll find that for £27,000 you will get more than a ratty m3.
And if im goin to have to be 'stuck' with a four pot I think id just have to live with that as its more powerful and lighter and better for handling than the big 6pots. We're not talking 1.8's here ya know.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I get that its a collectors car. The post says discuss. I was discussing that it wouldnt be for me and as a car for a collection I would rather something of motorsport heritage. And yes you can get these vehicles for that money. Everyone seems to think £27,000 is pocket change. Im pretty sure 'council' m3's if there ever was one start more around £9/10,000 mark.
Every one is entitled to theyre opinion, this is mine. That car will make somebody very happy I'm sure.
Weight wise:
325i saloon 1209kg
325i convertible 1255kg
325i Touring 1290kg
M3 saloon 1220kg
M3 convertible 1360kg
http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/ ... car=170742
So according to that (and I'm not sure why) the M3 convertible is actually the fat f*ck and a touring 325 is heavier than an 325i Convertible.
I would think the weight of an air con set up is the least of peoples worries. As for the power it saps, My AC in the e39 is never switched off. It actually makes naff all difference to the average joe.
-
B7
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 15846
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:00 pm
- Location: Surrey / West Sussex
Shame this is the wrong side of the pond pierre.pacerpete wrote:As Trevor rightly said, this car is one of one. Where is there another ? You only need one hero who has lots of dollarz and fond memories involving E30 convertibles and it is gone.
-
Rosc0PColtrane
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 9757
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: With Ceiling cat, watching you masturbate.
I picked up on it as it was f00king daft to even mention it, especially when the weight of a driver can easily vary as much as 40 or 50kgs. The a/c weight is hardly going to be a deciding factor and certainly a lolworthy point to make. You might as well start offsetting the weight of the roofs and body parts to be fully pedantic.zimmermatt wrote:No argument mate. discussion yes. That was one small part of a post, funny the little bits people pick up on.Rosc0PColtrane wrote:You really used the weight of the aircon as an arguement?zimmermatt wrote:
M3 bollotics haha! Well a cab is heavier in the first place due to the strengthening in the doors yeh? Plus to that the weight of air con and the fact that when its on it drains the power then you have a slower 2.5, simples ol chap!
No one in theyre right mind would be comparing this to a m3 with delivery miles. I think youve misread what is being said and Im pretty sure youll find that for £27,000 you will get more than a ratty m3.
And if im goin to have to be 'stuck' with a four pot I think id just have to live with that as its more powerful and lighter and better for handling than the big 6pots. We're not talking 1.8's here ya know.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I get that its a collectors car. The post says discuss. I was discussing that it wouldnt be for me and as a car for a collection I would rather something of motorsport heritage. And yes you can get these vehicles for that money. Everyone seems to think £27,000 is pocket change. Im pretty sure 'council' m3's if there ever was one start more around £9/10,000 mark.
Every one is entitled to theyre opinion, this is mine. That car will make somebody very happy I'm sure.
The irony is your middle para there is a much more salient general point and is a sufficient point to make.
Have to laugh at how far people go to try and win internet arguements.





