How big was the spacer for the engine mounts for the M42? Sounds like a "fix" until I can get some proper new mounts (Assuming I have this issue at all)Jozi wrote:I ran the E46 rack with the rubber guibo removed, did has some manifold clearance issue's with right hand corners taken at some speed. This was with a m42 engine, the clearance was solved by rounding the UJ's and a small spacer under the engine mounts.
My M52 is getting modified UJ's and a straight spline from Dan.
e46 rack fitted
Moderator: martauto
- mwggriffiths
- E30 Zone Newbie

- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 11:00 pm
- Location: Solihull
I'll be fitting mine to an M42 over the weekend
Hopefully my springs and dampers will be here by then - no sign of them yet 
1990 318iS, 1998 E36 328i Touring, 2001 740i Sport, 1971 Range Rover
Hi Dan, should the spacers for the rack not go below the rack as on a lowered car, spacers below the rack will help eliminate bump steer as it raises the rack slightly.DanThe wrote:Standard M52 manifold is a no go, they need modding.
E36 or E46 or Z3 rack used in the rear holes with spacers above the rack (the correct mounting point) will work with M20 standard manifolds and the linkage minus rubber part. Its a bit close but new engine mounts should prevent any exhaust/linkage contact
It was only a few mm, 5mm at most, few very large washers. If your bushes are still good you prob wont have any problems though!mwggriffiths wrote: How big was the spacer for the engine mounts for the M42? Sounds like a "fix" until I can get some proper new mounts (Assuming I have this issue at all)
Just the manis or the linkage too?DanThe wrote:Standard M52 manifold is a no go, they need modding
E36 or E46 or Z3 rack used in the rear holes with spacers above the rack (the correct mounting point) will work with M20 standard manifolds and the linkage minus rubber part. Its a bit close but new engine mounts should prevent any exhaust/linkage contact



