Standard 70K M40b16 316i against a 318iS with a Evolve chipped 100K 93' M42 with possibly an M20 flywheel.
316 was able to stay on it's bumper from around 30-80mph
Moderator: martauto
It's the extra weight of the galvanizing..Dave_M3 wrote:By a 316i!!!
Standard 70K M40b16 316i against a 318iS with a Evolve chipped 100K 93' M42 with possibly an M20 flywheel.
316 was able to stay on it's bumper from around 30-80mph

316's aint all that bad. Both cars are 1.8L. the 316i is a 1.6L.Alex wrote:i find that very hard to belive, my 316i wasnt much quicker than my 1.0 3cyl corsa, and the IS was way way quicker than my corsa
engine was obviosly fooked/needed a service
i timed a 0-60 on mine today 0-60 in 7.9 seconds![]()
8 seconds if you want to be pickey![]()
i cannot see any 316i doing that


Or just another 2 cylindersAlex wrote:lol, i'am not doubting it never happend but the IS must have needed a desperate service or overhaul

21bhp more with an IS there deffintly quicker than a normal 318iNayC wrote:316's aint all that bad. Both cars are 1.8L. the 316i is a 1.6L.Alex wrote:i find that very hard to belive, my 316i wasnt much quicker than my 1.0 3cyl corsa, and the IS was way way quicker than my corsa
engine was obviosly fooked/needed a service
i timed a 0-60 on mine today 0-60 in 7.9 seconds![]()
8 seconds if you want to be pickey![]()
i cannot see any 316i doing that
Normal 318i are still only just (marginally) off the iS. But seriously, did the 316 also have a passanger?

I went from a standard 316 for a year to a chipped and remapped iS and thought it was a rocket toomagpie wrote:i've had a 318i m40 for 14 mth before the IS,
and my is would have pissed all over the m40
before any mods i carried out recently.
Made 150bhp on the rollers a month ago!!!Alex wrote:lol, i'am not doubting it never happend but the IS must have needed a desperate service or overhaul

8 sec is very quick. Your IS is fast.Alex wrote:i find that very hard to belive, my 316i wasnt much quicker than my 1.0 3cyl corsa, and the IS was way way quicker than my corsa
engine was obviosly fooked/needed a service
i timed a 0-60 on mine today 0-60 in 7.9 seconds![]()
8 seconds if you want to be pickey![]()
i cannot see any 316i doing that

better than i thought too, probs because of the chip i can get to 60 in second i.e. no rev limiter to worry about till around 65mphBlitz wrote:8 sec is very quick. Your IS is fast.Alex wrote:i find that very hard to belive, my 316i wasnt much quicker than my 1.0 3cyl corsa, and the IS was way way quicker than my corsa
engine was obviosly fooked/needed a service
i timed a 0-60 on mine today 0-60 in 7.9 seconds![]()
8 seconds if you want to be pickey![]()
i cannot see any 316i doing that
about 7.5 for mineBlitz wrote:8 sec is very quick. Your IS is fast.Alex wrote:i find that very hard to belive, my 316i wasnt much quicker than my 1.0 3cyl corsa, and the IS was way way quicker than my corsa
engine was obviosly fooked/needed a service
i timed a 0-60 on mine today 0-60 in 7.9 seconds![]()
8 seconds if you want to be pickey![]()
i cannot see any 316i doing that

what mods have you done to yours again, i used the obc to time mineDave_M3 wrote:about 7.5 for mineBlitz wrote:8 sec is very quick. Your IS is fast.Alex wrote:i find that very hard to belive, my 316i wasnt much quicker than my 1.0 3cyl corsa, and the IS was way way quicker than my corsa
engine was obviosly fooked/needed a service
i timed a 0-60 on mine today 0-60 in 7.9 seconds![]()
8 seconds if you want to be pickey![]()
i cannot see any 316i doing that

