r-reg 318ti
Moderator: martauto
-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
will the engine in this be an m44?

m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds
-
maxfield
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 15185
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Mansfield
I'm fairly sure of it.

-
RM2186
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Washington, Tyne & Wear
-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
ooh goodie


m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds
-
RM2186
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Washington, Tyne & Wear
-
leeparkes
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 9535
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Black country
Can the M44 be used in the e30? are they better than M42?
Cypriotgeeza wrote:I done both my mates in my old 318is
felt so proud,even tried it with a E30 325i and got put in my place..
-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
yes to the 1st
watch this space re 2nd question.
my final swap before 24v land
watch this space re 2nd question.
my final swap before 24v land

m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds
-
RM2186
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Washington, Tyne & Wear
-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
i'm looking forward to having a quiet engine.
the weather is all that holds me up as far as getting it in the e30.
should be looking at 24v in a yrs time .
the weather is all that holds me up as far as getting it in the e30.
should be looking at 24v in a yrs time .

m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds
-
leeparkes
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 9535
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Black country
What is the difference between m42 & m44?
Ive got an m44 in my compact ti, ive heard they are more torquey low down, something to do with the inlet mani
Ive got an m44 in my compact ti, ive heard they are more torquey low down, something to do with the inlet mani
Cypriotgeeza wrote:I done both my mates in my old 318is
felt so proud,even tried it with a E30 325i and got put in my place..
-
DanThe
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 28649
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Staffs
M44 is a 1.9, the difference is like driving with a tail wind as opposed to driving into the wind 
-
leeparkes
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 9535
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Black country
Ive just thought magpie, will you need the ews gubbins to make it run or will it run with the m42 management.
Probably have to swap the sump too
Dan, im just getting clued up when mine gets yanked out to see how much i can sell it off for, nobody wants an m44 on e36.coupe
Probably have to swap the sump too
Dan, im just getting clued up when mine gets yanked out to see how much i can sell it off for, nobody wants an m44 on e36.coupe
Cypriotgeeza wrote:I done both my mates in my old 318is
felt so proud,even tried it with a E30 325i and got put in my place..
-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
my fly kit and chip should help the hi- cup or fart along for another 12 mth £till i take the plunge into valveness bliss.DanThe wrote:M44 is a 1.9, the difference is like driving with a tail wind as opposed to driving into the wind
this way is the best short term option i have being happy for a while.in a small Bowl.

m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds
-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
will the box from the ti be of any use?

m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds
-
Andyboy
- Alpina Colada
- Posts: 12576
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:00 pm
leeparkes wrote:
1.)Can the M44 be used in the e30?
2.) Are they better than M42?
1.) Not without a lot of work.
2.) Not really. I've never driven a 1.9Ti Compact that goes any better than my 1.8. A bit more torque, no extra bhp but better economy - and that's marginal. The only real advantage is that they're newer.
-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
the work involved for a straight swap into an e30is is only swap
sump and pick up pipe,p/s pump & bracket,loom,and the inlet manifold.
not hard if you have an is to start with.
sump and pick up pipe,p/s pump & bracket,loom,and the inlet manifold.
not hard if you have an is to start with.

m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds
-
Andyboy
- Alpina Colada
- Posts: 12576
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:00 pm
What do you do about the cam sensor?
I'll answer that for you shall I?
The M44 is a lot more work that just a sump and a manifold. The M44 management with the AFM would be a lot of work to mate to an E30 car loom. Not impossible, but still not easy. If you can do that, you don't need to change the inlet manifold.
To use the existing M42 loom and ECU would be a serious amount of work. The M44 cam sensor will not work with the M42 loom. Fit an M42 sensor? You can't because the upper timing cover is different, the hole for the sensor is a different diamer and in the wrong place. The M44 cam sensor is all different too and is a trigger ring and not just a lug on the inlet cam sprocket. There are also two threaded holes in the head for the two coolant sensors, and only one of the M44.
I could go on, but at the end of the day fitting an M44 into an E30 is not easy and is basically a waste of time.
I'll answer that for you shall I?
The M44 is a lot more work that just a sump and a manifold. The M44 management with the AFM would be a lot of work to mate to an E30 car loom. Not impossible, but still not easy. If you can do that, you don't need to change the inlet manifold.
To use the existing M42 loom and ECU would be a serious amount of work. The M44 cam sensor will not work with the M42 loom. Fit an M42 sensor? You can't because the upper timing cover is different, the hole for the sensor is a different diamer and in the wrong place. The M44 cam sensor is all different too and is a trigger ring and not just a lug on the inlet cam sprocket. There are also two threaded holes in the head for the two coolant sensors, and only one of the M44.
I could go on, but at the end of the day fitting an M44 into an E30 is not easy and is basically a waste of time.
Last edited by Andyboy on Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
320ise
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 2033
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:00 pm
i am a big fan of the m42 and m44 engines read alot about them last year, the m42 is the "stronger engine" of the 2 as it has a forged bottom end where the m44 is not, bmw did improve the m42 with the m44 but pepole have said that if it had been forged like the m42 and had a less restrictive intake could have made more torque and better power up in the rev range. if i can find the sites i read the info on i will post the links.
E34 ///M5 THE BEST BMW EVER BUILT?


-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
shxt Andy,i never thought it was this complicated.Andyboy wrote:What do you do about the cam sensor?
I'll answer that for you shall I?
The M44 is a lot more work that just a sump and a manifold. The M44 management with the AFM would be a lot of work to mate to an E30 car loom. Not impossible, but still not easy. If you can do that, you don't need to change the inlet manifold.
To use the existing M42 loom and ECU would be a serious amount of work. The M44 cam sensor will not work with the M42 loom. Fit an M42 sensor? You can't because the upper timing cover is different, the hole for the sensor is a different diamer and in the wrong place. The M44 cam sensor is all different too and is a trigger ring and not just a lug on the inlet cam sprocket. There are also two threaded holes in the head for the two coolant sensors, and only one of the M44.
I could go on, but at the end of the day fitting an M44 into an E30 is not easy and is basically a waste of time.
many thanks for your valued input.
looks like i just avoided a headache.i was about to part with $ tomorrow as well

m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds
-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
will the afm from this work on an e30 m40/42.
they look very similar??
they look very similar??

m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds
-
donnyboiler
- E30 Zone Newbie

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 11:00 pm
Yes, they are better. They have all the same screamy top end, more torque, better mpg, and the same bulletproof reliability. I have been a big fan of the M42 for years and the M44 beats it in every respect.leeparkes wrote:Can the M44 be used in the e30? are they better than M42?
Don
-
donnyboiler
- E30 Zone Newbie

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 11:00 pm
Sorry, didn't read this. The rest of what I said though...320ise wrote:i am a big fan of the m42 and m44 engines read alot about them last year, the m42 is the "stronger engine" of the 2 as it has a forged bottom end where the m44 is not, bmw did improve the m42 with the m44 but pepole have said that if it had been forged like the m42 and had a less restrictive intake could have made more torque and better power up in the rev range. if i can find the sites i read the info on i will post the links.
-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
so have you fitted on in an e30.donnyboiler wrote:Yes, they are better. They have all the same screamy top end, more torque, better mpg, and the same bulletproof reliability. I have been a big fan of the M42 for years and the M44 beats it in every respect.leeparkes wrote:Can the M44 be used in the e30? are they better than M42?
Don
btw 24v ftw

m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds
-
Hibsfan1875
- E30 Zone Regular

- Posts: 569
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:00 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
-
donnyboiler
- E30 Zone Newbie

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 11:00 pm
Sorry, no. I can't comment on how it would perform in an e30, just on my experience with both engines.magpie wrote:so have you fitted on in an e30.donnyboiler wrote:Yes, they are better. They have all the same screamy top end, more torque, better mpg, and the same bulletproof reliability. I have been a big fan of the M42 for years and the M44 beats it in every respect.leeparkes wrote:Can the M44 be used in the e30? are they better than M42?
Don
btw 24v ftw
Apprently the later M42 (from the E36 318is) goes in without too much trouble. This engine also has a nice extra bit of torque and mpg.
I've never driven a 24v E30. I can imagine that would be the ultimate. I have a 328i E36 and love it. Light engine too. How is the traction?
Don
-
magpie
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Consett,Durham.
i'll let you know when it's fitted,i will be running a 3.64 lsd so should be fun 

m52 b30 stroker 6-speed 318is Galvanizer
m42 touring
+ a yard full of scrap turds


