http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/BMW-320i-LPG-CONV ... dZViewItem
is this a first ?
is it something worth doing, is there any power gain-loss ?
Moderator: martauto


just as i thought, you do get a performance loss thendaimlerman wrote:I have pondered this for a while now.PPC ran an article a while back talking about LPG as a performance fuel.Now aftermarket ECU's are available with switchable MAP's I am wondering if it would be possible to have a MAP best suited to LPG and one best suited to petrol,so that one can start up on petrol and switch to LPG on a hot engine.I have little understanding of how this might work,though,or the costs involved.My only experience of LPG was with a 1.4 Renault that I had converted proffesionaly at a cost of (I think) around £1500.I covered some 60,000 miles in this car in ten months at an average LPG consumtion of 31mpg.On unleaded,I was returning 36mpg.I noted a small performance drop on LPG.

I did a cost comparison (in May this year) before fitting the LPG, and my 320i Touring was costing me over 17p/mile in normal unleaded.bazza93 wrote:fills up for £15my e30 used to cost £45
my pajero costs..........................................£75

bazza93 wrote:just as i thought, you do get a performance loss then
Obviously, it depends on how much power the car has to start with, and it will also depend on how well the LPG system is set-up. 1.4 Reanults aren't exactly powerful, are they?StuBeeDoo wrote:I can't tell any difference in the performance, but then I'm not a experienced race driver.

Most certainly! IIRC, there's a Focus running 'round that's putting out 400+bhp on LPG.bazza93 wrote:so you should be able to still performance tune an engine that runs on lpg
Jeremy Clarkson wrote:...but it drives the front wheels. Theee wrooong wheels!
da4x4turbo wrote:I raced a vivaro on the motorway once in a 318is.... and lost!!!




thats a well valid pointmarch109 wrote:I would assume because LPG burns 'cooler' than petrol that its actually better in turbo applications as it would not be so easy to cause detonation.
Turbo guru could confirm tho?!
Where did you get your kit from and would it be easy to install for a non mechanic?klu99apm wrote:I converted my 325 touring myself to LPG nearly 2 years ago. It was an easy enough job (especially with a few PM's to Brianmooore about the electrics!)
I bought a complete kit for about £500 with a Leonardo ECU control for the gas. I do notice a slight performance loss but not a lot, and if you feel the need max performance it can be switched over to petrol at the flick of a switch. I never seem to have a problem finding a petrol station with gas - you notice them more perhaps if you have an LPG powered car!
For me it means, as a student, I can afford to run a BMW 6 cylinder car while eveyone else is stuck with 1.4 clio's etc!


Very much so, take a look at the BP ultimate 102 octane thread running at the mo.bazza93 wrote:thats a well valid pointmarch109 wrote:I would assume because LPG burns 'cooler' than petrol that its actually better in turbo applications as it would not be so easy to cause detonation.
Turbo guru could confirm tho?!did'nt think of that
also must be the same for supercharging then

Only worry about the higher octane rating if you have a F.I or highly tuned engine.daimlerman wrote:I am also interested,but would need a guide to follow.As I have already said,I would think that one of these multi MAP ECU's is the way forward so as to take proper advantage of LPG's higher octane rating.

IIRC, LPGing a diesel is possible, but is a very precise science and no LPG kit manufacturer has really mastered it. Another IIRC - with a diesel, it still needs a proportion of diesel in the mixture, which is where the preciseness(sp?) of the science comes in. Too much diesel makes the LPG a waste of time. Too much LPG will screw the engine.bazza93 wrote:am i correct in saying you can't do this to a diesel ?
thats good enough for meStuBeeDoo wrote:IIRC, LPGing a diesel is possible, but is a very precise science and no LPG kit manufacturer has really mastered it. Another IIRC - with a diesel, it still needs a proportion of diesel in the mixture, which is where the preciseness(sp?) of the science comes in. Too much diesel makes the LPG a waste of time. Too much LPG will screw the engine.bazza93 wrote:am i correct in saying you can't do this to a diesel ?
I may have got that all wrong though. I didn't pay too much attention as it was of no real interest to me.
If someone (Brian?) knows different, I'm sure they'll put me right.

yes you are correct (though I stand to be corrected on my resoning why..) I believe this is because LPG has a high octane rating meaning it takes more heat energy to ignite the fuel, diesel engines require not a low octane because diesel isn't measured in octane (measured in cetane) but an ability to autoignite under pressure and not heat application.bazza93 wrote:am i correct in saying you can't do this to a diesel ?
