HEAD FLOW
Moderator: martauto
Depends how much power he's aiming for.davecave wrote:Will you really gain anything for all the work it will take mate????
If with BBTB, 6 branch and a decent cam then it will probably make a significant difference.

Hi
The 885 head flows pretty well from the box about 20% over the small port head. The real only gain is to run bigger valves and bigger throats, but the m52 heads flow about 30% more than a 885 another reason for an engine swap.
My mate is runing a load of tests on m20 heads on his flowbench at work so i hope to have real data soon.
The intake system is going to give more restance than the head, MS is probably going to gain more than head work.
Jason
The 885 head flows pretty well from the box about 20% over the small port head. The real only gain is to run bigger valves and bigger throats, but the m52 heads flow about 30% more than a 885 another reason for an engine swap.
My mate is runing a load of tests on m20 heads on his flowbench at work so i hope to have real data soon.
The intake system is going to give more restance than the head, MS is probably going to gain more than head work.
Jason
-
Turbo-Brown
- Boost Junkie
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hants
- Contact:
Throttle bodies should flow better than the cast inlet 
i am looking into doing a extrude hone + gasket match and clean up aroung the ports on my intake manifold in the coming months and i have heard 20% flow increases but thats definately not a 20% power increases. Its an expensive exercise (~250 pounds) but i'll be doing before and after dyno runs for all to see.ed325i wrote:Could an inlet manifold be made that flows better ?The intake system is going to give more restance than the head
What would be the best design ?
-
Turbo-Brown
- Boost Junkie
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hants
- Contact:
Would be cool if you can do that in isolation without any other mods reggid 
-
Turbo-Brown
- Boost Junkie
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hants
- Contact:
Good things to those who wait 
Hi
With out going to ITB's a log style manfold with a big throttle body would flow better something like this.
http://sdsefi.com/techinta.htm
The GT power simulation for the m20 shows up a decent pressure drop across the standard manifold
http://www.gtisoft.com/broch_gtpower.html
Check out the US fourms like rev3 or e30tech for the opinons on the extrude hone.
Ditch the AFM and go to alpha-n will give the best result for least spanner work. That's why it is very popular on s14's, even better if you go to stand alone.
Jason
With out going to ITB's a log style manfold with a big throttle body would flow better something like this.
http://sdsefi.com/techinta.htm
The GT power simulation for the m20 shows up a decent pressure drop across the standard manifold
http://www.gtisoft.com/broch_gtpower.html
Check out the US fourms like rev3 or e30tech for the opinons on the extrude hone.
Ditch the AFM and go to alpha-n will give the best result for least spanner work. That's why it is very popular on s14's, even better if you go to stand alone.
Jason
Thats more like it.a log style manfold with a big throttle body would flow better something like this.
http://sdsefi.com/techinta.htm
-
Turbo-Brown
- Boost Junkie
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hants
- Contact:
Just make sure you don't point No.6 cylinder's intake straight at the servo like whoever made that has done!






