It has a fair few miles under its belt (191k!) Although it did have a top end rebuild 5k ago and the compression is still good
I really want to know how much power its making
Moderator: martauto

not bad figures for the agescot wrote:Right then here's the results!
First of all i'll tell you what i'm running.
Its a 1991 325i se coupe
Mongoose full stainless exhaust
Pipercross viper induction kit
159 bhp and 162 lbs of torque
Is this normal for a low compression engine?

its a rolling road so unless you have a brand new 325i equipped with a m20b25 to compare to then the results by themself are meaningless. Also a low comp m20b25 makes more than 150hpscot wrote:Yeah book figure is 171bhp but i've been led to believe tech2 engines have about 150bhp (ish) whereas tech1 has 170+bhp. Does anyone know if this is true??
Took the car to Well Lane in Batley to have the power run. Fella that did the run reckoned the Pipercross viper filters do give you a genuine increase in power (as per all the cars he's tested with them on)
Also i thought the mongoose exhaust did give more power than a standard system?
Anyway more to the point my engine has done 192k and as of this evening its back at the garage with another suspected cracked cylinder head![]()
It was only replaced 3 months ago so still under warranty!![]()
So that could explain the loss of power

First and foremost a dyno is a tuning tool and not one for determining accurate and realistic BHP numbers as a dyno number by itself us just a number (and each dyno reads differently) the number does not correlate directly to the "bhp" number that manufacturers claim (even despite power loss due to age/wear).scot wrote:Sorry reggid you've lost me!![]()
I take it you've got a tech 2 yourself?
ps. why are you up at this crazy hour?
Bloody hell thats a few miles from mereggid wrote:Sydney, Ozscot wrote:Cheers for that Reggid![]()
My car will be back on the same rollers as soon as its fixed (again!) So hopefully will see an increase.
Where are you based fella??