I think you answered your own question.Turbo-Brown wrote: If they don't add fuel on low load, and they don't add fuel at any other load, what do they do?
Jack shit by the sounds of that
Moderator: martauto

Problem with that arguement is that you could never use wide open throttle and full revs as you'd melt a piston. Power is power, regardless of engine size.Also I suppose you have to consider that they were 2.7 liter cars (correct me if that's wrong) and therefore under most conditions (i.e. where the injectors aren't maxxed out) the car could deliver power more strongly and could feel every inch the 180 or 190 or whatever it was they claimed!
Interesting / compelling no?Right, just gone over there and found the thread:
http://www.e30tech.com/forum/viewtopic. ... highlight=
From Topic: interesting fact about the m20b25 and its factory injectors.
So lets do the maths:the interesting thing i noticed while i was modding a rom file today is that that at WOT the injecotrs are at 95% pulse rate... most car companies wont run thier injectors above 80% to increase longevity, why would BMW do something so cheap... the injectors barely support the engine at 100% under high revs we all know the engine is very lean with the factory injectors... why would BMW do that?
149cc/min x 95%=141.55cc/min
((141.55cc/min)x6cyls)/5(rule of thumb)=169.86bhp which by my reckoning is about 1bhp shy of what BMW quoted for the M20B25.
You can see why I'm sceptical about vastly higher power claims on the standard fuel system!
Ah it works that way round!Turbo-Brown wrote:Thing about the standard FPR is that a sudden collapse in vacuum (i.e. pressure increase) should lead to a sudden increase in fuel pressure. The standard FPR is able to react pretty much instantaneously to changes in load. I'd guess that the sudden increase in duty of the injectors lead to the fuel pressure drop you observed.
Good point, no mileage in that idea then...Problem with that arguement is that you could never use wide open throttle and full revs as you'd melt a piston. Power is power, regardless of engine size.Also I suppose you have to consider that they were 2.7 liter cars (correct me if that's wrong) and therefore under most conditions (i.e. where the injectors aren't maxxed out) the car could deliver power more strongly and could feel every inch the 180 or 190 or whatever it was they claimed!
Yes indeed, 95% seems insane, no wonder my old injectors were past it!I've copied this over from the other thread on injectors:
Interesting / compelling no?Right, just gone over there and found the thread:
http://www.e30tech.com/forum/viewtopic. ... highlight=
From Topic: interesting fact about the m20b25 and its factory injectors.
So lets do the maths:the interesting thing i noticed while i was modding a rom file today is that that at WOT the injecotrs are at 95% pulse rate... most car companies wont run thier injectors above 80% to increase longevity, why would BMW do something so cheap... the injectors barely support the engine at 100% under high revs we all know the engine is very lean with the factory injectors... why would BMW do that?
149cc/min x 95%=141.55cc/min
((141.55cc/min)x6cyls)/5(rule of thumb)=169.86bhp which by my reckoning is about 1bhp shy of what BMW quoted for the M20B25.
You can see why I'm sceptical about vastly higher power claims on the standard fuel system!
reggid wrote:they use 0.5 for the bmfc which is an assumption it may be 0.4 or 0.6 nobody can tell you which it is for any particular car, you'll need an accurate engine dyno and diagnostic equipment. Those numbers may apply well to a big American V8 but not neccesarily to a small 6cyl BMWTurbo-Brown wrote:plugging the numbers into that site seems to support my arguement?reggid wrote:http://www.rceng.com/technical.htm
Anyone have anything to add about the injection system used (injector flow rate and pressure) on the Alpina and Hartge 2.7? That should tell us what the stock M20 units are capable of.