so come on guys which on would win? my mate has a slightly moddifed 900turbo and i have a bog standerd sport...whioch one wud win in a race? his a vid of the saab!
saab 900 turbo or e30!
Moderator: martauto
-
dodgydodger
- E30 Zone Newbie
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: Reading Berkshire
- Contact:
Took the mouth right outta my mouth matefuzzy wrote:instead of asking us go out and do it and you tell us who wins.
my oppinion the saab running right will win
www.oldskoolfantasy.co.uk
in the shit,the one to blame,yeh its all my fault ;)
in the shit,the one to blame,yeh its all my fault ;)
-
dodgydodger
- E30 Zone Newbie
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: Reading Berkshire
- Contact:
well i nealy top out at 140-145mph and so does the saab and we have raced down the motorway and sat nxt to each other practly but never done a standing stat race!
-
Brianmoooore
- E30 Zone Team Member
- Posts: 49358
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Depends if either of you can actually drive, and if we're talking aboout a proper race around twisty bits, or a boring drag race.dodgydodger wrote:so come on guys which on would win? my mate has a slightly moddifed 900turbo and i have a bog standerd sport...whioch one wud win in a race? 0
Depends wether its low pressure or high. A sport would eat a low pressure for brekky as its only 150bhp and extremey heavy! Id have a go at a low pressure in my IS!lol. High pressure would probably be a fair match or better as carlsons are extremely fast i know! Mon the sport though!
24v tech2
SAAB 
'91 Sterling Silver e30 320i SE
'96 Avus Blue e34 525i Sport
'92 Alpine White e30 318iS Touring
'86 Alpine White e28 M5 (008/187)
'02 Titan Silver e39 530d Sport Touring
'54 Cosmos Black e61 535d MSport Touring
'07 Sapphire Black e61 M5 Touring
[
'96 Avus Blue e34 525i Sport
'92 Alpine White e30 318iS Touring
'86 Alpine White e28 M5 (008/187)
'02 Titan Silver e39 530d Sport Touring
'54 Cosmos Black e61 535d MSport Touring
'07 Sapphire Black e61 M5 Touring
[
dude cant drive his own car so i reckon u got a fair chance.
plus u already win by having a rwd car that looks nice. that backwards engined peice of shit saab is one of the ugliest things i have ever seen. he obviously wishes it was rwd too by the poor attempt at some sort of power slide u should show him where the the hand brake is...
plus u already win by having a rwd car that looks nice. that backwards engined peice of shit saab is one of the ugliest things i have ever seen. he obviously wishes it was rwd too by the poor attempt at some sort of power slide u should show him where the the hand brake is...
-
E30BeemerLad
- Married to the E30 Zone
- Posts: 16806
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Norfolk
handbrake is on the front wheels on the saab, so that wouldn't induce any rear end shenanigans, but my money is on the saab winning hands down, even an 8V would give a sport a good run for it's money all day long, they handle quite well also, despite the weight.WerkdE30 wrote:dude cant drive his own car so i reckon u got a fair chance.
plus u already win by having a rwd car that looks nice. that backwards engined peice of shit saab is one of the ugliest things i have ever seen. he obviously wishes it was rwd too by the poor attempt at some sort of power slide u should show him where the the hand brake is...
Hand brake is on the rear wheels on the later 900's.
16v T is 185bhp @ 5700 or somthing iirc.
They are a hell of a lot heavier tho, but they do have the advantage of having the weight of the engine over the driven wheels. So if you can make a good start you should win in a drag race as the BM has much better torque than the old blown motor. However he will roar off the line because of the weight over the wheels. If it is a twisty circuit race the Saabs handle like comlete pigs, that's not to say they don't go around the corners, they just aren't as refined and composed when they do. So the BM sould win on that front, also you can out brake him easily as the BM has much more engine braking and much better brakes.
Essentially two well matched cars and it will basically depend on the driver.
It's interesting cos they are basically two completely different ways of doing eactly the same thing.
16v T is 185bhp @ 5700 or somthing iirc.
They are a hell of a lot heavier tho, but they do have the advantage of having the weight of the engine over the driven wheels. So if you can make a good start you should win in a drag race as the BM has much better torque than the old blown motor. However he will roar off the line because of the weight over the wheels. If it is a twisty circuit race the Saabs handle like comlete pigs, that's not to say they don't go around the corners, they just aren't as refined and composed when they do. So the BM sould win on that front, also you can out brake him easily as the BM has much more engine braking and much better brakes.
Essentially two well matched cars and it will basically depend on the driver.
It's interesting cos they are basically two completely different ways of doing eactly the same thing.
I currently own both models! Well a 325i cab (171 bhp 170 lb ft torque) not a sport which Widge is borrowing and a Saab 900 16 valve turbo 175 bhp but well over 200 lb ft of torque)
In a straight line the Saab wins hands down especially if it has a red box apc fitted as was fitted to the Carlsson. At 130 mph the Saab feels like it is running on rails whereas the beemer goes a little light and starts to run out of puff.
The 8 valve turbo (I had one before) is equally as quick although not as powerful it basically had a bigger turbo therefore greater turbo lag but when it kicked in it did with a thump. All that torque comes in at low revs too.
Over the twisty stuff the BMW is instantly at an advantage being reardrive with a tendancy to oversteer whereas the Saab will understeer although some careful left foot braking and throttle control keeps this in check.
They are basically two different driving experiences and both equally as fun to drive.
The brakes on the Saab in my opinion are as good as any it might be that when Widge borrowed mine the ABS was not working properly and the braking wasn't what it should be.
The are both classics of the future and I think a good 900 is equal to a good E30.
Hezicar
In a straight line the Saab wins hands down especially if it has a red box apc fitted as was fitted to the Carlsson. At 130 mph the Saab feels like it is running on rails whereas the beemer goes a little light and starts to run out of puff.
The 8 valve turbo (I had one before) is equally as quick although not as powerful it basically had a bigger turbo therefore greater turbo lag but when it kicked in it did with a thump. All that torque comes in at low revs too.
Over the twisty stuff the BMW is instantly at an advantage being reardrive with a tendancy to oversteer whereas the Saab will understeer although some careful left foot braking and throttle control keeps this in check.
They are basically two different driving experiences and both equally as fun to drive.
The brakes on the Saab in my opinion are as good as any it might be that when Widge borrowed mine the ABS was not working properly and the braking wasn't what it should be.
The are both classics of the future and I think a good 900 is equal to a good E30.
Hezicar
I rest my case! What muppet would opt for the Saab over the BM in that case?hezicar wrote: Over the twisty stuff the BMW is instantly at an advantage being reardrive with a tendancy to oversteer whereas the Saab will understeer although some careful left foot braking and throttle control keeps this in check.
Ok so if the Carlsson is supposed to be the quickest...
1989 Saab 900 Turbo Carlsson - Technical specifications
Displacement - 1985 cc
Compression ratio - 9.00:1
Fuel system - Bo LH-Jet fuel inj.
Aspiration - Turbo
Max. output - 185.0 bhp
Max. torque - 201 lbft
0-60mph - 8.00s
0-100mph - 21.50s
Power-to-weight - 143.41 bhp/ton
1986 BMW 325i - Technical specifications left out the bits we know!
Compression ratio - 9.70:1
0-60mph - 7.20s
0-100mph - 20.80s
Power-to-weight - 145.41 bhp/ton
And that's not even a sport as http://www.carfolio.com/ hasn't tested one.
Although the Carlsson had the red box APC controller the old Saab 900 's were always going to be let down by the fact they were using Bosch L Jetronic right up to the end of production. And the fact the snail is tiny
-
dodgydodger
- E30 Zone Newbie
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: Reading Berkshire
- Contact:
apoligies on my behalf as i wrote without thinking realy!
some details of the saab...its a 16v carlson turbo with this red box thing larger turbo than normal, trick injectors dont no to what tho, it has been ported and gas flowed, bored out(by what we dont no) massive front mounted intercooler.
on the brakes we have a larger bore marster cylinder, braided flexies green stuff pads and discs all round with 4 pots on the front!
the car has been poly bushed all round droped 80mm we think on the back and about 100mm i guess on the front!( it realy realy does sit low a bit impractal)
and the list is bigger but i cant rember lol!
and this would be racing a 171bhp standerd bmw on alpinas which are ment to make them handel like shit!
but never the less his driving abilates may be worse than myself so ill give it ago at santa pod on sunday!!
i do have a feeling who is going to win as the vid shows how much power this car has in 2nd gear by the smoke! but can he get the power to the floor without spining the wheels???
some details of the saab...its a 16v carlson turbo with this red box thing larger turbo than normal, trick injectors dont no to what tho, it has been ported and gas flowed, bored out(by what we dont no) massive front mounted intercooler.
on the brakes we have a larger bore marster cylinder, braided flexies green stuff pads and discs all round with 4 pots on the front!
the car has been poly bushed all round droped 80mm we think on the back and about 100mm i guess on the front!( it realy realy does sit low a bit impractal)
and the list is bigger but i cant rember lol!
and this would be racing a 171bhp standerd bmw on alpinas which are ment to make them handel like shit!
but never the less his driving abilates may be worse than myself so ill give it ago at santa pod on sunday!!
i do have a feeling who is going to win as the vid shows how much power this car has in 2nd gear by the smoke! but can he get the power to the floor without spining the wheels???
