http://www.jenvey.co.uk/products2/throt ... -kit-ckb02
Are these a worthwhile upgrade? Anyone got them, what sort of gains can be expected when matched to a 3.0 m52
Jenvey ITB's for M52
Moderator: martauto
-
reggid
- E30 Zone Squatter

- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Oz
TOFTT
i reckon youd be wanting a decent set of cams, a nice s50 6 branch in there to take advantage, none of the girly OEM stuff
i reckon youd be wanting a decent set of cams, a nice s50 6 branch in there to take advantage, none of the girly OEM stuff
E30 325is with M20B31
-
LondonTom
- E30 Zone Camper

- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:00 pm
Hoobs has/had a set on his m52.
-
Blitz
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 11151
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: East London+Basildon
It really is pointless. You might as well fit an S50.
-
ross_jsy
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 7307
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Jersey, C.I.
This. You would have essentially built an s50 that has worse performance than one, for about the same price as an s50 conversionBlitz wrote:It really is pointless. You might as well fit an S50.
-
bss325i
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 24532
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:00 pm
- Location: London/Surrey
The guy already had an M52 conversion in his E30 all be it B25.
danthes building him a B30 with schrick cams to address the above.
I guess the next logical step would be TB's.
Also the M52 has a VERY noticeable weight advantage.
danthes building him a B30 with schrick cams to address the above.
I guess the next logical step would be TB's.
Also the M52 has a VERY noticeable weight advantage.
-
Demlotcrew
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:00 pm
- Location: East Anglia
Truebss325i wrote:Also the M52 has a VERY noticeable power disadvantages.
-
LondonTom
- E30 Zone Camper

- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:00 pm
But then you could argue you might as well fit an s54...and so on.Blitz wrote:It really is pointless. You might as well fit an S50.
-
Demlotcrew
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:00 pm
- Location: East Anglia
That would be an argument you couldn't looseLondonTom wrote:But then you could argue you might as well fit an s54...and so on.Blitz wrote:It really is pointless. You might as well fit an S50.
-
DanThe
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 28649
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Staffs
Waste of time on an M52 IMO, I wouldnt want throttles without a plenum either
-
reggid
- E30 Zone Squatter

- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Oz
It’s my understanding that these were created for the US guys without access to the ”aproper”a S50B30 or S50B32, they have the S50B30US and S52B32 which are nothing but stroker M50/52’s.
There is an airbox for this ITB kit I’ve seen pics of it, but may not be in production yet. As Dan alluded to Throttles with no airbox work well on the dyno but it stops there”¦
There is an airbox for this ITB kit I’ve seen pics of it, but may not be in production yet. As Dan alluded to Throttles with no airbox work well on the dyno but it stops there”¦
E30 325is with M20B31
-
reggid
- E30 Zone Squatter

- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Oz
i do like the thought of the alloy block stroker with ITB but the non S5x are not reliable above 7000rpm and the valetrain is vastly inferior
E30 325is with M20B31


