motronic 1.3 for 325i which is good with high and low comp

Need technical Q/A then you're in the right place

Moderator: martauto

markus_74
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1078
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Kudus city, Indonesia

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:26 pm

hello,

need info again, as I build the engine with mixed parts and I don't know it will be high of low comp.

crankshaft from 325i 1989
piston and conrod from 525i 1990
engine block from 520i with bore up.

any info it will be high or low comp?

and I use motronic 1.3 engine loom and management, does it is good or not?

I mean that high and low comp engine which will give good combination and negative combination with motronic 1.3?

regards
markus
pacerpete
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 18165
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Iver heath. South bucks.

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:30 pm

IIRC, 1990 525i pistons = 8.8 CR.
Speedtouch
Old Skooler
Old Skooler
Posts: 14123
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Canterbury

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:46 pm

Yes, Motronic 1.3 is the later and best version to use. It has more resolution (map sites) than the previous versions, and gives an overall more refined control of the engine.

It will probably be the 'medium' compression; early high compressions were 9.7:1, then they went down to 9.4:1 then 8.8:1 for the later low compression engines in around 1992.
///M aurice
ECU Upgrade EPROM Chips, £40 posted within the UK. Note these are not Zone chips.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=279421
maggspower
Turbo Farmer Tractor Driver
Posts: 2376
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Nowhere near South Wales, ok butt

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:58 pm

As above motronic 1.3 is the best.

But I agree with Pete, most likely the pistons will be 8.8:1 comp ratio. The 9.4:1 pistons are relitivly rare, they were only around a short time '88-'89 approximately.
markus_74
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1078
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Kudus city, Indonesia

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 2:56 pm

thank you for all that give me info so it is low comp engine.

but which is best to get benefit to combine with motronic 1.3? low comp or high comp engine?
Speedtouch
Old Skooler
Old Skooler
Posts: 14123
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Canterbury

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 3:48 pm

It doesn't really matter; Motronic 1.3 was used with both versions. High compression engines usually give better throttle response, power and economy though.

However, being in Indonesia, it may be better to have a low compression engine if your fuel grade isn't so good...
///M aurice
ECU Upgrade EPROM Chips, £40 posted within the UK. Note these are not Zone chips.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=279421
markus_74
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1078
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Kudus city, Indonesia

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:08 pm

Speedtouch wrote:It doesn't really matter; Motronic 1.3 was used with both versions. High compression engines usually give better throttle response, power and economy though.

However, being in Indonesia, it may be better to have a low compression engine if your fuel grade isn't so good...
thank you for the info and how much the different in the power? does low comp can produce 171 hp? or far less?
Speedtouch
Old Skooler
Old Skooler
Posts: 14123
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Canterbury

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:10 pm

Some low compression engine M20B25s, such as bss325i's, produced the factory 170bhp, but most were around the 160bhp mark.
///M aurice
ECU Upgrade EPROM Chips, £40 posted within the UK. Note these are not Zone chips.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=279421
markus_74
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1078
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Kudus city, Indonesia

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:26 pm

Speedtouch wrote:Some low compression engine M20B25s, such as bss325i's, produced the factory 170bhp, but most were around the 160bhp mark.
11 bhp is a big different between low and high comp.

there are 3 fuel octan here 88, 92 and 97, and 88 is cheapest .

if I use high comp piston and use 88 fuel it will be detonation and not good for the engine.

but how to increase the power and fuel economy with low comp piston?
Speedtouch
Old Skooler
Old Skooler
Posts: 14123
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Canterbury

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:49 pm

AFAIK, the M20 engine needs at least 91 RON fuel to avoid pinking.

A chip will improve the low compression M20B25 considerably.
///M aurice
ECU Upgrade EPROM Chips, £40 posted within the UK. Note these are not Zone chips.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=279421
markus_74
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1078
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Kudus city, Indonesia

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 6:17 pm

Speedtouch wrote:AFAIK, the M20 engine needs at least 91 RON fuel to avoid pinking.

A chip will improve the low compression M20B25 considerably.
so if I use high comp what ron should I use? 95? or 91 is OK?

160 bhp with low comp + mild chip 10 bhp?
Speedtouch
Old Skooler
Old Skooler
Posts: 14123
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Canterbury

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 6:26 pm

Yes, 91 RON should be fine. The chip gives typical gains of 8-12bhp, but more importantly and noticeably will be the extra low-down torque, making for easier driveability and typical fuel consumption gains of 2-3mpg when driven sensibly.
///M aurice
ECU Upgrade EPROM Chips, £40 posted within the UK. Note these are not Zone chips.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=279421
User avatar
Brianmoooore
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 49360
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm

Post Wed Jul 30, 2014 6:53 pm

A low comp. M20B25 in good condition should and will produce 171 bhp. The drop in compression ratio was offset by the improvements in the management system that were introduced at the same time.
markus_74
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1078
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Kudus city, Indonesia

Post Thu Jul 31, 2014 5:58 am

thank you for all the info
User avatar
reggid
E30 Zone Squatter
E30 Zone Squatter
Posts: 1984
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Oz

Post Thu Jul 31, 2014 6:28 am

likely the lower comp engines lose more over time as the CR is lower but a fresh engine produces what BMW claimed which is 168BHP (SAE), 171bhp is the metric hp number (PS), also 125kW but it is the same amount of power just different units.

i would use the 9.7:1 piston if available and premium performance is wanted. they also respond better to a mild cam upgrade due to the better compression.
E30 325is with M20B31
User avatar
Acox99
E30 Zone Regular
E30 Zone Regular
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:00 pm
Location: Hurst green, east sussex

Post Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:48 am

On a low comp engine, what is the best way of changing the compression without changing pistons? Decking the block or skimming the head to effectively lower the combustion chamber area.
1989 E30 325i cab - long term project!
User avatar
Brianmoooore
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 49360
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm

Post Thu Jul 31, 2014 10:00 am

Pistons hit the head if you take off anything more than the skimming limit (dimples in the head face).
Replacement piston are the only way practical way to significantly increase CR.