It's done a bit of leg but its not a bad car for the money
Moderator: martauto
Nice! Bet they go well?

M50B25NonVanos & M52B28Vanos Heads for sale. Pm Me.
-
Topblag
- Old Skooler

- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Fife - You got a problem with that ?
They do, very quick for an oil burner from 2009. I understand they are also very reliable.Andy325i wrote:Nice! Bet they go well?
1990 325i Cab auto in Alpine White II
1988 Alpina C2.5 moredoor in Black, 71k
1990 325ix, moredoor auto in Laser Blue. 51k
1984 Hartge H35 in Black
2004 996 C4S in Silver 43k manual
2006 Audi S6 V10 in Black 58k
1988 Alpina C2.5 moredoor in Black, 71k
1990 325ix, moredoor auto in Laser Blue. 51k
1984 Hartge H35 in Black
2004 996 C4S in Silver 43k manual
2006 Audi S6 V10 in Black 58k
-
Rtaylor2208
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 3004
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:00 pm
- Location: Ayr, Ayrshire, Scotland
I was thinking the same, Bi-Turbos usually are up for alot more. We have been looking for a D3 Touring for about 8 months now.Simon13 wrote:thats mega cheap
A Bi-Turbo would be my choice but at the moment they are out of budget.
-
pacerpete
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 18168
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Iver heath. South bucks.
Rtaylor2208 wrote:I was thinking the same, Bi-Turbos usually are up for alot more. We have been looking for a D3 Touring for about 8 months now.Simon13 wrote:thats mega cheap
A Bi-Turbo would be my choice but at the moment they are out of budget.
Here you go, manual and all !
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BMW-ALPINA-2- ... 2771145%26
-
Simon13
- The longest resto in the world !
- Posts: 22697
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Camberley, Surrey don't u know
probably as its the same engine, alpina didn't really tune it much from standard iirc
I can't say i've seen much on the register forum about any problems and there are alot on there with D3's
I can't say i've seen much on the register forum about any problems and there are alot on there with D3's
-
Rtaylor2208
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 3004
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:00 pm
- Location: Ayr, Ayrshire, Scotland
Not keen on one with that sort of mileage, especially with the potential DPF huge bill. Does look nice though and in a good colour.pacerpete wrote:Rtaylor2208 wrote:I was thinking the same, Bi-Turbos usually are up for alot more. We have been looking for a D3 Touring for about 8 months now.Simon13 wrote:thats mega cheap
A Bi-Turbo would be my choice but at the moment they are out of budget.
Here you go, manual and all !![]()
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BMW-ALPINA-2- ... 2771145%26
-
Simon13
- The longest resto in the world !
- Posts: 22697
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Camberley, Surrey don't u know
if the car has done long journey ie motorway work the DPF lasts fine. Its short trips that f**ks them.
My father in law had an e90 330d manual from new and covered 160,000 in it and the DPF was fine. Hes just sold it
My father in law had an e90 330d manual from new and covered 160,000 in it and the DPF was fine. Hes just sold it
-
Rtaylor2208
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 3004
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:00 pm
- Location: Ayr, Ayrshire, Scotland
You do realise the bi-turbo D3 is a diesel? So is of no comparson to a naturally aspirated car.
Have you driven a turbo charged car in the last 10 years. Lag is not the issue it used to be in older cars.
Have you driven a turbo charged car in the last 10 years. Lag is not the issue it used to be in older cars.
You really are stupid aren't you?!pony wrote:All this bi turbo talk what about all the
Lag
Horrendous fuel economy
Packaging of the intercooler etc
Doesn't have the response of a Naturally Aspirated M Power ?
Lag? You obviously haven't driven any modern turbo cars if any turbo cars have you?
There is virtually no lag on an E9x 335i and even an E34 B10 Bi turbo has minimal lag and thats over 20 years old!
Horrendous fuel economy? What do you think one of the main reasons BMW are moving to turbo power for every engine they make including M power?
For better economy! The F10 M5 is over 25% more fuel efficient than the previous E6x M5.
And lastly, packaging of the intercooler? That's just a retarded reason to come up with.
As for responsiveness, an N54 twin turbo six cylinder engine from the early E9x 335i makes peak torque of 295 lbft from 1400 rpm all the way to 5000 rpm! (way more than an S54 and for a wider rev range!)
They are VERY responsive.
The Bi- turbo is based on the 123d's N47 engine so yes they can suffer the same problempnd wrote:Do these have the same timing chain problems as the 120d 320 +123d ?
The single turbo D3 is based on the M47 engine but that has its own problems.
owning an n54 135i I can say alot of issues hahaha
When it's running it's blisteringly quick with zero lag, anyone who's ever driven one will tell you it's like driving N/A. However wastegates are prone to rattling which necessitates a complete turbo swap to fix, also water pump and thermostat can give up without warning and it eats tyres...
When it's running it's blisteringly quick with zero lag, anyone who's ever driven one will tell you it's like driving N/A. However wastegates are prone to rattling which necessitates a complete turbo swap to fix, also water pump and thermostat can give up without warning and it eats tyres...
Yep, the above issues plus injectors and high pressure fuel pumps.SHeap wrote:owning an n54 135i I can say alot of issues hahaha
When it's running it's blisteringly quick with zero lag, anyone who's ever driven one will tell you it's like driving N/A. However wastegates are prone to rattling which necessitates a complete turbo swap to fix, also water pump and thermostat can give up without warning and it eats tyres...
-
Gert_8
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 11304
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: In your back passage faster than a rat up a drainpipe!
Ah, be nice to him, you know he's specialbss325i wrote:You really are stupid aren't you?!pony wrote:All this bi turbo talk what about all the
Lag
Horrendous fuel economy
Packaging of the intercooler etc
Doesn't have the response of a Naturally Aspirated M Power ?
Lag? You obviously haven't driven any modern turbo cars if any turbo cars have you?
There is virtually no lag on an E9x 335i and even an E34 B10 Bi turbo has minimal lag and thats over 20 years old!
Horrendous fuel economy? What do you think one of the main reasons BMW are moving to turbo power for every engine they make including M power?
For better economy! The F10 M5 is over 25% more fuel efficient than the previous E6x M5.
And lastly, packaging of the intercooler? That's just a retarded reason to come up with.
As for responsiveness, an N54 twin turbo six cylinder engine from the early E9x 335i makes peak torque of 295 lbft from 1400 rpm all the way to 5000 rpm! (way more than an S54 and for a wider rev range!)
They are VERY responsive.

PONY, 2013 - "Anyway span 360 degrees hitting the kerb and giving the old man two fingers as I was spinning like Michael Schumacher would
-
pony
- I have been misbehaving and am sorry !
- Posts: 6621
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: London
Errr .... I admit I haven't driven hardly any modern turbo petrol / diesel cars but I have driven a diesel not sure whether the 118d was turbo or not ?bss325i wrote:You really are stupid aren't you?!pony wrote:All this bi turbo talk what about all the
Lag
Horrendous fuel economy
Packaging of the intercooler etc
Doesn't have the response of a Naturally Aspirated M Power ?
Lag? You obviously haven't driven any modern turbo cars if any turbo cars have you?
There is virtually no lag on an E9x 335i and even an E34 B10 Bi turbo has minimal lag and thats over 20 years old!
Horrendous fuel economy? What do you think one of the main reasons BMW are moving to turbo power for every engine they make including M power?
For better economy! The F10 M5 is over 25% more fuel efficient than the previous E6x M5.
And lastly, packaging of the intercooler? That's just a retarded reason to come up with.
As for responsiveness, an N54 twin turbo six cylinder engine from the early E9x 335i makes peak torque of 295 lbft from 1400 rpm all the way to 5000 rpm! (way more than an S54 and for a wider rev range!)
They are VERY responsive.
But this hardly makes me stupid and is pretty presumptuous on yours and other parts.
I was merely recalling reading an interview with former BMW M boss Gerhard Riechter in 2000 about why the M engines chose M Power over turbo power. This interview is probably on the net somewhere and I was just merely recalling and questioning whether the issues the former BMW M mentioned eg lag, fuel economy etc were issues or not with these particular vehicles in question.
We aren't all know it all with cars
It makes you stupid for making such bold statements with out any experience.pony wrote: Errr .... I admit I haven't driven hardly any modern turbo petrol / diesel cars but I have driven a diesel not sure whether the 118d was turbo or not ?
But this hardly makes me stupid and is pretty presumptuous on yours and other parts.
That was 13 years ago and things have moved on just a bit since then. I f you read any of the more recent interviews with M engineers, you will find they quotes about having been able to engineer turbo cars to feel like high revving N/A cars.pony wrote:I was merely recalling reading an interview with former BMW M boss Gerhard Riechter in 2000 about why the M engines chose M Power over turbo power. This interview is probably on the net somewhere and I was just merely recalling and questioning whether the issues the former BMW M mentioned eg lag, fuel economy etc were issues or not with these particular vehicles in question.
And its true, they do!
You don't to be a "know it all" with cars to know that turbo technology have moved on considerably in the last 20 years.pony wrote:We aren't all know it all with cars
Instead of regurgitating stuff you've read off the web or in magazines, go out and get some real life experience.
-
ross_jsy
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 7307
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Jersey, C.I.
Stop using the term M power, it makes you look even more stupid. There is no magical thing called M powerpony wrote:I was merely recalling reading an interview with former BMW M boss Gerhard Riechter in 2000 about why the M engines chose M Power over turbo power.
-
e30topless
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 13598
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: surrounded by scrap
thanks for confirming my suspicions bazbss325i wrote:You really are stupid aren't you?!
I had a test drive in one of these when I was looking for my daily driver. It really does have bags of useable power and the Alpina wheels suit the E92 shape really well.
Ended up getting a 330i M Sport Coupe with the N53 engine though.
I don't do enough miles to justify a diesel and it was loads cheaper, a fair bit quicker (although needs to be worked a lot harder) and the fuel consumption is only marginally worse in mixed driving. The injectors and coil packs were swapped under recall because of a known issue, otherwise it's been fine. Even the road tax is only £25 a year more than the D3
Also, although you'd pay a premium for the D3 over an M Sport the ones supplied in this country are generally fairly low spec. This one is based on an SE not an M Sport so doesn't have the Aero Bodywork which looks much better in the flesh. It also doesn't even have climate control, just twirly knob air con which is pretty poor for a pricy motor like this, and I'd bet it doesn't have cruise, steering wheel gearshift or DAB like it says in the ad either.
Ended up getting a 330i M Sport Coupe with the N53 engine though.
I don't do enough miles to justify a diesel and it was loads cheaper, a fair bit quicker (although needs to be worked a lot harder) and the fuel consumption is only marginally worse in mixed driving. The injectors and coil packs were swapped under recall because of a known issue, otherwise it's been fine. Even the road tax is only £25 a year more than the D3
Also, although you'd pay a premium for the D3 over an M Sport the ones supplied in this country are generally fairly low spec. This one is based on an SE not an M Sport so doesn't have the Aero Bodywork which looks much better in the flesh. It also doesn't even have climate control, just twirly knob air con which is pretty poor for a pricy motor like this, and I'd bet it doesn't have cruise, steering wheel gearshift or DAB like it says in the ad either.


