Does RAM air work on cars or just bikes?

General E30 related discussions -
Please put technical questions in E30 Tech Help forum below

Moderator: martauto

Post Reply
fearlessphil
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:34 pm

Im new to cars, mostly had sports bikes an vans up till now and its got me thinking.

Nearly all sports bikes have some sort of RAM air forced induction but ive never seen it on a car?

Any reason for this, simple cocept on a bike i thought it would have been the same for cars?
Barx325i
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6493
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:51 pm

it's all there, only on a bike they put a sign pointing out where the air goes in :)

I think for the power to weight / speed / drag factor of a bike - the air being forced in at 80+ mph does make a difference..
HairyScreech
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6265
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:53 pm

Yes but as with bikes the ram effect is so small its not worth the effort, we worked out the actual pressure increase in uni once and its pathetic.
2.8 development thread http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... c&t=170822

m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&
DanThe
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 28641
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Staffs
Contact:

Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:57 pm

Any idea what the figures are for pressures from differing intake areas screech?
HairyScreech
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6265
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 12, 2012 10:05 pm

not off the top of my head, i think we had a .5m^2 opening in the calc and it was less than 5 psi benefit, might have been less than 1psi, either way you would be looking at turning the whole front of the car into a scoop for it to work.
2.8 development thread http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... c&t=170822

m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&
Barx325i
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6493
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 12, 2012 10:08 pm

on a bike, depending on the rev's and given the drag / weight, I guess they felt it worthy to try advertising the fact without the fear of being shot down and trade description liability.. Just
HairyScreech
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6265
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 12, 2012 10:18 pm

pretty much, it was a gimic to sell bikes.

if one claims ram air for more power then you will buy that vs one that doesn't have it, its kind of why it has faded away a lot on bikes as well.
2.8 development thread http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... c&t=170822

m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&
Barx325i
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6493
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 12, 2012 10:22 pm

I thought due to the relative small capacity when these things reach high speeds an appropriately shaped duct would be pressurising the air sufficiently.. however these things would probably surpass the figures pretty quickly becuse they rev to 16k fairly quickly.. I guess in this case, only at the limit of speed where they're hanging on in top gear it may be of benefit, or alternatively comletely useless, as stated..
HairyScreech
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6265
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 12, 2012 10:29 pm

thing is 200hp needs 200hp worth of air to combine with 200hp worth of fuel, the bike will have less losses but its not enough to make a huge difference unless you compare a huge american truck engine to a bike.

As you say, the faster you go the better it is, however you are talking over 100mph for a measurable difference and salt flat speeds to feel it.
2.8 development thread http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... c&t=170822

m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&
Barx325i
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6493
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 12, 2012 10:34 pm

marketable, but unattainable gains for most of the known polpulation seemingly
appletree
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 3482
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Retford

Sun Aug 12, 2012 11:54 pm

DanThe wrote:Any idea what the figures are for pressures from differing intake areas screech?
Sure there was somthing in one of James Mays programs and a somthing like 164mph it was equal to a 2bhp increase with direct airflow to the inlet.

Either way it was about a much use as an electric supercharger.
Image

You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity

M42 Supercharged 285bhp + M3 6speed box
appletree
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 3482
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Retford

Sun Aug 12, 2012 11:54 pm

DanThe wrote:Any idea what the figures are for pressures from differing intake areas screech?
Sure there was somthing in one of James Mays programs and a somthing like 164mph it was equal to a 2bhp increase with direct airflow to the inlet.

Either way it was about a much use as an electric supercharger.
Image

You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity

M42 Supercharged 285bhp + M3 6speed box
HairyScreech
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6265
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:00 pm

Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:33 am

^^ that makes me think my memory of less than 1hp at 100mph was correct then.
2.8 development thread http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... c&t=170822

m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&
Barx325i
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6493
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:00 pm

Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:31 am

heresay to a point until proven I guess - As for bikes I'd say it's pretty relevent..

cars, nah nev's - whatevah man....fuck
HairyScreech
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6265
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:00 pm

Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:58 am

its even less relevant on bikes, they have about a 6" square inlet between the head lights, this intake has no where near enough area for the pressure infront of a bike to achieve anything.

Like i say we worked it out in a lecture a year or so back, i would have to find my notes to say anything for sure but the difference in air density was next to nothing, it actually surprised me how little an effect it would have.

a quick google of "ram air myth" will give lots of discussion on the topic, a good explanation of why a gain occurs is here
http://xlforum.net/vbportal/forums/arch ... 37320.html
However it is clear the effect is not "ram air" but more to do with the design constraints of a motorcycle.
lots of good discussion of this on speed talk as well as actual testing, benefits below 150mph come mainly from getting atmospheric air in.
http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8810
http://www.speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3003
2.8 development thread http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... c&t=170822

m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&
Post Reply