Stock camber front and rear

Need technical Q/A then you're in the right place

Moderator: martauto

User avatar
Jozi
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 3076
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Post Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:45 am

Am I right in saying these value's are correct for camber:

Front: 1deg 10min
Rear: 2deg 30min

Both for a car with mtec springs.

If I lower the car a bit should I be aiming for the same value's? Or get it within spec at normal ride heights? I've got camber/toe plates on the rear beam and adjustable top mounts up front.
User avatar
Jozi
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 3076
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:07 am

Nobody then?
Grrrmachine
E30 Zone Wiki / Team Member
E30 Zone Wiki / Team Member
Posts: 8043
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:28 am

I had my geometry done a year ago and the rear tolerances were:

Camber tolerance is -2.30 to -1.30
Toe tolerance is -0.04 to 0.26

I've no idea about lowering though. I never got any answers when I asked about suspension either :?
User avatar
Jozi
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 3076
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:36 pm

Are those figures for front and rear? I've searched a little but couldn't find anything definitive, I'll try to keep it factory at which ever ride height I'll have unless there are better figures (for a road car)?
DanThe
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 28649
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Staffs

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:24 pm

Im not 100% but im sure 1.5 neg camber at the rear is whats recommended, id go for parallel rear wheels on a road car
HairyScreech
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6265
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:00 pm

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:35 pm

-1.5 is a figure recommended for a lot of road stuff.

-1.3 to -2.3 sounds like a lot of camber for a standard car to be running though, however the metc springs will wind a bit more than normal on at the rear.
2.8 development thread http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... c&t=170822

m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&
User avatar
Jozi
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 3076
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:46 pm

DanThe wrote: id go for parallel rear wheels on a road car
Parallel as in perpendicular to the road or parallel with the car for 0 toe?

I'll aim for 1.5 deg camber on the rear at ride height.

Now to hope my wheels will fit with camber set to that and no arch rolling is required!
DanThe
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 28649
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Staffs

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:54 pm

Ive not measured my rear camber, just adjusted it out as much as possible to keep the tyre off the great big fooking chromie arch :-x
User avatar
Jozi
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 3076
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:06 pm

This is where I'm at with a little camber as possible
Image

I can't find pics with the arches rolled a little but it goes up another bit more, goes up even further with loads of camber.

Do chromies not have a bit more room because of the higher arches?
DanThe
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 28649
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Staffs

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:19 pm

No, the chroime arch is a 90° fold all the way round, facelift arch folds back on itself at the top part which gives more tyre clearance
User avatar
Jozi
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 3076
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:32 pm

You could roll them a little and create a little more room?
kam-325i
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 4851
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: TELFORD !!!! (Shropshire) Stevetigger Land !!!

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:35 pm

DanThe wrote:No, the chroime arch is a 90° fold all the way round, facelift arch folds back on itself at the top part which gives more tyre clearance
My facelift had the 90° fold all round the wheel arch, i cut it off because its a right shit trap....
Pete don't care about colour, He would shag a rainbow if he could find the end of it....
Image
DanThe
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 28649
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Staffs

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:56 pm

Must have had replacement arches?

I would roll mine Jozi but they are like new, if I split the paint I would probably cut my wrists :eek:
kam-325i
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 4851
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: TELFORD !!!! (Shropshire) Stevetigger Land !!!

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:59 pm

DanThe wrote:Must have had replacement arches?
nah, definatly original, in the process of replacing the inner arch's now...
Pete don't care about colour, He would shag a rainbow if he could find the end of it....
Image
User avatar
Jozi
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 3076
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Post Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:31 pm

DanThe wrote: I would roll mine Jozi but they are like new, if I split the paint I would probably cut my wrists :eek:
I thought you might say that :) And I think your dead right in keeping it as is!

Both my tourings had the lip folded at the top, I put it down to previous owners running wheels that were to wide.
DanThe
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 28649
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Staffs

Post Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:37 am

All facelifts have the double fold at the top of the arch, thats what I was getting at