pac1982 wrote:I don’t drive fast anymore and rarely get above 4k revs I would be just as happy driving a 316
pac1982 wrote:hence my want for a 2.8 24v conversion
Moderator: martauto

pac1982 wrote:I don’t drive fast anymore and rarely get above 4k revs I would be just as happy driving a 316
pac1982 wrote:hence my want for a 2.8 24v conversion

Because I like the idea of driving a classic car with a modern and reliable engine plus doing a 2.8 conversion is no harder than doing a 2.5 so if I’m gonna do it I may as well do it properlyMrBenn wrote:So why do an M52 conversion?pac1982 wrote:I don’t drive fast anymore and rarely get above 4k revs I would be just as happy driving a 316

This makes absolutely no sense at all!pac1982 wrote:If you’re an OEM homo and want a really nice clean original E30 then the 325 wins hands down.
If you want a practical daily driver then the 318IS wins.

I know why you want to do it, it just sounded a bit odd.pac1982 wrote:Because I like the idea of driving a classic car with a modern and reliable engine plus doing a 2.8 conversion is no harder than doing a 2.5 so if I’m gonna do it I may as well do it properlyMrBenn wrote:So why do an M52 conversion?pac1982 wrote:I don’t drive fast anymore and rarely get above 4k revs I would be just as happy driving a 316
All E30 engines are reliable if maintained correctly.pac1982 wrote:Because I like the idea of driving a classic car with a modern and reliable engine plus doing a 2.8 conversion is no harder than doing a 2.5 so if I’m gonna do it I may as well do it properlyMrBenn wrote:So why do an M52 conversion?pac1982 wrote:I don’t drive fast anymore and rarely get above 4k revs I would be just as happy driving a 316

bss325i wrote:This makes absolutely no sense at all!pac1982 wrote:If you’re an OEM homo and want a really nice clean original E30 then the 325 wins hands down.
If you want a practical daily driver then the 318IS wins.

Tell me exactly why a 325i wins hands down if you want a clean and original E30?!pac1982 wrote:bss325i wrote:This makes absolutely no sense at all!pac1982 wrote:If you’re an OEM homo and want a really nice clean original E30 then the 325 wins hands down.
If you want a practical daily driver then the 318IS wins.
Whys that?

As said above i want a nice low miles modern engine just becuase i dont drive fast anymore dont mean i dont like the odd traffic light grand prix once in a while.bss325i wrote:All E30 engines are reliable if maintained correctly.pac1982 wrote:Because I like the idea of driving a classic car with a modern and reliable engine plus doing a 2.8 conversion is no harder than doing a 2.5 so if I’m gonna do it I may as well do it properlyMrBenn wrote: So why do an M52 conversion?
Again, why would you do a 2.5 conversion if you dont drive fast any more?

Not as much as nice clean original unmolested examples.pac1982 wrote:On top of that E30's with a 24v conversion seem to be worth good money so i see it as a good investment.

Because if you’re a OEM homo you want everything to be original and as good as it can be I’ll admit a proper BMW isn’t really worth its salt unless it has two things 1, Leather and 2, a 6 pot under the hood.bss325i wrote:Tell me exactly why a 325i wins hands down if you want a clean and original E30?!pac1982 wrote:bss325i wrote: This makes absolutely no sense at all!
Whys that?


Really?! I think the money is in clean unmolested e30's tbh, in a few years there won't be any left!pac1982 wrote: On top of that E30's with a 24v conversion seem to be worth good money so i see it as a good investment.

I've seen many a clean well spec'ed E30 with a 24v conversion sell for around the 4 grand mark, either way gotta be worth more than the £1500 give or take my 318IS is worth at the moment.MrBenn wrote:Really?! I think the money is in clean unmolested e30's tbh, in a few years there won't be any left!pac1982 wrote: On top of that E30's with a 24v conversion seem to be worth good money so i see it as a good investment.


which bit dont you agree with the leather or the 6 pot?MrBenn wrote:Jeez you talk crap!pac1982 wrote:
BMW isn’t really worth its salt unless it has to things 1, Leather and 2, a 6 pot under the hood.

No this is absolute rubbish!pac1982 wrote:Because if you’re a OEM homo you want everything to be original and as good as it can be I’ll admit a proper BMW isn’t really worth its salt unless it has to things 1, Leather and 2, a 6 pot under the hood.bss325i wrote:Tell me exactly why a 325i wins hands down if you want a clean and original E30?!pac1982 wrote:
Whys that?
So unless you’re gonna push the boat out and go for one of the rarer models the 325 is the best choice for a diehard OEM enthusiast
Does that make more sence or you need imput?
+1000000!!!MrBenn wrote:Jeez you talk crap!pac1982 wrote:
BMW isn’t really worth its salt unless it has to things 1, Leather and 2, a 6 pot under the hood.

bss325i wrote:So you admit, a propper BMW has to have a 6 pot?


And plenty that struggle to sell for around 1k (I've had one)pac1982 wrote: I've seen many a clean well spec'ed E30 with a 24v conversion sell for around the 4 grand mark, either way gotta be worth more than the £1500 give or take my 318IS is worth at the moment.

I’m talking ideal world here if someone told you they would build you your dream E30 and it wouldn’t cost you a penny, and then I’m sure most would have a 6 pot engine and a tasty leather interior.MrBenn wrote:And plenty that struggle to sell for around 1k (I've had one)pac1982 wrote: I've seen many a clean well spec'ed E30 with a 24v conversion sell for around the 4 grand mark, either way gotta be worth more than the £1500 give or take my 318IS is worth at the moment.
People will always be scared of molested cars, who knows what standard the works been done to?
I don't like leather and it doesn't have to have 6 pots for me to like it, just like you said, I like the retro looks, nobody knows whats under the bonnet.


If thats supposed to be an insult to the 318IS surely its an insult to E30's in general regardless of engine size he drives an E30 so we can all hang our head in shamedarkchild wrote:Is it true that Joey Deacon had a 318is?


"Zorst" (how council) will not net you any gains, the 318iS system from the manifold back is regarded to be as good as it will get.Royalratch wrote:Andyoboy - the 318ti is the gayest piece of crap ever. It's a girls car.
Barry - I reckon a zorst, big bore throttle and remap will see 160bhp and a superior driving experience.
Well that rules out the E30 M3 doesn't it?bss325i wrote:+1000000!!!MrBenn wrote:Jeez you talk crap!pac1982 wrote:
BMW isn’t really worth its salt unless it has to things 1, Leather and 2, a 6 pot under the hood.

I have an IS and there is nothing an IS can win, i just think it gets to much hate, its a good little car in its own right end offsenna wrote:Well that rules out the E30 M3 doesn't it?bss325i wrote:+1000000!!!MrBenn wrote: Jeez you talk crap!
I have a feeling that the only reason that more people like the 325i over the 318iS is that so many more were produced and therefore owned. Few 325i owners will admit to wanting an iS and as there are more of them then iS owners the iS owners will never win.

No. iS owners get so much stick because they always harp on about them being the better car. 325i Owners (some of which have owned iS's) put them strait and it then turns into a 10 page thread as per usual.senna wrote:Well that rules out the E30 M3 doesn't it?bss325i wrote:+1000000!!!MrBenn wrote: Jeez you talk crap!
I have a feeling that the only reason that more people like the 325i over the 318iS is that so many more were produced and therefore owned. Few 325i owners will admit to wanting an iS and as there are more of them then iS owners the iS owners will never win.

I dont hate 318iS's, i think they are a cool enough car in their own right.pac1982 wrote:I have an IS and there is nothing an IS can win, i just think it gets to much hate, its a good little car in its own right end off
This!!bss325i wrote:I dont hate 318iS's, i think they are a cool enough car in their own right.pac1982 wrote:I have an IS and there is nothing an IS can win, i just think it gets to much hate, its a good little car in its own right end off
I just hate delusional iS owners with the notions of unfounded superiority over a model clearly a cut above in nearly every way.

It is superior though..Royalratch wrote:Nah Barry - dead wrong.
iS owners only respond to give 325i owners a reality check who think their car is 5 times as fast and superior in every way - which is incorrect.
325i = Dated rubber band engine, crap spec as standard. All iS' have Sport goodness as standard.
Get with the programme. The iS is as fast and better overall except you lot got/get raped at the dealer and pump for the privilege of getting to Tesco 0.258sec sooner/smoother - whoopee.

Don’t get me wrong as I said before I know a 325 is a faster and better car but you’re just being delusional or just in denial if you think you can match or get anywhere near a 318IS mpg in a 2.5 unless you drive like GhandiJhonno wrote:It is superior though..Royalratch wrote:Nah Barry - dead wrong.
iS owners only respond to give 325i owners a reality check who think their car is 5 times as fast and superior in every way - which is incorrect.
325i = Dated rubber band engine, crap spec as standard. All iS' have Sport goodness as standard.
Get with the programme. The iS is as fast and better overall except you lot got/get raped at the dealer and pump for the privilege of getting to Tesco 0.258sec sooner/smoother - whoopee.
Is is NOT anywhere near as fast, numbers and laws of physics dictate this.. I have already proven you don't, I got basically the same MPG from my 325i Touring as I do my M42, but was quicker, cooler and better sounding.


Are you really that botherd about fuel economy, or is it an excuse to say an m42 is betterpac1982 wrote:Don’t get me wrong as I said before I know a 325 is a faster and better car but you’re just being delusional or just in denial if you think you can match or get anywhere near a 318IS mpg in a 2.5 unless you drive like GhandiJhonno wrote:It is superior though..Royalratch wrote:Nah Barry - dead wrong.
iS owners only respond to give 325i owners a reality check who think their car is 5 times as fast and superior in every way - which is incorrect.
325i = Dated rubber band engine, crap spec as standard. All iS' have Sport goodness as standard.
Get with the programme. The iS is as fast and better overall except you lot got/get raped at the dealer and pump for the privilege of getting to Tesco 0.258sec sooner/smoother - whoopee.
Is is NOT anywhere near as fast, numbers and laws of physics dictate this.. I have already proven you don't, I got basically the same MPG from my 325i Touring as I do my M42, but was quicker, cooler and better sounding.
I have had both.. How about that for a revelation. I have always calculated my MPG, and have if anything calmed my driving down since owning my 325ipac1982 wrote:Don’t get me wrong as I said before I know a 325 is a faster and better car but you’re just being delusional or just in denial if you think you can match or get anywhere near a 318IS mpg in a 2.5 unless you drive like GhandiJhonno wrote:It is superior though..Royalratch wrote:Nah Barry - dead wrong.
iS owners only respond to give 325i owners a reality check who think their car is 5 times as fast and superior in every way - which is incorrect.
325i = Dated rubber band engine, crap spec as standard. All iS' have Sport goodness as standard.
Get with the programme. The iS is as fast and better overall except you lot got/get raped at the dealer and pump for the privilege of getting to Tesco 0.258sec sooner/smoother - whoopee.
Is is NOT anywhere near as fast, numbers and laws of physics dictate this.. I have already proven you don't, I got basically the same MPG from my 325i Touring as I do my M42, but was quicker, cooler and better sounding.