Considering results at Santa Pod from the last few years, your M30 anchor must be a massive disappointment for you every time you drive itRav335uk wrote:Was that it?E30BeemerLad wrote:This was my touring with the M52 getting some 3rd gear action, the chromie should feel & go even better
[youtube][/youtube]
Is the M50 route worth the hassle?
Moderator: martauto
-
Jhonno
- Homo Hair
- Posts: 20362
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: FLAT, FLAT, FLAT!!
- Contact:
-
E30BeemerLad
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 16806
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Norfolk
14.52 down the 1/4 Rav. The only M30 slugger I've seen doing better than that was Andy with the Green M30 Touring, but that was on throttle bodies etc and doing about 260bhp IIRC
-
Rav335uk
- E30 Zone Meets/Events Team

- Posts: 27985
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Mad mad mad
- Contact:
You too!!!Alex wrote:You must take your 8.5 tonne e30 down the strip this year Rav![]()
Fuckin' hell it's like the "Invasion of the Bodysnatchers"

If you Got "Haters",Then your doing something Right!
CR24v??? Where's it all gone?? LOL
-
Alex
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 22666
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
I did 16.4 secondsRav335uk wrote:You too!!!Alex wrote:You must take your 8.5 tonne e30 down the strip this year Rav![]()
![]()
Fuckin' hell it's like the "Invasion of the Bodysnatchers"
I'am debating wether or not to come fully stripped this year
-
Rav335uk
- E30 Zone Meets/Events Team

- Posts: 27985
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Mad mad mad
- Contact:
Ah Throttle boddies, I have some of those of an M88E30BeemerLad wrote:14.52 down the 1/4 Rav. The only M30 slugger I've seen doing better than that was Andy with the Green M30 Touring, but that was on throttle bodies etc and doing about 260bhp IIRC
just on the hunt for a 288 cam, and MS

If you Got "Haters",Then your doing something Right!
CR24v??? Where's it all gone?? LOL
-
Jhonno
- Homo Hair
- Posts: 20362
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: FLAT, FLAT, FLAT!!
- Contact:
How is it blinkered to state fact?!Rav335uk wrote:Why would it be, i'm happy with it, I take it you have 24V blinkers on all the time then
You M30 girls have been slower than the 24v boys at the Pod the last few years..
-
Rav335uk
- E30 Zone Meets/Events Team

- Posts: 27985
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Mad mad mad
- Contact:
Yes we M30 BOYS have proper cars not lightweight poverty spec ones with plasic engines in them.Jhonno wrote:How is it blinkered to state fact?!Rav335uk wrote:Why would it be, i'm happy with it, I take it you have 24V blinkers on all the time then
You M30 girls have been slower than the 24v boys at the Pod the last few years..

If you Got "Haters",Then your doing something Right!
CR24v??? Where's it all gone?? LOL
-
Jhonno
- Homo Hair
- Posts: 20362
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: FLAT, FLAT, FLAT!!
- Contact:
Rav... You drive a baby blue convertible that weighs as much as a planet. How is that a proper car?!Rav335uk wrote:Yes we M30 BOYS have proper cars not lightweight poverty spec ones with plasic engines in them.Jhonno wrote:How is it blinkered to state fact?!Rav335uk wrote:Why would it be, i'm happy with it, I take it you have 24V blinkers on all the time then
You M30 girls have been slower than the 24v boys at the Pod the last few years..
Extra weight does not a decent car make.
-
Rav335uk
- E30 Zone Meets/Events Team

- Posts: 27985
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Mad mad mad
- Contact:
True, but not all of us have a point to prove.Jhonno wrote:Rav... You drive a baby blue convertible that weighs as much as a planet. How is that a proper car?!Rav335uk wrote:Yes we M30 BOYS have proper cars not lightweight poverty spec ones with plasic engines in them.Jhonno wrote: How is it blinkered to state fact?!
You M30 girls have been slower than the 24v boys at the Pod the last few years..
Extra weight does not a decent car make.

If you Got "Haters",Then your doing something Right!
CR24v??? Where's it all gone?? LOL
-
Rav335uk
- E30 Zone Meets/Events Team

- Posts: 27985
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Mad mad mad
- Contact:
There you go, munbers, point to prove.Jhonno wrote:I personally have no point to make, the numbers do the talking..Rav335uk wrote:True, but not all of us have a point to prove.

If you Got "Haters",Then your doing something Right!
CR24v??? Where's it all gone?? LOL
-
325isporttech1
- E30 Zone Camper

- Posts: 1196
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Telford, Shropshire
- Contact:
-
Rav335uk
- E30 Zone Meets/Events Team

- Posts: 27985
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Mad mad mad
- Contact:
Someone who sees the light325isporttech1 wrote:+1Yes we M30 BOYS have proper cars not lightweight poverty spec ones with plasic engines in them.Im running an m30 in a e34 touring and im loving it..even if it the car does way 2 tonne. A proper engine thow not like the m50 plastique

If you Got "Haters",Then your doing something Right!
CR24v??? Where's it all gone?? LOL
-
Rav335uk
- E30 Zone Meets/Events Team

- Posts: 27985
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Mad mad mad
- Contact:
Come on Dan, there's no brainwashing going on hereDanThe wrote:More like you have brain washed him Rav

If you Got "Haters",Then your doing something Right!
CR24v??? Where's it all gone?? LOL
-
d6dph
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 12435
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Tiptree. Essex
Give it a rest please Rav, You seem to do this on every M5x thread.
M30 was the one to do a few years ago, but it's a no brainer to go with a more advanced engine like the m5x series. 4v per cyl and more effective control systems are more suited to most.
M30 was the one to do a few years ago, but it's a no brainer to go with a more advanced engine like the m5x series. 4v per cyl and more effective control systems are more suited to most.

-
Rav335uk
- E30 Zone Meets/Events Team

- Posts: 27985
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Mad mad mad
- Contact:
Sorry Dave, but I didn't mention the M30 on here till later.penton08 wrote:overall.... yes a m50'd car is going to be quicker. but 20 bhp is not alot in the real world. ive been around a few m50 coverted cars and they seem to go alright but why bother with a engine swap for alright? you may aswell do a m30 swaptown325i wrote:He must of had a shitter of an engine then because from my experience of an M50 converted E30 is that it goes really well compared to an M20 engine.![]()
And as "on every M5x post" yes, taking the stick on the engine is ok with you then?

If you Got "Haters",Then your doing something Right!
CR24v??? Where's it all gone?? LOL
- Mikey_Boy
- E30 Zone Regular

- Posts: 996
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Cheshire - trying to avoid the bling!
So anyway - to get back to the thread!!
Dare I say that the whole M20 / M5x engine debate depends ultimately on personal preference? The M5x engines are fantastic and once you have gotten your head around the installation, then it makes a lot of sense to do it..
But... I run an M20 for trackdays and yes, it was a bit lethargic until I got a BTB exhaust on it and MAF conversion - now she makes a bit more power and responds much much better, dare I say up to about 6k and a bit... Sure - it needs more hp (2.7/2.8 with a cam etc) but the grunt coming out of slow corners (good old 2 valve torque!) makes for a not bad compromise. Let's also not forget that M20's are geared very long with big spacing between the gears - makes for a lethargic feel as well (which is why I am slotting in a 262CR box when rebuild funds allow!) Plus there is a stubborn part of me that wants to keep the character of the car as intact as possible whilst persuading a few more ponies to come out to play! A-Tech 2.7 with 230hp anyone??
This thread shows that this debate can run on and on - the only common thing is that either route costs and takes time!
Cheers,
Mikey_Boy
Dare I say that the whole M20 / M5x engine debate depends ultimately on personal preference? The M5x engines are fantastic and once you have gotten your head around the installation, then it makes a lot of sense to do it..
But... I run an M20 for trackdays and yes, it was a bit lethargic until I got a BTB exhaust on it and MAF conversion - now she makes a bit more power and responds much much better, dare I say up to about 6k and a bit... Sure - it needs more hp (2.7/2.8 with a cam etc) but the grunt coming out of slow corners (good old 2 valve torque!) makes for a not bad compromise. Let's also not forget that M20's are geared very long with big spacing between the gears - makes for a lethargic feel as well (which is why I am slotting in a 262CR box when rebuild funds allow!) Plus there is a stubborn part of me that wants to keep the character of the car as intact as possible whilst persuading a few more ponies to come out to play! A-Tech 2.7 with 230hp anyone??
This thread shows that this debate can run on and on - the only common thing is that either route costs and takes time!
Cheers,
Mikey_Boy
-
bmwsport
- E30 Zone Camper

- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 11:00 pm
- Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
Count me inRav335uk wrote:Someone who sees the light325isporttech1 wrote:+1Yes we M30 BOYS have proper cars not lightweight poverty spec ones with plasic engines in them.Im running an m30 in a e34 touring and im loving it..even if it the car does way 2 tonne. A proper engine thow not like the m50 plastique
I guess for me to be cool i better swap out my M30 and put in one of those plastique 24 valver things... According to some that's the best thing to do period, i'm sure it will increase it's value too
'85 Hartge H28


-
Jhonno
- Homo Hair
- Posts: 20362
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: FLAT, FLAT, FLAT!!
- Contact:
WTF are you chatting about?bmwsport wrote:Count me inRav335uk wrote:Someone who sees the light325isporttech1 wrote: +1Im running an m30 in a e34 touring and im loving it..even if it the car does way 2 tonne. A proper engine thow not like the m50 plastique
![]()
I guess for me to be cool i better swap out my M30 and put in one of those plastique 24 valver things... According to some that's the best thing to do period, i'm sure it will increase it's value too
-
bmwsport
- E30 Zone Camper

- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 11:00 pm
- Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
The whole M50 vs M30 thing is getting really old and repetitive. I'm sure the original poster was asking if he should keep his EXISTING M20 or replace it with an M50 but somehow the thread turns into another M50/M30 slagging match... My comment was to just take the peepee as these threads are becoming very tiresome and unneccessary.
M30 E30's are what they are and so are those with M50 power, each car is very different and both have good and bad points but at the end of the day it's all down to personal preferences. For me i don't care about stats it's more about originality/engines of the same period. 1/4 mile runs, bhp, torque, lack of rpm above 6k rpm means nothing to me, the car is what it is and should be kept in A1 original mechanical condition, some people like myself don't care 'if' the M50 is a better overall engine but there is no denying the M30/M20 has a better soundtrack!
This factor alone is enough to keep a smile on my face and makes up for the extra (if any) fuel costs and the M30 isn't exactly slow and will keep up with most modern cars (within reason) on the roads today.
M30 E30's are what they are and so are those with M50 power, each car is very different and both have good and bad points but at the end of the day it's all down to personal preferences. For me i don't care about stats it's more about originality/engines of the same period. 1/4 mile runs, bhp, torque, lack of rpm above 6k rpm means nothing to me, the car is what it is and should be kept in A1 original mechanical condition, some people like myself don't care 'if' the M50 is a better overall engine but there is no denying the M30/M20 has a better soundtrack!
This factor alone is enough to keep a smile on my face and makes up for the extra (if any) fuel costs and the M30 isn't exactly slow and will keep up with most modern cars (within reason) on the roads today.
'85 Hartge H28


-
325isporttech1
- E30 Zone Camper

- Posts: 1196
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Telford, Shropshire
- Contact:
Theres no replacement for displacement..an old saying but true
My e34 535 touring absolutely flies now ive sorted out the intake and got rid of the induction kit and replaced with a viper..couldnt imagine a m50-52 pulling the weight of it as well as the m30 does tbh but guess thats a different story away from e30's all together
My e34 535 touring absolutely flies now ive sorted out the intake and got rid of the induction kit and replaced with a viper..couldnt imagine a m50-52 pulling the weight of it as well as the m30 does tbh but guess thats a different story away from e30's all together
-
DanThe
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 28641
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Staffs
- Contact:
The thread was going fine until shite started to get postedbmwsport wrote: The whole M50 vs M30 thing is getting really old and repetitive. I'm sure the original poster was asking if he should keep his EXISTING M20 or replace it with an M50 but somehow the thread turns into another M50/M30 slagging match... My comment was to just take the peepee as these threads are becoming very tiresome and unneccessary.
More than one 325i driver commented on how good the exhaust note of my car sounded last year at the North Wales meet, IMO this invalidates your statementbmwsport wrote: there is no denying the M30/M20 has a better soundtrack!
-
325isporttech1
- E30 Zone Camper

- Posts: 1196
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Telford, Shropshire
- Contact:
Must be said the 'banter' has been quite mild on this one compared to some threads ive seen, Just the usual 'm30 boat anchor' jibes and 'm50 hating' etc etc quite amusing as usualThe thread was going fine until shite started to get posted
And Danthe if you have a m52b28 they do sound much much better than the m20. i must admit ive never liked the noise on either of my m20's.
-
325isporttech1
- E30 Zone Camper

- Posts: 1196
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Telford, Shropshire
- Contact:
Because noise isnt everything, was a very strange noise up the revs maybe because both had scorpion dtm's?sweep wrote:If you dont like the sound of either of your m20 engined cars why buy the cars then?
I like the raw feeling of the m20 and the power delivery and that is all
-
DanThe
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 28641
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Staffs
- Contact:
You have to be careful with what exhaust you use on an M20, its easy to get it wrong and end up with a booming note
My 24v engines have all been used with a full 325i scorpion system and sound great, a little loud possibly but a great sound
My 24v engines have all been used with a full 325i scorpion system and sound great, a little loud possibly but a great sound


