E30 2.7 trouble

Discuss general engine, turbo and supercharger conversions in this section

Moderator: martauto

User avatar
mddave
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:00 pm

Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:03 pm

hi all, i have a 2.7 eta running with a 2.5 head. been great for a year but the head gasket has gone! :(( now before ripping it apart, i have a 2.0 head kickin about. i have read the sticky but still like confomation. will my E30 have as much power as it did if i put the 2.0 head on??
oakey
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 4891
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Surrey

Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:31 pm

From my limited knowledge there is very little in it power wise.
Daimlerman has a 2.7 with an eta bottom end and a 320i head and it makes about 175bhp? and 180+ftlb?
Cliffybabe is using a 325i head and his car puts out pretty much the same power.
The 325i head has larger ports and valves and I would assume a different cam whereas the 320i head has better matching combustion chambers to for the eta pistons.
I would imagine you'd get better low down torque with the 320i head and better midrange/topend power with the 325i head

I stand to be corrected though :D
Image
StuBeeDoo
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6756
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Up My Own Arse

Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:33 pm

oakey wrote:From my limited knowledge there is very little in it power wise.
Daimlerman has a 2.7 with an eta bottom end and a 320i head and it makes about 175bhp? and 180+ftlb?
Cliffybabe is using a 325i head and his car puts out pretty much the same power.
The 325i head has larger ports and valves and I would assume a different cam whereas the 320i head has better matching combustion chambers to for the eta pistons.
I would imagine you'd get better low down torque with the 320i head and better midrange/topend power with the 325i head

I stand to be corrected though :D
I'd say that answer is pretty much on the money. :D :thumb:
This is why I no longer drive an E30......

Image
daimlerman
**BANNED**
Posts: 15968
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Grumpy Old Man

Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:45 pm

Yes,the above is pretty much the correct thinking.The 320(731 casting) will match your pistons,the 325(885 casting) does not,but the larger valves compansate.As you have to pull the thing apart anyway,why not have the valve seats cut back and stick in the 325 valves? gives you the best of both worlds.Cam choice will dictate the power band and position,standard 325 cam will give exellent lowdown grunt,tailing off above 5000rpm,aftermarket cams will just destroy the low down power(below,say,2000rpm) but will give fantastic top end,still be going when the rev limiter cuts in.Best of the standard cams is the difficult to find 323i version.
Youth is wasted on the young.
Simon13
The longest resto in the world !
Posts: 22697
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Camberley, Surrey don't u know

Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:52 pm

323 cam is around 270/270? which is bang into the aftermarket cams
StuBeeDoo
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6756
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Up My Own Arse

Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:22 pm

daimlerman wrote:Best of the standard cams is the difficult to find 323i version.
Simon13 wrote:323 cam is around 270/270
I see people keep banging on about the 323i cam being the best, but all the information I've ever seen says that all L-jet cams are 253/253 and Motronic ones (except the eta, of course) are 260/260.
This is why I no longer drive an E30......

Image
cliffybabe
Powered by Nelly
Powered by Nelly
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Croydon

Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:36 pm

spot on Oakey :thumb:
Image
Considering Selling the Cabby, looks like its gonna go
User avatar
chu346
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 2403
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Leicester

Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:24 am

I had a standard eta bottom end, a 320 head with 325i valves, a 272 cam and no other mods, I got 193bhp with an off the shelf chip.
daimlerman
**BANNED**
Posts: 15968
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Grumpy Old Man

Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:20 pm

chu346 wrote:I had a standard eta bottom end, a 320 head with 325i valves, a 272 cam and no other mods, I got 193bhp with an off the shelf chip.
That's about on the money,I have 178bhp with a stock 731 head with a 325 cam.How do you find drivability between idle and,say,3000rpm with the 272 cam,please?
User avatar
chu346
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 2403
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Leicester

Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:58 pm

Could be better between idle and 3000rpms but not bad though, it needed tuning, I could smell it overfueling sometimes at stand still, and the exhaust pipes were black. I say the most important thing when building an engine like is getting it tuned properly because very few 2.7 are the same spec and a generic chip won't do.
User avatar
mddave
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:00 pm

Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:38 pm

hi, thanks for all ur reply's, think ill throw the 2.0 head on with the 2.5 cam. and if im lucky gather the cash to get the valve seats ground bk to use the 2.5 valves. ive been dyin to turbo it, so ill probly pick ur brains soon :)
User avatar
chu346
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 2403
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Leicester

Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:21 pm

The 320 head will give a high c/r so it might be worth making it turbo spec now instead of throwing away money. So possibly 325 head to give slightly lower c/r or 320 head with decomplate or piston swap while the head is off, i think it can be done with the block in situe.
bss325i
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 24536
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: London/Surrey

Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:44 pm

Holy shit! All these 2.7's and such small gains! 8O
http://www.bmrperformance.co.uk

BMW and MINI specialist - Gatwick
User avatar
chu346
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 2403
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Leicester

Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:23 pm

bss325i wrote:Holy shit! All these 2.7's and such small gains! 8O
These are budget builds though! basicly built like a 325 engine with 0.2litre extra capacity. Yes I had a 272 cam but if i also had a 6 branch and a good remap I would have had some v.good figures.
daimlerman
**BANNED**
Posts: 15968
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Grumpy Old Man

Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:27 pm

bss325i wrote:Holy shit! All these 2.7's and such small gains! 8O
Hey,the 2.7 is about torque,not bhp,it's torque that fires you out of a bend,or up a mountain,in a higher gear than a 325... using less fuel..
bss325i
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 24536
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: London/Surrey

Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:32 pm

oakey wrote:Daimlerman has a 2.7 with an eta bottom end and a 320i head and it makes about 175bhp? and 180+ftlb? Cliffybabe is using a 325i head and his car puts out pretty much the same power.
180lbft?! :?
http://www.bmrperformance.co.uk

BMW and MINI specialist - Gatwick
User avatar
reggid
E30 Zone Squatter
E30 Zone Squatter
Posts: 1981
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Oz

Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:51 am

bss325i wrote:
oakey wrote:Daimlerman has a 2.7 with an eta bottom end and a 320i head and it makes about 175bhp? and 180+ftlb? Cliffybabe is using a 325i head and his car puts out pretty much the same power.
180lbft?! :?
thats at 2000rpm though, and peaks at just over 190lb-ft not too shabby for lugging around.

2.7/2.5 = 1.08 so a 2.7L in theory "only" provides an increase of 8% and in practice less at the topend if nothing is done to help breathing.

To the OP there is one way to find out and thats to try it......the 885 head outflows the 731 one but has bigger ports so in theory you might gain some low-mid and lose some top by using the 731 head but unless you have a baseline dyno you aren't really going to know for sure. Remember the biggest bottom end that the factory fit 731 head to was only 2.3L.

As for the 323i cam being bigger it may just be a myth until someone properly measures the two side by side. If i had one i would send it off to get done.
E30 325is with M20B31
User avatar
Gunni
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 2115
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Oxford

Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:37 pm

the squish given by the 731 head on a ETA makes alot of difference.
I´d run it on a ETA engine with a 320i, 323i or 325i cam.
It´s all going to be better then a 320i, ETA and will give favorable drivability over a 325i.
With great challenges comes great engineering.

Gunni
@ 2012 VEMS group buy !!
StuBeeDoo
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6756
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Up My Own Arse

Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:13 pm

IIRC, when I bought my eta/731 2.7 from Iain, he said that it made over 180bhp/185lb.ft with the standard 731 head. It's now running 325i valves and the inlet ports have been increased to 325i size. TBH I'm not that bothered what it's making - what ever it is it's good enough for me.
At the end of the day it all depends on the accuracy of the dyno you run it on. Power and torque figures are just bragging rights down the pub, aren't they? :roll: It's the way the car drives that counts......
Gunni wrote:It´s all going to be better then a 320i, and will give favorable drivability over a 325i.
This is why I no longer drive an E30......

Image
User avatar
Gunni
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 2115
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Oxford

Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:07 am

http://wp1016621.wp027.webpack.hosteuro ... f00080.htm

Use babelfish to translate it.
It´s a documentation of 2.7 setups using various means.

If it´s got 2,5 valves now I think it should be alot stronger then a 2.5, but the strangled exhaust port will always keep the powerband down unless if it was a Alpina head.
With great challenges comes great engineering.

Gunni
@ 2012 VEMS group buy !!
cliffybabe
Powered by Nelly
Powered by Nelly
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Croydon

Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:08 pm

bss325i wrote:
oakey wrote:Daimlerman has a 2.7 with an eta bottom end and a 320i head and it makes about 175bhp? and 180+ftlb? Cliffybabe is using a 325i head and his car puts out pretty much the same power.
180lbft?! :?
mine made 194lbft

looking to go onto uniq soon though
Image
Considering Selling the Cabby, looks like its gonna go
e30bmlover
Ac Schnitzer prophet
Ac Schnitzer prophet
Posts: 5352
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Playing on the ring road!!!

Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:51 pm

bss325i wrote:Holy shit! All these 2.7's and such small gains! 8O
thats what i was thinking barry...
cliffybabe
Powered by Nelly
Powered by Nelly
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Croydon

Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:41 pm

e30bmlover wrote:
bss325i wrote:Holy shit! All these 2.7's and such small gains! 8O
thats what i was thinking barry...
as already stated these are the cheaper 2.7 builds however im very pleased with my torq and responce of the car, The only reason i went 2.7 is due to blowing my bottom end
Image
Considering Selling the Cabby, looks like its gonna go
StuBeeDoo
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6756
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Up My Own Arse

Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:54 pm

e30bmlover wrote:
bss325i wrote:Holy shit! All these 2.7's and such small gains! 8O
thats what i was thinking barry...
Fair point considering they don't make much more than a good 2.5.
But how many 2.5's do you know that pull hard from less than 2k rpm? The useable torque is what an eta 2.7 is all about.
This is why I no longer drive an E30......

Image
User avatar
chu346
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 2403
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Leicester

Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:01 pm

cliffybabe wrote:
e30bmlover wrote:
bss325i wrote:Holy shit! All these 2.7's and such small gains! 8O
thats what i was thinking barry...
as already stated these are the cheaper 2.7 builds however im very pleased with my torq and responce of the car, The only reason i went 2.7 is due to blowing my bottom end
The reason I did it was because the 325 lump was knackered and the car was a motorsport convertible so wanted to keep it M20.

I think that unless you get the parts really cheap you would be better off doing an M50 conversion.
bss325i
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 24536
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: London/Surrey

Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:45 pm

chu346 wrote:
cliffybabe wrote:
e30bmlover wrote: thats what i was thinking barry...
as already stated these are the cheaper 2.7 builds however im very pleased with my torq and responce of the car, The only reason i went 2.7 is due to blowing my bottom end
The reason I did it was because the 325 lump was knackered and the car was a motorsport convertible so wanted to keep it M20.

I think that unless you get the parts really cheap you would be better off doing an M50 conversion.
True. I think on Sports and Motorsports an M20 should remain though.
http://www.bmrperformance.co.uk

BMW and MINI specialist - Gatwick
bss325i
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 24536
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: London/Surrey

Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:55 pm

As you can see from the graph with before and after the BTB2 was fitted to my completely stock 325i, it now makes a shade under 170lbft @ 2500 rpm and a peak of 194lbft @ 4000 rpm.

Not bad for a B25 eh?

Image
http://www.bmrperformance.co.uk

BMW and MINI specialist - Gatwick
User avatar
geoffrey
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:00 pm

Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:58 pm

My 2.7 was built with a 731 head with a 288 schrick cam, 6 branch, bbtb and a custom map by AMD.

It made 204.3 horsepower(164 at whp) at 5729Rpm and 219.6lb ft at 3968Rpm. This was just after the previous owner had it built by BMW.

I would personally like to see how these figures would compare to a 2.5 with the same goodies.
bss325i
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 24536
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: London/Surrey

Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:05 pm

288/288 or 288/272?
http://www.bmrperformance.co.uk

BMW and MINI specialist - Gatwick
cliffybabe
Powered by Nelly
Powered by Nelly
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Croydon

Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:20 pm

i cant wait to get my cam sorted :twisted:
Image
Considering Selling the Cabby, looks like its gonna go
User avatar
geoffrey
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:00 pm

Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:09 pm

bss325i wrote:288/288 or 288/272?
288/272
daimlerman
**BANNED**
Posts: 15968
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Grumpy Old Man

Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:14 pm

geoffrey wrote:My 2.7 was built with a 731 head with a 288 schrick cam, 6 branch, bbtb and a custom map by AMD.

It made 204.3 horsepower(164 at whp) at 5729Rpm and 219.6lb ft at 3968Rpm. This was just after the previous owner had it built by BMW.

I would personally like to see how these figures would compare to a 2.5 with the same goodies.
Good results,any idea of the cost of building? Any usable power below 2000rpm?
bss325i
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 24536
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: London/Surrey

Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:03 pm

geoffrey wrote:
bss325i wrote:288/288 or 288/272?
288/272
Cool. Is the AMD remap a proprer remap of the Motronic or just a chip for the Motronic?
http://www.bmrperformance.co.uk

BMW and MINI specialist - Gatwick
oakey
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 4891
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Surrey

Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:16 pm

daimlerman wrote:
geoffrey wrote:My 2.7 was built with a 731 head with a 288 schrick cam, 6 branch, bbtb and a custom map by AMD.

It made 204.3 horsepower(164 at whp) at 5729Rpm and 219.6lb ft at 3968Rpm. This was just after the previous owner had it built by BMW.

I would personally like to see how these figures would compare to a 2.5 with the same goodies.
Good results,any idea of the cost of building? Any usable power below 2000rpm?
Do you really need power below 2000rpm?
Image
User avatar
geoffrey
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:00 pm

Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:01 pm

bss325i wrote: Cool. Is the AMD remap a proprer remap of the Motronic or just a chip for the Motronic?
Was a propper mapping session on the rollers I believe. Like I said all the work was done by the previous owner. It's scary looking through the receipts folder...

It would appear a lot of money has to be spent to get decent gains. Just glad I wasn't the one doing all the spending!
Post Reply