CR on a 2.8 build??
Moderator: martauto
-
BadDave
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 6012
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Nr Aberdeen.Scotland(Gods country)
Hi guys
Just a quick question
I'm taking delivery of an M52B28 bottom end in the next few days and planning on using it in a spare M20B25 block
I'm planning on using M20B20 rods with M20B25 pistons(from a facelifted motor)
What sort of CR should i be getting with this setup ?.
Bearing in mind,that i'm looking to add a turbo at some point and don't want to have to rebuild it again prior to fitting above mentioned turbo.
Will a decomp plate be required??
Cheers in advance
Dave
Just a quick question
I'm taking delivery of an M52B28 bottom end in the next few days and planning on using it in a spare M20B25 block
I'm planning on using M20B20 rods with M20B25 pistons(from a facelifted motor)
What sort of CR should i be getting with this setup ?.
Bearing in mind,that i'm looking to add a turbo at some point and don't want to have to rebuild it again prior to fitting above mentioned turbo.
Will a decomp plate be required??
Cheers in advance
Dave
Alpina B10 3.2L #187 (1 of 64 brought into the UK)
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
-
march109
- Engaged to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 6632
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: Bournemouth
Don't think anyone has bothered to work it out.
IIRC late 2.5 head combustion chambers are 53.25cc
the 2.8L crank is 84mm 2.5L crank is 75mm = 9mm difference
320i rods are 130mm 325i rods are 135mm = 5mm difference
meaning the piston will pertrude into the combustion chamber by an extra 4mm, bore is 84mm so
(Pi(42)^2)*4mm = 2.2cc (I think!)
= combustion chamber V of 51.05cc
= CR 10.1:1 IMO decomp plate needed
Even if you can maintain the 53.25cc combustion chamber the 325i head normally has you would still have a CR of 8.8:1 (with late 2.5L pistons)again IMO too much for high boost and decomp plate needed.
I seem to find every 1mm you add to the combustion chamber height you gain about + 0.5:0 to CR so to get a CR of around 8.0:1 you need to add 4mm-5mm which just seems to me to be too much to be safe,you could enf up blowing decomp plates all day long.
Custom pistons are the way forward,
But quite frankly your better off actually testing it properly since my maths is normally crap after this much beer.
And all IMO and the bestI can do before and after pub.
IIRC late 2.5 head combustion chambers are 53.25cc
the 2.8L crank is 84mm 2.5L crank is 75mm = 9mm difference
320i rods are 130mm 325i rods are 135mm = 5mm difference
meaning the piston will pertrude into the combustion chamber by an extra 4mm, bore is 84mm so
(Pi(42)^2)*4mm = 2.2cc (I think!)
= combustion chamber V of 51.05cc
= CR 10.1:1 IMO decomp plate needed
Even if you can maintain the 53.25cc combustion chamber the 325i head normally has you would still have a CR of 8.8:1 (with late 2.5L pistons)again IMO too much for high boost and decomp plate needed.
I seem to find every 1mm you add to the combustion chamber height you gain about + 0.5:0 to CR so to get a CR of around 8.0:1 you need to add 4mm-5mm which just seems to me to be too much to be safe,you could enf up blowing decomp plates all day long.
Custom pistons are the way forward,
But quite frankly your better off actually testing it properly since my maths is normally crap after this much beer.
And all IMO and the bestI can do before and after pub.
325i Tech 1 Touring, breaking.
2.5 high comp. M20, 3.64 LSD, Fully undersealed, Spax springs & Bilstein shocks, s/s exhaust, Alpina rep wheels and more.
2.5 high comp. M20, 3.64 LSD, Fully undersealed, Spax springs & Bilstein shocks, s/s exhaust, Alpina rep wheels and more.
-
Turbo-Brown
- Boost Junkie
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hants
Don't forget that while the stroke is 9mm greater than the M20B25 crank, that means you add 4.5mm to the TDC and subtract 4.5mm from the BDC so with 5mm shorter rods the piston would be 0.5mm further down the bore than standard.
Forget what the standard facelift CR is, thing it's 8.7:1 isn't it?
So to work out what the clearance volume (chamber and anything else that's left over):
CR=(disp+clear)/clear
CR-clear=disp/clear
clear(CR-1)=disp
clear=disp/(CR-1)
So we've got a CR of 8.7:1
A displacement of 2494/6=415.7cc per cyl
so putting our numbers back into the equation gives:
clear=415.7/(8.7-1)
=415.7/7.7
clear=53.90cc
So if the bore is 8.4cm and we move the TDC piston down by 0.5mm, we get an extra:
4.2^2*3.14=55.42cm^2
55.42*0.05=2.771cc
So going back to the original equation:
CR=(disp+clear)/clear
=(415.7+(53.9+2.771))/(53.9+2.771)
=(415.7+56.671)/56.671
=472.371/56.671
CR=8.34
There ya go
Forget what the standard facelift CR is, thing it's 8.7:1 isn't it?
So to work out what the clearance volume (chamber and anything else that's left over):
CR=(disp+clear)/clear
CR-clear=disp/clear
clear(CR-1)=disp
clear=disp/(CR-1)
So we've got a CR of 8.7:1
A displacement of 2494/6=415.7cc per cyl
so putting our numbers back into the equation gives:
clear=415.7/(8.7-1)
=415.7/7.7
clear=53.90cc
So if the bore is 8.4cm and we move the TDC piston down by 0.5mm, we get an extra:
4.2^2*3.14=55.42cm^2
55.42*0.05=2.771cc
So going back to the original equation:
CR=(disp+clear)/clear
=(415.7+(53.9+2.771))/(53.9+2.771)
=(415.7+56.671)/56.671
=472.371/56.671
CR=8.34
There ya go
Last edited by Turbo-Brown on Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
BadDave
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 6012
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Nr Aberdeen.Scotland(Gods country)
Thanks for the input so far guys
So that should drop the CR down to 9. something??Turbo-Brown wrote:Don't forget that while the stroke is 9mm greater than the M20B25 crank, that means you add 4.5mm to the TDC and subtract 4.5mm from the BDC so with 5mm shorter rods the piston would be 0.5mm further down the bore than standard.
Alpina B10 3.2L #187 (1 of 64 brought into the UK)
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
-
Turbo-Brown
- Boost Junkie
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hants
Sorry dude went back and edited with equations 
-
BadDave
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 6012
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Nr Aberdeen.Scotland(Gods country)
Thanks Alex
That figure looks better to me than 10.1:1
So that means it'll be safe enough to add the T4 without any additional strip down/decomp plate
Much appreciated
That figure looks better to me than 10.1:1
So that means it'll be safe enough to add the T4 without any additional strip down/decomp plate
Much appreciated
Alpina B10 3.2L #187 (1 of 64 brought into the UK)
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
-
Turbo-Brown
- Boost Junkie
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hants
It'll almost certainly be fine like that.
Guess the thing to do would be start off on low boost and work up progressively, listening for pinging all the way.
Guess the thing to do would be start off on low boost and work up progressively, listening for pinging all the way.
-
BadDave
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 6012
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Nr Aberdeen.Scotland(Gods country)
Turbo-Brown wrote:It'll almost certainly be fine like that.
Guess the thing to do would be start off on low boost and work up progressively, listening for pinging all the way.
I'll run it N/A till i've got everything sorted out in a dummy build then swap it over.
Would i be best to run the DTA on TPS or Map ??
Or just use one of Ant's chips till the turbo's fitted?
Alpina B10 3.2L #187 (1 of 64 brought into the UK)
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
-
Turbo-Brown
- Boost Junkie
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hants
If you've got a DTA then you might as well use it from the off.
If it's like the Emerald, it'll be really geared up to use the TPS with MAP corrections for boost but if it's like MS, it'll be fine with just MAP.
In many ways, it makes more sense to map a boosted engine using just MAP (unless you have ITBs or something like that) so it's probably worth rigging it up to use MAP as main load sensing and TPS just for accel enrichment.
If it's like the Emerald, it'll be really geared up to use the TPS with MAP corrections for boost but if it's like MS, it'll be fine with just MAP.
In many ways, it makes more sense to map a boosted engine using just MAP (unless you have ITBs or something like that) so it's probably worth rigging it up to use MAP as main load sensing and TPS just for accel enrichment.
-
BadDave
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 6012
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Nr Aberdeen.Scotland(Gods country)
I'll dig out the old instuction manual than came with it and see what it's saying
I'll have a look at an old TB i've got and see about the connection for a compatible TPS then
Thanks for all your input Alex
I'll have a look at an old TB i've got and see about the connection for a compatible TPS then
Thanks for all your input Alex
Alpina B10 3.2L #187 (1 of 64 brought into the UK)
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
-
Turbo-Brown
- Boost Junkie
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hants
Just double check that I'm not completely wrong starting off with a CR of 8.7:1 too! 
-
BadDave
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 6012
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Nr Aberdeen.Scotland(Gods country)
Turbo-Brown wrote:Just double check that I'm not completely wrong starting off with a CR of 8.7:1 too!
Just double checked and it appears you were close to the mark there
Seems as if the cr is 8.8:1 unless i'm looking at the wrong figure
Alpina B10 3.2L #187 (1 of 64 brought into the UK)
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
-
march109
- Engaged to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 6632
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: Bournemouth
Seems fine to me, I forgot about TDC and BDC and just plugged the new combustion chamber figure into the normal 325i equation.
325i Tech 1 Touring, breaking.
2.5 high comp. M20, 3.64 LSD, Fully undersealed, Spax springs & Bilstein shocks, s/s exhaust, Alpina rep wheels and more.
2.5 high comp. M20, 3.64 LSD, Fully undersealed, Spax springs & Bilstein shocks, s/s exhaust, Alpina rep wheels and more.
-
march109
- Engaged to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 6632
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: Bournemouth
Stock late M20 is 8.8:1 but thst is down to pistons so as long as you use late pistons the calcs are reasonably accurate.
325i Tech 1 Touring, breaking.
2.5 high comp. M20, 3.64 LSD, Fully undersealed, Spax springs & Bilstein shocks, s/s exhaust, Alpina rep wheels and more.
2.5 high comp. M20, 3.64 LSD, Fully undersealed, Spax springs & Bilstein shocks, s/s exhaust, Alpina rep wheels and more.
-
BadDave
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 6012
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Nr Aberdeen.Scotland(Gods country)
So it'll roughly end up as 8.4:1 or there abouts
That's fine
Not looking for a tempremental high comp motor at the moment
That's fine
Not looking for a tempremental high comp motor at the moment
Alpina B10 3.2L #187 (1 of 64 brought into the UK)
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
-
reggid
- E30 Zone Squatter

- Posts: 1982
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Oz
Standard B25 chamber size is CL = V/(CR-1) = 415.6/(8.8-1) = 53.3cc
B28 Vol = pi/4*8.4^2*8.4 = 465.5cc
Delta piston position = (84-75)/2 - (135-130) = -0.5mm.
B28 CL = 53.3cc + pi/4*8.4^2*0.05 = 56.1cc
CR = CL/(CL+V) = 56.1/(56.1+465.5) = 9.3:1
Turbo-Brown you used the B25 volume not the B28 one
it will vary depending on whether the head or block have been skimmed and whether you use a 1.75 or 2.05mm gasket.
B28 Vol = pi/4*8.4^2*8.4 = 465.5cc
Delta piston position = (84-75)/2 - (135-130) = -0.5mm.
B28 CL = 53.3cc + pi/4*8.4^2*0.05 = 56.1cc
CR = CL/(CL+V) = 56.1/(56.1+465.5) = 9.3:1
Turbo-Brown you used the B25 volume not the B28 one
it will vary depending on whether the head or block have been skimmed and whether you use a 1.75 or 2.05mm gasket.
-
march109
- Engaged to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 6632
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: Bournemouth
How is B28 CL more than B25 CL??reggid wrote:Standard B25 chamber size is CL = V/(CR-1) = 415.6/(8.8-1) = 53.3cc
B28 Vol = pi/4*8.4^2*8.4 = 465.5cc
Delta piston position = (84-75)/2 - (135-130) = -0.5mm.
B28 CL = 53.3cc + pi/4*8.4^2*0.05 = 56.1cc
CR = CL/(CL+V) = 56.1/(56.1+465.5) = 9.3:1
Turbo-Brown you used the B25 volume not the B28 one
it will vary depending on whether the head or block have been skimmed and whether you use a 1.75 or 2.05mm gasket.
325i Tech 1 Touring, breaking.
2.5 high comp. M20, 3.64 LSD, Fully undersealed, Spax springs & Bilstein shocks, s/s exhaust, Alpina rep wheels and more.
2.5 high comp. M20, 3.64 LSD, Fully undersealed, Spax springs & Bilstein shocks, s/s exhaust, Alpina rep wheels and more.
-
Turbo-Brown
- Boost Junkie
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hants
Ooh bugger! That's a very good point there Reggid! 
Our M20B28 CL is more than the M20B25s because the piston will be 0.5mm down the bore at TDC when compared to the B25.
Whadda mistaka to maka!
Sorry Dave!
Our M20B28 CL is more than the M20B25s because the piston will be 0.5mm down the bore at TDC when compared to the B25.
Whadda mistaka to maka!
Sorry Dave!
-
march109
- Engaged to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 6632
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: Bournemouth
ok cool, didn't make sence when I first read the proof. I thought the combustion chamber V was smaller.
Proabably why idiots should'nt be allowed the power of math.
Proabably why idiots should'nt be allowed the power of math.
325i Tech 1 Touring, breaking.
2.5 high comp. M20, 3.64 LSD, Fully undersealed, Spax springs & Bilstein shocks, s/s exhaust, Alpina rep wheels and more.
2.5 high comp. M20, 3.64 LSD, Fully undersealed, Spax springs & Bilstein shocks, s/s exhaust, Alpina rep wheels and more.
-
BadDave
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 6012
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Nr Aberdeen.Scotland(Gods country)
So it's 9.3:1
It's ok Alex
Just means i'll have to use a thin decomp plate or a thicker head gasket it gets the turbo
It's ok Alex
Just means i'll have to use a thin decomp plate or a thicker head gasket it gets the turbo
Alpina B10 3.2L #187 (1 of 64 brought into the UK)
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
2.8L turbo build thread(work in progress)
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 27#1268227
