I think the disagreement here is because you are taking the 325 head route which involves machinig and dismantling the bottom end. I am using 320 head, which is just a straight bottom end swap.
Granted 325 head will prob give better resutls, but I have the a shoe string budget.
How do you break in an engine
Moderator: martauto
-
tbmw
- E30 Zone Regular

- Posts: 681
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: weston super mare
from what i've read you need to change the cam to make it a worthwhile exercise, standard cam and it is a waste of time
-
Guest
I quote from TBMW 2.7 conversion article.E30Adam wrote:An ETA bottom end with a 320 head plonked on the top is not a proper 2.7 conversion and you won't even make as much power as a stock 2.5 lump so it's a pointless exercise.
"885 (325) head has bigger ports and bigger valves, 42mm inlet and 36mm exhaust. However, the exhaust ports are similar size to the 731 (320) head and the inlet ports are a different shape as opposed to being radically bigger. The 731 (320) head is far from shabby and can flow enough air for 200bhp"
I thank you.
-
Guest
Yeah I would have cam'd it anyway, 325 or 320 head. I'll give you that one.tbmw wrote:from what i've read you need to change the cam to make it a worthwhile exercise, standard cam and it is a waste of time
-
Ant
- Retired Team Member

- Posts: 10496
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 11:00 pm
- Location: PD+E dept :D
Ok , I'm gonna post on this one then 
Edd is doing the budget build, his engine shouldnet him around 190 bhp and comparable torque, he freely admits to being on a budget and is not expecting a 210 bhp monster, what he want is a nice upgrade from the 130 odd bhp of his 2.0 mill, lets not flame him for that folks
the stock cam is not ideal for power, this we know but alpina cams were not much hotter TBH and @ least with a stock camshaft ther are no poor idle symptoms or peaks in the delivery.
Both methods are fine, as has been discussed at length before.
the 2.7 to avoid is the ETA bottom end , 325 head combo, 100% guaranted to pink, the chambers are the wrong shape for a good burn with flat topped pistons.
I feel another dyno day brewing once these are completed and run in .
be interesting to compare results VS build cost.
Ԛ£Ã”šÃ‚£Ãƒ”šÃ‚£ per bhp gained.. the 320/ETA hybrid should take the win by miles
Edd is doing the budget build, his engine shouldnet him around 190 bhp and comparable torque, he freely admits to being on a budget and is not expecting a 210 bhp monster, what he want is a nice upgrade from the 130 odd bhp of his 2.0 mill, lets not flame him for that folks
the stock cam is not ideal for power, this we know but alpina cams were not much hotter TBH and @ least with a stock camshaft ther are no poor idle symptoms or peaks in the delivery.
Both methods are fine, as has been discussed at length before.
the 2.7 to avoid is the ETA bottom end , 325 head combo, 100% guaranted to pink, the chambers are the wrong shape for a good burn with flat topped pistons.
I feel another dyno day brewing once these are completed and run in .
be interesting to compare results VS build cost.
Ԛ£Ã”šÃ‚£Ãƒ”šÃ‚£ per bhp gained.. the 320/ETA hybrid should take the win by miles
Last edited by Ant on Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Quaser
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: West London
So Jimbob - which 2.7 route are you taking?
i know off the following:
1. eta block, 320i head with 325 cam and anxillaries
2. eta crank/rods, 325i head, block and pistons - all machined to fit!
3. etc block - 325i head - slightly skimmed!
I think mine was a varient of number 2!
Q
i know off the following:
1. eta block, 320i head with 325 cam and anxillaries
2. eta crank/rods, 325i head, block and pistons - all machined to fit!
3. etc block - 325i head - slightly skimmed!
I think mine was a varient of number 2!
Q
-
Guest
Just give me till the Summer and I'd be happy to be the 320 head 2.7 guinea pig on the rollers Ant 
-
Jimbob
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 3731
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Poole
Mine is #2 on your list
Will get it on the rollers as soon as I've ran it in, then mod accordingly to whatever money I can scrape together
Will get it on the rollers as soon as I've ran it in, then mod accordingly to whatever money I can scrape together
-
Guest
For the record, like Ant put it, I admit #2 on the list is the "proper" way of doing the conversion, if you are liking it to the C2 Alpina.
I however have just recently dipped my toe in the world of BMW (been a Vauxhall man otherwise), and am after a straightforward cheap fast rear wheel drive car to hopefully not dissapoint from my Astra GTE 16v.
I however have just recently dipped my toe in the world of BMW (been a Vauxhall man otherwise), and am after a straightforward cheap fast rear wheel drive car to hopefully not dissapoint from my Astra GTE 16v.
-
Quaser
- E30 Zone Addict

- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: West London
Any chance i could have a look at the spreadsheet you put together with Adam?
bmw@raj4.com
Maybe i can save u some Ԛ£Ã”šÃ‚£Ãƒ”šÃ‚£ (more then likley tell u to spend more though
)
Q
bmw@raj4.com
Maybe i can save u some Ԛ£Ã”šÃ‚£Ãƒ”šÃ‚£ (more then likley tell u to spend more though
Q
-
E30Adam
- Married to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 8483
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:00 pm
- Location: Bournemouth
Don't worry we've whittled it down to be as cheap as possible.
Not much more to be had on savings unless you can get free parts
Not much more to be had on savings unless you can get free parts

2.8 Litre M20 powered - Essen Sie meinen Staub biatch
-
Guest
This is what Ant was implying; the Alpina camshaft is not much hotter than a standard, therefore smooth idle and not a peaky delivery.
Last edited by Guest on Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Jhonno
- Homo Hair
- Posts: 20362
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: FLAT, FLAT, FLAT!!
[Hijack]
Love your M5 Sal!!
Whats it like to drive?
[/Hijack]
Love your M5 Sal!!
Whats it like to drive?
[/Hijack]
