Cone or Pannel Filter
Moderator: martauto
-
stevotheevo
- West Sussex Hooligan
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:00 pm
- Location: f@cked right off
- Brianmoooore
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 49358
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
There are no appreciable gains to be had by messing with the air filter on any E30 with a standard engine, and the OE filter actually filters the air.
-
StuBeeDoo
- Engaged to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 6756
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Up My Own Arse
My Touring had a K&N cone on when I bought it. IIRC, it only stayed on for about a week - it was crap from both power and induction roar points-of-view. It's had a standard panel ever since and that's the way it will stay, even when I get my project engine built.
- Brianmoooore
- E30 Zone Team Member

- Posts: 49358
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Personally, I can't see the attraction of induction noise at all! M20 exhaust at 4500RPM in a tunnel with the sunroof open is a different thing altogether!!garyn wrote:Ah but a nice induction roar is always better .
I remember aaages ago somone did some flow tests and found that the standard setup was the best for airflow and torque, cone filters if your running FI, otherwise stick with what BMW spent obseen amounts of money developing.
Quick comparison
Everyone has a dig at the M20B20 but in it's day 129bhp was good, the 2.0 golf of the time called itself a GTI with 112bhp
Quick comparison
Everyone has a dig at the M20B20 but in it's day 129bhp was good, the 2.0 golf of the time called itself a GTI with 112bhp
My testing showed around 2.5% gains across all rpm on a modded M20 using a K&N panel versus new paper OEM one and it still should transalte into an extra pony or two from stock on any M20.
IMO the only reason for not using the K&N panel is if you don't trust the filtering abilities and in that regard all that matters is if it filters the nasties not whether it wins a filteration test and i don't see them being bad in that department given they are still around after 40 odd years and still sell millions of them and have millions that swear by it. It might be like the myth that the oil destroys MAFS and paper outflows K&N.
IMO the only reason for not using the K&N panel is if you don't trust the filtering abilities and in that regard all that matters is if it filters the nasties not whether it wins a filteration test and i don't see them being bad in that department given they are still around after 40 odd years and still sell millions of them and have millions that swear by it. It might be like the myth that the oil destroys MAFS and paper outflows K&N.






