Turbo on 320? Is it worth it

Moderator: martauto

Post Reply
320
E30 Zone Regular
E30 Zone Regular
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:00 pm

Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:06 pm

Hi all, I brought my 320 a couple of months ago as my insurance wrote my previous 320 off due to a little bump, I had the other one for about 12 months but the engine started playing up, oil leeks , engine hunting ect... The engine I have in this car seems fine no problems with more miles than the other 1, it has 116000 ish miles, would it be worth putting a turbo on the m20 engine with this sort of mileage or put another newer engine in first to do turbo thing, any advice or opinions good or bad are welcome thanks
Grrrmachine
E30 Zone Wiki / Team Member
E30 Zone Wiki / Team Member
Posts: 8043
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:11 pm

Simple answer is no. For the time and money you'd have to put into it, and the relatively low boost you could run on an M20B20 without killing it, you could pay to put in an M52B28, or an M20B25 with lots of other mods.

Do it to be different, but don't do it for the power; there isn't any. However, it's not an impossible task, but the 320 isn't worth doing it to.
320
E30 Zone Regular
E30 Zone Regular
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:00 pm

Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:14 pm

What sort of power or boost could a 320 push?
jimmyspeed
E30 Zone Regular
E30 Zone Regular
Posts: 848
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: riding a wagon wheel west

Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:28 pm

search "m20b20 turbo" there a fair bit on it - I'm currently building a turbo manifold for mine there are advantages and disadvantages (not huge power at the end) but i think mine will be a good torquey street car

http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... 0b20+turbo
CHR1S1990
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1121
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Blackpool

Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:57 pm

what year is the car?
Image
320
E30 Zone Regular
E30 Zone Regular
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:00 pm

Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:02 pm

It's a 89 g reg
CHR1S1990
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1121
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Blackpool

Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:09 pm

so 8.8:1 compression ratio - bang on for a turbo I'd say! same as the late m20b25. If you can spare an extra £300 id get an m20b25 in there and turbo that, if anything just so the turbo comes "in" quicker. If not, just get some ARP bolts on the b20 and you could easily do 300-350bhp. You have a budget?
Image
320
E30 Zone Regular
E30 Zone Regular
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:00 pm

Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:04 am

I thought the m20b20 was 9.8.1, or is that the earlier model, is right that the lower the compression the better for the turbo mod? If so is it possible to lower the compression on it?
CHR1S1990
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1121
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Blackpool

Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:11 am

indeed, earlier (pre 86 IIRC) were 9.8:1. I wouldnt lower it much, if any, more than 8.8:1 as your off boost power and consumption would be crap. Depends on what you want the car for! Drag car, super low compression and mahoosive turbo. Road car Im guessing so there's always compromises. Stock compression, stock headgasket, ARP bolts and a nicely sized turbo would make a nice fun road go'er.
Image
320
E30 Zone Regular
E30 Zone Regular
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:00 pm

Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:37 am

I had a Subaru forester turbo and that had a compression 8.5.1 so the 8.8.1 isn't that far off and engine was good for 400 bhp.
Post Reply