crank differences

Moderator: martauto

JAFF
E30 Zone Regular
E30 Zone Regular
Posts: 451
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: malmesbury ,wiltshire

Post Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:28 pm

hi all me and kingcruizer are in the process of building two 2.8 strokers ,
we both have 2.8 cranks but they both have slight but noticable differences ! one has NC38 and the other has c38 on them ,whats the crank with that :D
Image
nickphine
E30 Zone Regular
E30 Zone Regular
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Kendal

Post Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:38 pm

Hi there, i've had this problem. I know that the nc38 crank i have sitting on my shelf is the 'wrong' one, but as the the right one is now in my engine i can't say with certainty that the it was the c38. As i recall the webs on the right one were the same size but the ones on the wrong one are different sizes, hope that makes sense.

Nick.
CHR1S1990
E30 Zone Camper
E30 Zone Camper
Posts: 1121
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Blackpool

Post Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:58 pm

as far as i know, theres no right or wrong one, just one is easier to use than the other. one fits in plug and play and the other has slightly larger crank webs which need a little metal removing from the block to clear
Image
HairyScreech
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6265
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:00 pm

Post Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:40 am

the larger web crank dose not need the block clearancing (see my 2.8 thread) but it will foul the bottom of the pistons on all of the common easy build methods.

the solution to this is to have the weights "bobbed" which reduces there diameter (and mass but its not a problem, complicated math but trust me) this allows the crank to clear, any good engine shop will be able to do this or point you in the right direction.

p.s. being in malmesbury i assume your not far from me in ba12 land then.
2.8 development thread http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... c&t=170822

m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&
JAFF
E30 Zone Regular
E30 Zone Regular
Posts: 451
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: malmesbury ,wiltshire

Post Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:55 pm

HairyScreech wrote:the larger web crank dose not need the block clearancing (see my 2.8 thread) but it will foul the bottom of the pistons on all of the common easy build methods.

the solution to this is to have the weights "bobbed" which reduces there diameter (and mass but its not a problem, complicated math but trust me) this allows the crank to clear, any good engine shop will be able to do this or point you in the right direction.

p.s. being in malmesbury i assume your not far from me in ba12 land then.
thats right mate im not far from you where are you then bath ?

id rather not go into the extra expense of machining the crank if i can get the C38 but if your offering .............................
Image
HairyScreech
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Engaged to the E30 Zone
Posts: 6265
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:00 pm

Post Thu Sep 22, 2011 8:33 pm

ahh mine is being built into a spare engine, and i would advise looking for a small weight crank.

the small weight cranks come from the single vanos early m52b28 engines.
2.8 development thread http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... c&t=170822

m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&