e30 2.8

Discuss general engine, turbo and supercharger conversions in this section

Moderator: martauto

bmwonly
Unapproved Trader caution
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:00 pm

Post Sat Dec 16, 2006 9:42 pm

im interested in this 2.8 conversion . so far i know its the e36 2.8 crank which needs a collar makin up to house, hold crank. then 320 pistons and rods. does this seem about right???
....
m-dtech
Unapproved Trader caution
Posts: 2068
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 11:00 pm

Post Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:46 pm

why not just drop in the e36 m52 2.8??
bmwonly
Unapproved Trader caution
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:00 pm

Post Thu Dec 28, 2006 1:52 am

coz i wanna keep it E30. and its different. and it'llbe a shit load cheaper
e30_Turbo
Boost Junkie
Posts: 3158
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: East Anglia

Post Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:18 am

bmwonly wrote:coz i wanna keep it E30. and its different. and it'llbe a shit load cheaper
Been done a few times on here actually, not as potent as you may think.

I'd go for the 2.8 engine as is, 24v, 240/250bhp poss too, you won't get that outta a m20 with spending £6/7k+

Or fit a turbo, but then again I am biased winkeye
Image
User avatar
Brianmoooore
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 49359
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm

Post Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:42 am

bmwonly wrote:im interested in this 2.8 conversion . so far i know its the e36 2.8 crank which needs a collar makin up to house, hold crank. then 320 pistons and rods. does this seem about right???
....
Andyboy (Andrew Everret) knows his stuff, and has been posting on this recently. Do a forum search.
oze30
E30 Zone Addict
E30 Zone Addict
Posts: 4133
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:12 pm

fozzymonster wrote:
bmwonly wrote:coz i wanna keep it E30. and its different. and it'llbe a shit load cheaper
Been done a few times on here actually, not as potent as you may think.

I'd go for the 2.8 engine as is, 24v, 240/250bhp poss too, you won't get that outta a m20 with spending £6/7k+

Or fit a turbo, but then again I am biased winkeye
Considering the costs involved with the m50.. manifold work, gearbox, diff, prop, you'd be better off with the (cost wise) 2.8i reckon.. or a 3.5! winkeye
Andyboy
Alpina Colada
Posts: 12578
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:00 pm

Post Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:49 pm

325i or Eta block. 2.8 crank with a collar made up. Standard M52 crank bolt shortened by 2mm. 320i/Eta rods and late (short skirt) 325i pistons. Then just screw it together, no other machining needed.

As for power, it will always give a bit more power and torque than a comparable 2.7. It's a nicer conversion because you don't need to skim the block or piss about with vernier cam pulleys. A new crank with shells from BMW is about £540+vat but a shagged short engine with bore wear or stripped threads a lot less.
Cranks are exchange so you'd give BMW your old 325i crank back winkeye . Most dealers will give 10% off this making a lovely new crank with shells £571. Not bad!