M42 with EatonM45 Supercharger

Discuss general engine, turbo and supercharger conversions in this section

Moderator: martauto

Post Reply
GeoffBob
Forced Induction Specialist
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:00 pm

Sat Aug 08, 2009 2:49 pm

In this thread, aside from defining some basic forced induction facts, I will endeavour to explain how to estimate the performance of an M42 engine with an Eaton M45 roots type supercharger. While the results presented here are specific to the M42 engine and Eaton M45 supercharger, the method may be employed to analyse the behaviour of any supercharged engine, provided you have the compressor map for your chosen supercharger and some basic facts about your engine.

The EatonM45 supercharger (typically salvaged from a MiniCooperS or available new from Eaton) is a popular addition to many smaller four piston engines, and the 1800cc BMW 16V M42 engine is no exception. In fact, due to the reasonably high volumetric efficiency of this 16V engine, the M42 is an ideal candidate for the M45 supercharger.

Before we consider how the BMW M42 engine will respond to the fitment of an Eaton M45 roots pump, you need to be aware of a few basic facts: The mechanical work output (power output, typically measured in units of horsepower or kilowatts) of any engine is a direct function of the mass of air inducted into the engine and, as one would expect, the mass of fuel combusted with the inducted air. Now, the mass of fuel that may be combusted (oxidised) successfully during the combustion process is entirely dependant upon the mass of air inducted into the combustion chamber. Thus, to increase the power output of an engine it is necessary, first and foremost, to increase the mass of air inducted into an engine, before contemplating increasing the mass of fuel to be combusted with the increased mass of air. One of the most popular techniques employed to increase the mass of air inducted into an engine is to afix an air pump of some description (such as a supercharger or turbocharger) to the engine. Another (less popular) technique is to induct Nitrous-Oxide (laughing gas) which, upon heating, liberates copious quantities of oxygen to the combustion reaction as the Nitrous-Oxide decomposes into Nitrogen and Oxygen.

Thus, to estimate the power output of a forced induction engine you first and foremost need to determine how much air the engine will forcibly induct as a function of engine speed. To aid us in this task manufacturers of turbochargers and superchargers supply flow maps for their compressors. Below is the flow map for the Eaton M45 supercharger, supplied by Eaton.

Image
Figure 1: Eaton M45 roots pump flow map.

However, before we can successfully use this rather formidable looking graph we need to understand what it tells us. Ignoring (for the moment) the blue circles, figure 1 shows us the ratio of the compressor outlet to inlet air pressure (on the Y-axis) as a function of the volume of air flowed through the compressor (X-axis) at a particular compressor speed (the pale green dotted lines).

For example, looking closely at figure 1, we see that if we were to rotate the compressor input shaft at a speed of 8000rpm (see the dotted pale green line marked ”a8000”a) such that we induct 300 cubic meters of air per hour through the compressor, the air pressure at the outlet of the M45 roots pump will be roughly 1.35 times greater than at the inlet. Thus, if you are fortunate enough to live at a sea level with a daily barometric air pressure of 1bar, you would expect to measure an absolute pressure of 1.35bar at the compressor outlet. However, since your typical boost gauge measures gauge (relative) pressure (not absolute pressure) you would read this as 0.35bar or 5.1psi of boost. That is to say, an outlet pressure 0.35bar greater than the inlet pressure.

Now, a few facts about roots pumps to help you better understand figure 1. Roots pumps, due to the way they work, pump a roughly constant volume of air for each rotation of the compressor input shaft. The Eaton M45 is stated by Eaton to pump 0.75 litres (that’s 0.00075 cubic meters) of air per each revolution of the input shaft. Thus, at a shaft speed of say 10000rpm we would expect the EatonM45 to pump

Image

regardless of the inlet to outlet pressure ratio.

A quick review of figure 1 indicates that this is not the case, and for very good reason. In fact, at a pressure ratio of 1 (with both the inlet and outlet open to atmospheric pressure) the Eaton M45 roots pump is only capable of pumping roughly 410 cubic meters of air per hour (40 cubic meters per hour less than our calculated value of 450 cubic meters per hour). Furthermore, as the pressure ratio is increased the flow rate is observed to drop. This is due to the fact that roots pumps are notorious for the fact that the blades of the compressor rotors do not form a perfect seal against each other or against the rotor housing, and thus they leak air. If they formed a perfect seal, each of the dotted pale green lines in figure 1 would rise vertically up the graph. However, because the roots pump rotors leak a small amount of air, the volume of air pumped past the rotors decreases marginally (for a given shaft speed) as the pressure ratio is increased. This explains the tendency of the dotted green lines or ”aisospeeds”a as they are termed, (since the dotted green lines represent the performance of the pump at constant rotational speed), to peel off backwards as the pressure ratio rises.

Finally, we see that figure 1 includes a number of concentric circles ranging in colour from dark blue (inner circle) to pale blue (outermost circle), and that the perimeter of each circle has a number on it. These circles indicate zones of efficiency and provide the user with an indication of what fraction of the power required to turn the compressor input shaft is actually put to useful work pumping air. Armed with this knowledge you will no doubt conclude that in order to get the most out of your Eaton M45 roots pump you would do best to operate it in the zone of maximum efficiency, that is to say, within the dark blue centre circle at an efficiency (from the number along the side) of roughly 67%. Outside of this circle we can see the efficiency of the pump progressively falls.

So, if we put 1kW of work into driving a compressor that is only 67% efficient, what happens to the remaining 33% that isn’t being used to compress the air inducted through the compressor rotors? The simple answer is that it is turned to heat. That is to say, 330W of the 1kW power input to the compressor shaft heats the pump rotors and the pump housing. And it doesn’t end here. Since the air passing through the compressor is cooler than the compressor, this heat is transferred to the air that is ultimately inducted into your engine. Although it is true to say that some of this heat is radiated away from the pump body into the engine bay, the great majority is transferred to the pumped air.

Since roots pumps are generally the most inefficient of the forced induction pumps, they have a reputation for transferring the most heat to the air inducted into the engine. However, as with any forced induction pump, this can be dealt with by means of a water-to-air or air-to-air intercooler mounted after the pump.

Now, you may ask, why is it necessary to cool the air leaving the pump? After all, your typical engine runs fairly hot and it’s not as if a bit of hot air down the inlet manifold is going to hurt the engine ”“ is it? There are actually two reasons why the air should be cooled before entering the engine. The first, and most important, is due to the fact that the power output of an engine has very little to do with the pressure to which the pump pumps the inlet manifold. It has, more specifically (as stated in the third paragraph of this post) to do with the mass of air, inducted into the engine, and the relationship between the mass of air inducted into and engine and the pressure at which is inducted, depends upon, you guessed it, the temperature of the air. Point of fact, regardless of the pressure at which you pump air into your engine, the cooler the air, the greater the mass of air you will induct into your engine and thus the greater the power your engine will be able to deliver (with the right amount of fuel combined, obviously). This is why I find the habit of quoting the value to which various engines have been boosted so damn ridiculous. I couldn’t actually care to what pressure you have boosted your engine, I care more about the mass of air you are flowing into your engine. Put another way, to say that one engine produces 200hp at 5000rpm and 1bar boost does not mean that another identical engine will produce 200hp at 5000rpm and 1bar boost when the two identical engines have different methods of forced induction and entirely different capacity intercoolers. They could, quite easily (and in fact most likely) be inducting entirely different masses of air, albeit at the same pressure.

The second reason for wanting to keep the air cool is the occurrence of detonation. Detonation is a phenomenon that occurs in the combustion chamber (in place of combustion) when the fuel and air are combined under conditions of high pressure and/or high temperature. I won’t go into the physics of exactly what constitutes a detonation here, but a detonation is, as you have probably guessed, a violent explosion of the fuel rather than a progressive burn. Needless to say, sustained detonation of the fuel in the combustion chamber is not a good thing due to the likelihood of damage to the engine. Aside from the benefit of inducting the maximum mass of air into the engine, keeping the temperature of the air as cool as possible is one mechanism to avoid detonation when operating the engine at high pressure (such as in the case of a high air-pump pressure of high compression ratio).

In my next post I will explain how to calculate the mass of air inducted into the combustion chambers using some basic facts about the M42 engine. We will then look at how to interpret this data to estimate the engines power output at various engine rpm.
Last edited by GeoffBob on Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image

"It is amazing how many drivers, even at the Formula-1 level, think that brakes are for slowing the car down." - Mario Andretti
rix313
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Silverstone
Contact:

Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:12 pm

Cool :D

Thanks for explaining the blue bits they did baffle me abit. Can that dark blue bit also explain why they have good low down torque? Because the pressure ratio is lower so less pressure is able to leak?
User avatar
Aubs
Aka Mr_Gerbic_iS
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Nr Cambridge

Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:05 pm

Nice article GeoffBob. I look forward to the next.
GeoffBob
Forced Induction Specialist
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:35 am

Thanks Aubs. I realise that this level of detail isn't everyones cup of tea, but I like to type it up as a reference for those like yourself who are interested.

Rich, it's unlikely that the slightly improved efficiency of the darker blue areas contribute much to the improved low down torque delivered by a roots pump, although there is no doubt in my mind that while operating a roots pump at its most efficient the pump will be less of a drain on the total power output of the engine.

One way to think of it is as a pie. If the whole pie accounts for say 100hp, then a slice of that pie has to be consumed to drive the pump. basically, the more efficient the pump the smaller the slice of pie the pump requires, and therefore the more pie there is left at the flywheel for you.

Another way to look at it is to consider what total power your engine must produce in order to deliver say 50hp to the flywheel so that you can cruise along the motorway at say 70mph. If your pump is operating in its most efficient area of the flow map then it may cost your engine only 3hp to drive the pump, and that means your engines total power output is only 53hp (and thus your fuel bill equates to 53hp). However, if the pump is at its most inefficient your engine may have to produce a total of 55hp to achieve 50hp at the flywheel (and thus your fuel bill now equates to 55hp).

There are a number of reasons why it is a good idea to design any forced induction system to pass through the zone or island of highest efficiency on the flow map. Fuel economy is certainly one of them, but keeping the temperature of the air inducted into the engine down is probably the most important.

Oh, and I almost forgot, the reason a roots pump has a reputation for delivering good low down torque is due to the fact that a roots pump is essentially (as described in my first post) a constant volume pump. Many believe that superchargers give good low down torque because they are driven off the crankshaft, unlike turbochargers which are driven by the momentum of the exhaust gas. This is only partly the case. Even the belt driven Rotrex (as much as I love these pumps) cannot match the low down torque of a roots pump since it is a centrifugal pump (like a turbocharger) and not a constant volume pump. This is not to say that one is any better than the other. They all (turbochargers included) have their advantages and disadvantages.
Image

"It is amazing how many drivers, even at the Formula-1 level, think that brakes are for slowing the car down." - Mario Andretti
DHFiS
Old Skooler
Old Skooler
Posts: 2733
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: cambridge

Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:00 pm

Aubs wrote:Nice article GeoffBob. I look forward to the next.
yup, keep it coming :D
Ant
Retired Team Member
Retired Team Member
Posts: 10496
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 11:00 pm
Location: PD+E dept :D
Contact:

Sun Aug 09, 2009 1:51 pm

Excellent GeoffBob :thumb:

feel free to add to the WIki too dude !
Product Development and Endurance for Delphi.

Original performance chips, original works not unlicensed copies :D Email FTW
User avatar
HMC
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:00 pm

Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:18 pm

This is a very good article, will be following with interest.
GeoffBob
Forced Induction Specialist
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:00 pm

Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:26 pm

Many thanks for the comments gents. Ant, I will look at adding this to the Wiki when it is complete.

To recap then, to estimate the output power of a supercharged engine we need to determine the mass of air inducted into the combustion chambers. This is of course a non-trivial exercise since, in the case of a supercharger, the pressure at which the air is being inducted into the engine is a function of the engines rotational speed (because the supercharger is indirectly driven off the engines crankshaft).

Starting with the basics, we would expect the volume of air and fuel, or charge as it is termed, inducted into each combustion chamber to be equal to the volume of each cylinder with the piston displaced to bottom-dead-centre (BDC), termed the displaced volume. Thus, if we know the pressure to which the inlet manifold has been pressurised by the pump, as well as the temperature of the air heated by the pump, we can surely apply the universal gas law to determine the mass of air inducted into the engine? Unfortunately it is not quite as simple as this due to the fact that there may well be a pressure drop over the inlet valves as charge is drawn into the engine (so that the pressure inside the cylinders is effectively less than the pressurised manifold), there may be an overlap in inlet and exhaust valve timing (allowing some of the inducted air to escape into the exhaust), and there may be resonance effects due to the finite inertia (mass) of the air which takes time to both speed up and slow down when inducted into each combustion chamber.

These are all difficult phenomena to take into account on their own, and while they can be individually accounted for in our calculations (as a function of say valve size, number of valves, cam-shaft timing etc..) this is beyond the scope of this thread. Instead we bundle all of these phenomena together, very conveniently, into a single property call volumetric efficiency. Volumetric efficiency is a unitless parameter (as a function of engine speed) that conveniently describes what fraction of the mass of air drawn into the engine, calculated using the ideal gas law, is actually drawn into (and remains in) the combustion chamber for the purpose of driving the crankshaft. Since volumetric efficiency is a fraction we expect its value to lie somewhere between 0 and 1, although in reality it can exceed a value of 1 (marginally) due to resonance effects that in fact allow more charge to enter the combustion chamber than the ideal gas law predicts.

Now, a few facts about this thing called volumetric efficiency to help make it easier for you to understand.
  • 1) Engines with larger valves and/or a greater number of valves per cylinder generally have a higher volumetric efficiency due to a reduced pressure drop over the valves. This means that they can induct a greater mass of air into the combustion chamber than a lesser engine of identical cubic capacity.
    2) Redesigning the inlet and exhaust manifold will change the volumetric efficiency of an engine (as in fact will changing any aspect of the inlet or exhaust system). Specifically, changing the length and diameter of the inlet and exhaust header tubes will significantly influence the engine speed at which the engine can drawn in and expel the greatest mass of air.
    3) Cam-shafts, since they control the height to which a valve is opened (as a function of the angle of rotation of the crankshaft), have a significant effect upon volumetric efficiency. In fact, changing cam-shafts in order to extract more power from an engine is little else other than an exercise in increasing the engine’s volumetric efficiency.
    4) Anything that you do to increase the volumetric efficiency of an engine at one engine speed can very easily decrease its volumetric efficiency at another. One such example of this would be a purpose-built normally aspirated track engine with very short inlet runners and a pair of long duration cam-shafts. An engine such as this will likely produce a very high torque at high engine speed (resulting in a high power output) due to its very high volumetric efficiency (typically >1) at high engine speed. So long as these type of engines are kept ”aon cam”a they can produce up to 1.3, possibly 1.4, times the power output of the stock engine. However, ”aoff cam”a is an altogether different story, with the volumetric efficiency (and thus the engine torque and power) well below that of the stock engine at that engine speed.
    5) A plot of torque as a function of engine speed (typically obtained from a dynamometer) for a normally aspirated engine is the closest you will get to seeing a graph of that engines volumetric efficiency (well at least a graph of similar shape), since it is the volumetric efficiency of a normally aspirated engine that most strongly influences its output torque.
    6) Fitting any forced induction pump to an engine changes that engines volumetric efficiency only if it effects the ability of the engine to induct or expel air. This is particularly true of a turbocharged engine whose exhaust is effectively obscured by the turbocharger’s turbine wheel. However, provided we know the inlet manifold pressure as a function of the air flowed through the turbocharger or supercharger compressor (as determined using the compressor flow map), we need not modify the engines volumetric efficiency as a result of the effect of the compressor.
Thus, since a supercharger does not obstruct the exhaust in any way, it is sufficient for our calculations if we know the volumetric efficiency of our M42 engine prior to fitting the supercharger.

Now, the volumetric efficiency of a typical 4-valve per cylinder M42 engine may be approximated by the equation:

Image
Equation 1

where N is the engine speed in rotations per second (rps). To convert engine speed in rpm to engine speed in rps simply divide by 60, since there are sixty seconds in a minute. For example, at an engine speed of 2400rpm, N=2400/60=56rps. Thus, from equation 1, ev=0.97 (at 2400rpm). Shown below is a graph of equation 1 plotted (in this case) as a function of engine speed in rpm. At this point I must emphasise that this is only an approximation of the M42 engine’s volumetric efficiency. I cannot possibly know the specific details of each and every engine and each persons individual modifications. Equation 1 is, however, a useful place to start in the absence of anything better.

Image
Figure 1: Approximate volumetric efficiency of the 1800cc 16-valve M42 engine as a function of engine speed.

So, now that we have a reasonable definition of and approximation to the M42’s volumetric efficiency we can (finally) set about calculating the mass of air inducted into the engine. Applying the universal gas law, the mass of the charge (fuel and air) inducted into an engine every two rotations of the crank (because this is a 4-stoke engine) is determined by:

Image
Equation 2

Where
mc is the mass of charge inducted into the engine,
ev is the volumetric efficiency at some engine speed N (determined from equation 1),
Pm is the pressure of the air in the inlet manifold in units of pascals,
Vd is the displacement of the engine in units of cubic meters (in this case 0.0018 m^3 since the M42 is an 1800cc engine),
nc is the molar mass of the charge, which is approximately the molar mass of air (0.029kg/mol),
R is the universal gas constant (8.3144 Joule/Kelvin.mol), and
Tm is the temperature of the air in the manifold in units of kelvins.

To convert from units of ”˜C to kelvin simply add 273. In other words, 20’C=293 kelvins.

Now, the mass of charge drawn into the engine is simply the sum of the mass of air and the mass of fuel, thus:

Image
Equation 3

where
ma is the mass of air in kg,
mf is the mass of fuel in kg, and
F is the mass ratio of fuel to air (and is the inverse of what we commonly know as the air-fuel-ratio or AFR).

Substituting Equation 3 into equation 2:

Image
Equation 4

This is the mass of air inducted into the engine every two rotations of the crankshaft (every four strokes of the engine). Note that this is a function of engine speed since ev, our volumetric efficiency, is a function of engine speed. Also note that equation 4 indicates that the mass of air inducted into the engine is proportional the inlet air pressure divided by the inlet air temperature. What this tells us is that to increase the output power of our engine we should increase the pressure of the air from our compressor and/or decrease the temperature of the air inducted into the engine. Likewise, if the rise in pressure due to the work done by the compressor results in a proportional increase in the temperature of the air inducted into the engine, then the ratio of the pressure to temperature remains the same, and thus the actual mass of air inducted into the engine (even though we have pressurised the manifold) remains the same as before!

In my next post I will demonstrate how to calculate the temperature Tm of the air in the manifold so that we can finally solve equation 4 as a function of the manifold pressure and engine speed in order to determine the engines output power.
Image

"It is amazing how many drivers, even at the Formula-1 level, think that brakes are for slowing the car down." - Mario Andretti
User avatar
mattrs
E30 Zone Squatter
E30 Zone Squatter
Posts: 1810
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:00 pm

Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:31 pm

Very interesting!
User avatar
hoshy
E30 Zone Wiki Guru
E30 Zone Wiki Guru
Posts: 4118
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Munich

Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:19 pm

I've not read it end to end yet Geoff but still it's clear that this is a great piece of work. Well done and thanks.
E46 M3 CSL but dreaming of another E30.
User avatar
pilt
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm

Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:34 pm

Very good read.

Since you know your stuff and a lot more then me could you answer me this? I have a M20 turbo with a H1C running about 10psi currently. With this configuration i see boost at about 3000rpm and below this the car behaves similar to standard. Now if I had a m45 supercharger could i use this as well upto 3000 rpm (flowing into the turbo inlet and with an electronic clutch to disengage it at 3000rpm). Another TB would opened above 3000 rpm to supply air directly to the turbo inlet. Would this work with this supercharger?

I realize this is a bit off topic but you sound like the guy to ask!

Cheers

Dan
GeoffBob
Forced Induction Specialist
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:00 pm

Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:04 pm

Hi Dan.

I'm not sure about Eaton's products but the Toyota SC12 roots pump (which displaces 1.2 litres of air per revolution of its shaft, compared to 0.75 litres on the Eaton45) can be harvested from a Toyota 4AGZE (as found in the back of some MR2's I think) with an electromagnetic clutch. It is then quite possible to do exactly what you have described (although exactly how you would find room around an M20 I don't know, but I guess anything is possible).

There are various ways in which the roots pump can be combined with a turbocharger, but the usual route is to fit a bypass valve around the roots pump that activates slightly before the electomagnetic clutch on the pump pulley lets go of the pump. On the Lancia Delta S4, for example, air was inducted into the supercharger at low RPM through the turbocharger compressor. So the order of components went turbo, then roots pump, and then engine. However, once the exhaust had spooled up the turbine, and the pressure at the turbo compressor outlet exceeded a certain value, the roots pump would be bypassed and the turbo would essentially pump air directly into the engine (via the bypass valve). This is exactly how a friend of mine added an SC12 to his Toyota 3SGTE engine. The Lancia Delta S4, however, incorporated two air-to-air intercoolers - one between the turbo and the supercharger, and the other between the supercharger and engine.

A sequential system such as this is certainly not the easiest to integrate into a confined space, but done properly it results in a seamless supply of torque from one end of the rev-counter to the other.

Regards
Geoff
Image

"It is amazing how many drivers, even at the Formula-1 level, think that brakes are for slowing the car down." - Mario Andretti
rix313
E30 Zone Team Member
E30 Zone Team Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Silverstone
Contact:

Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:10 pm

How big does the bypass valve have to be for such a system Geoff?
GeoffBob
Forced Induction Specialist
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:00 pm

Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:22 pm

Well, all depends on the mass of air your turbo has to pump into the engine and at what temperature. If we are dealing with 3" plumbing (or thereabouts) then the bypass valve would typically be the same size or larger. FYI, the valve is not an open and shut affair, it progressively pypasses the supercharger as the boost from the turbo increases. Also, it's not absolutley essential to incorporate and electromagnetic clutch into this system but it does help make it more efficient (the Lancia didn't have one so far as I am aware, so the roots pump was kept spinning all the time, even when fully bypassed).
Image

"It is amazing how many drivers, even at the Formula-1 level, think that brakes are for slowing the car down." - Mario Andretti
User avatar
pilt
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm

Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:58 am

Cheers Geoff, I will check that supercharger out

I was imagining something the other way round with the supercharger feeding the turbo inlet to simplify things! Here is a diagram:

Image

I havent drawn the intercooler but this is on the outlet of the turbo which then goes to the engine TB. This way all the air going into the engine goes through the same intercooler

The TB would be a stepper motor type off a more modern car whioch allows the valve to be opened as required (3", same diameter as turbo inlet, or maybe bigger to reduce pressure drop). Is there any advatages/disadvatages to which comes first, the turbo or supercharger?
User avatar
Y_Cymro
E30 Zone Newbie
E30 Zone Newbie
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: South Wales

Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:17 am

GeoffBob wrote:Also, it's not absolutley essential to incorporate and electromagnetic clutch into this system but it does help make it more efficient (the Lancia didn't have one so far as I am aware, so the roots pump was kept spinning all the time, even when fully bypassed).
The s4 was certainly a wonderous bit of kit. I think it had a centrifugal clutch which disengaged the supercharger at around 4000rpm when the single turbo did its thing. Later models had the supercharger and two small turbos 8O
Image
GeoffBob
Forced Induction Specialist
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:00 pm

Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:32 am

pilt wrote:I was imagining something the other way round with the supercharger feeding the turbo inlet to simplify things!
Dan, what you have described here can be made to work just fine so long as your ECU has precise control over the electrically operated butterfly valve. An easier and more popular way, however, to implement the setup you have described is to simply fit a vacuum operated poppet valve in place of the butterfly valve. At such time as the airflow from the supercharger is less than that required by the turbocharger the pressure at the inlet to the turbocharger will fall below atmospheric and the poppet valve is simply sucked open, supplying air directly to the turbocharger through your second air filter.

FYI, the poppet valve functions like a soft rubber ball pushed against the edge of a round hole. Under pressure it seals against the edge of the hole, and under vacuum it is sucked open and rests against a support arm. Unfortunately, some of the turbo's performance is sacrificed in a system like this due to the pressure drop over the poppet valve at the inlet to the turbocharger.

Another important thing to realise about a system like this is that the roots pump will only make boost so long as the turbo is not (because it has not yet spooled up). In other words it essentially has to force air past the turbo's compressor into the engine. However, as the turbo spools up the pressure at the inlet to the turbocharger will progressively drop as the turbocharger attempts to flow more air than the supercharger can supply at its given RPM. The supercharger therefore follows a path through its flow map that is VERY different to the one that I posted above for a supercharger only engine. The opening of the poppet valve is however seamless and, having once had the opportunity to drive a car like this, is a wonder to behold!
Image

"It is amazing how many drivers, even at the Formula-1 level, think that brakes are for slowing the car down." - Mario Andretti
Post Reply