With the 2.3 conversion, I know the S14 is based on the M10, but I was under the impression that the water channels in the head did not line up with standard M10 bottom ends?e21Jason wrote:Hi Guys
Iam also building a fast m10 for an e21 race car, I picked up a genuine NOS BMW mortorsport big valve head, I got a lot of stuff from the USA billet rocker arms, 316 cam, light weight valves, springs, caps. I still have to source a o2 tii forged crank, & spec the forged pistons, but i do have a set of pauter rods S/H that wiegh less than half a standard rod.
My sister lices in the states so she bring the parts home at christmas.
But i do have a m10 engine converet to a 2.3 16v (in bits) using s14 parts that i might sell, and a set of slide throttle bodies as I cannot use them for my grp 1 race car as i am stuck with K-jet and a twin webber manifold.
Also in the USA Stahl sell a header kit (U-weld) that you may be able to modify as a staring pont
Jason
Is it possible to retain the 318i head, and just use the S14 crank and conrods to do the 2.3 conversion?
I know where to get an S14 with a destroyed head and perfect bottom end for next to nothing so I would be very interested if you could enlighten me on this. (anyone else who has heard about it being done, please share as well)
Also, I know that there is an unofficial 2.0L limit on inline 4s due to the stroke of an inline 4 exponentially increasing the magnitude of vertical vibration.
Porsche borrowed the balance shaft dampening method that Mitsubishi used to allow displacement above 2.0L on the 924 / 944, but as far as I am aware, the M10 / S14 does not employ this method, which is probably why the S14s shake themselves to bits over time.
Would a 2.3L 318i have a serious problem with vibration, or would it just give it character?