
Any suggestions or others with similar aggravations lol
PS the car runs great so no problems there.
Moderator: martauto
Which is generally what manufacturers' try to design into their suspension! Another BMW engineering success.classictwiggy wrote:My 316i just wont slide in the wet- .
How do you drive? If doesnt just oversteer unless you plant the throttle mid corner..Cypriotgeeza wrote:makes me laugh the way this is the EXACT opposite of my iS!!
a bit of water on the road and a sharpish bend and bye bye back endlol
good luck in your quest for sideways action mate
Assuming the suspension is in reasonable order, with decent bushes fitted - not the original twenty year old ones, and doesn't have a "60mm drop"!Leemc2009 wrote:BMW's handle very well - ultimate driving machine..
This reply has made my dayyyyy brighterBladerider wrote:Weld the rear diff
60psi in the rear tyres, preferably no bigger than 165
Dont be gay
Simples !!!
i agree with jonJon_Bmw wrote:Righto!NayC wrote: TBH though, the 316i is a reasonable little car and will corner better than pretty much any stock hatchback that younger lads can get insured in or afford.
Alex wrote:i agree with jonJon_Bmw wrote:Righto!NayC wrote: TBH though, the 316i is a reasonable little car and will corner better than pretty much any stock hatchback that younger lads can get insured in or afford.
my 1.0 12v corsa handled way better around town and smaller streets/roads than my IS
although once over 40mph the IS is better
Jon_Bmw wrote:Righto!NayC wrote: TBH though, the 316i is a reasonable little car and will corner better than pretty much any stock hatchback that younger lads can get insured in or afford.
Nice to see your classic wit and humour isn't dwindling in your old age Mr G.Bladerider wrote:A fairly cheapo rwd car designed in the 70's is not about to win a nimbleness competition with a similarly cheap fwd car (that actually costs less to manufacture - hence its price) thats been designed in the last 5 years !!!
Round a track with a ton of mods is a different question, but one which can easily last forever as mods are just dependent on budget rather than whats best !!
In general RWD cars offer a better performance envelope and balance, but comparing a 316 and a Saxo on handling is like comparing a kettle and a toaster at which is best at ironing !!!
![]()
More speed!classictwiggy wrote:My 316i just wont slide in the wet- on oil its fine but wont even drift an inch in the wet. It gets me down![]()
Any suggestions or others with similar aggravations lol
PS the car runs great so no problems there.
we´re assuming the 316 is an e30, hence designed in the eighties...Bladerider wrote:A fairly cheapo rwd car designed in the 70's is not about to win a nimbleness competition with a similarly cheap fwd car (that actually costs less to manufacture - hence its price) thats been designed in the last 5 years !!!
Round a track with a ton of mods is a different question, but one which can easily last forever as mods are just dependent on budget rather than whats best !!
In general RWD cars offer a better performance envelope and balance, but comparing a 316 and a Saxo on handling is like comparing a kettle and a toaster at which is best at ironing !!!
![]()
Sorry to sound pedantic, and I know Im only a noob on this forum, but given that the E30 went on sale in 1982 I suspect it was designed before they started selling them, or crash testing them, or retooled the plant to actually manufacture them, or got supporting manufacturers up to speed on parts, or got board approval for the funding and final design etc etc so I suspect they were originally conceived in the very late 70's and even if they were done in 1980 it will still effectively be based on principles from the 70's as opposed to all the experience gained from the first few months of "The 80's" lolcool_ram_in wrote:we´re assuming the 316 is an e30, hence designed in the eighties...