the sound would be
yes i know an engine conversion would be better but im a deluded IS owner
Moderator: martauto





i had a 323f 18i executive that was well quick.i sold it as they were mostly driven by birds or male hair dressersAlex wrote:noits more for the sound
it better be quicker than my mates 2.0 v6 mazda shitehe keeps going on about it being a v6 and fast




Turbo-Brown wrote:You'd be a hundred times better off using ITBs on your engine than stepping back into the dark ages with carbs.
With EFI, you can get your fueling correct for any combination of engine speed and throttle opening. With carbs, you can spend a fortune trying to get your fueling right.
Unless you're into historic racing or something, forget about carbs dude
well it had sel written all over itmagpie wrote:i had a 323f 18i executive that was well quick.i sold it as they were mostly driven by birds or male hair dressersAlex wrote:noits more for the sound
it better be quicker than my mates 2.0 v6 mazda shitehe keeps going on about it being a v6 and fast
i got for £250 under a tree for a yr
moped it up mot and taxed sold for £1100![]()
a nice car a/c and some nice toys.but fwd wrongness and a fat ass.
but a nice prophet

Awesome. My friend/tuning-rival is just about to start work on making his twin cam EFi Ford engine into a carb feeder. Sometimes I think I'm going to need to break the bank at A-Tech to have a car faster than his. Other times I know I can just sit back and let him be a spoon.Turbo-Brown wrote:You'd be a hundred times better off using ITBs on your engine than stepping back into the dark ages with carbs.
With EFI, you can get your fueling correct for any combination of engine speed and throttle opening. With carbs, you can spend a fortune trying to get your fueling right.
Unless you're into historic racing or something, forget about carbs dude
that's the joby i meant,the only way to go before the turbo!Turbo-Brown wrote:You'd be a hundred times better off using ITBs on your engine than stepping back into the dark ages with carbs.
With EFI, you can get your fueling correct for any combination of engine speed and throttle opening. With carbs, you can spend a fortune trying to get your fueling right.
Unless you're into historic racing or something, forget about carbs dude

wor lass hated it she smacked her head getting in the first time.Alex wrote:
personally i think there ugly things, there trying to hard to look like coupes but have too many doors

Good post /\, take note people.Turbo-Brown wrote:You'd be a hundred times better off using ITBs on your engine than stepping back into the dark ages with carbs.
With EFI, you can get your fueling correct for any combination of engine speed and throttle opening. With carbs, you can spend a fortune trying to get your fueling right.
Unless you're into historic racing or something, forget about carbs dude

his v6 has 138bhp and weighs 1700kgmagpie wrote:wor lass hated it she smacked her head getting in the first time.Alex wrote:
personally i think there ugly things, there trying to hard to look like coupes but have too many doors
so it had to go,she said it had horrible eyes.and was ugly.
when you shut the door and forget all this,they are quick.
the v6,well i had a guy boast to me that his will do 140 mph.
he said this at a filling station.but mine was nipping clean.
nob,my cars faster than yours.may be but mine cost £250
I meant as in M42 in standard guise is abit poor... but with only a few quid spent it can give decent gains and then if your really crazy can give it nearly 6 times the power it has orginally:twisted: So it really is a good engine to modifywhy would the power be shite

