Nic01101011 wrote:Why is a new exhaust manifold required, does the e36 one not fit in the engine bay?
Slightly different to the US cars as we are RHD, so the steering linkage runs through where the manifold/downpipes want to be. Its an ok job to mod the M50/52 bits to clear everything, but a 6 branch that will help power is a logical upgrade.
Cook318IS wrote:Jhonno wrote:
I am still sceptical about Fritz's offering until I see it dyno'd on a reliable rolling road, (Sheps/Sal/Surrey) not Fritz's...
I sort of agree with you there. I think a few of us have found the fritzs dyno to over-read a tad.
Ive only had my old touring on the Fritz RR (just after it was installed), so cant/dont think I should comment on the reliability of results etc, but TBH I wouldnt take any reading as accurate other than from an engine dyno.
Any RR will be useful if you do back to back runs (before and after mods) to show any gains, no matter what that figure is - if one RR gives shows one car at 200bhp, then 210bhp after a chip and exhaust, and then another RR shows the same car at 210bhp before and 220bhp after the same mods then the gains are still the same, just with a slightly different bhp figure.
You surprise me about an s50 manifold won't be as good as an m50 specific manifold, i would of thought that it would be an upgrade? Does that mean that a stainless steel exhaust manifold based m52 manifold that tries to adhere to the physics of exhaust gasflow (obviously still modified to fit an e30) be better than an s50 manifold on in an e30?
As Dan said, the ports are a fair amount bigger on the S50 compared to the M50/52, so I do agree with him in that I dont see how an S50 designed manifold will give good gains on the M50/52 - however, I cant ignore my arse-dyno and Daves M50'd car (which in his own words has been ragged to ****) went very well.