A £10k (ish) 325i sport or Porsche 911
Moderator: martauto
996 head lights are just so tragic.
What were they thinking?!
What were they thinking?!
That's a terrible analogy. I've no doubt the 996 is great to drive, while a 320i auto....bss325i wrote:A 996 C2 is like the 4dr 320i auto of the 911 world.
I'd rather have a nice E46 M3 manual coupe but they are hard to find now at £10k.
E46 m3's have still got that £4999 knob chariot reputation. Suck in the abyss of old car and not yet a classic status. An tidy e36 m3 on the other hand...
Hardly a terrible analogy. Regardless of how they drive, they are both the least sought after and least valuable of their respective type.jonb wrote:That's a terrible analogy. I've no doubt the 996 is great to drive, while a 320i auto....bss325i wrote:A 996 C2 is like the 4dr 320i auto of the 911 world.
I'd rather have a nice E46 M3 manual coupe but they are hard to find now at £10k.
E46 m3's have still got that £4999 knob chariot reputation. Suck in the abyss of old car and not yet a classic status. An tidy e36 m3 on the other hand...
Indeed, the E46 M3 still has a bit of a poor image but prices are on the up and they are better than an E36 M3 in pretty much every respect.
YEAH JON!!bss325i wrote:Hardly a terrible analogy. Regardless of how they drive, they are both the least sought after and least valuable of their respective type.jonb wrote:That's a terrible analogy. I've no doubt the 996 is great to drive, while a 320i auto....bss325i wrote:A 996 C2 is like the 4dr 320i auto of the 911 world.
I'd rather have a nice E46 M3 manual coupe but they are hard to find now at £10k.
E46 m3's have still got that £4999 knob chariot reputation. Suck in the abyss of old car and not yet a classic status. An tidy e36 m3 on the other hand...
Indeed, the E46 M3 still has a bit of a poor image but prices are on the up and they are better than an E36 M3 in pretty much every respect.
Lets have it right, the 320i is a great drive.. smooth with adequate power. Granted the value may be low, but that's only down to preference of the scene. A B20 is as reliable and useable (even in this day and age) as the rest of them.
Stop crying Nick. It was a long running opinion on the zone (way before you joined) that a 320i auto FOUR DOOR was about as desirable as bum cancer.Mitchen wrote:YEAH JON!!bss325i wrote:Hardly a terrible analogy. Regardless of how they drive, they are both the least sought after and least valuable of their respective type.jonb wrote: That's a terrible analogy. I've no doubt the 996 is great to drive, while a 320i auto....
E46 m3's have still got that £4999 knob chariot reputation. Suck in the abyss of old car and not yet a classic status. An tidy e36 m3 on the other hand...
Indeed, the E46 M3 still has a bit of a poor image but prices are on the up and they are better than an E36 M3 in pretty much every respect.
Lets have it right, the 320i is a great drive.. smooth with adequate power. Granted the value may be low, but that's only down to preference of the scene. A B20 is as reliable and useable (even in this day and age) as the rest of them.
Little has changed.

Jon didnt mention 4 doors.. and the operative word being 'opinion'bss325i wrote:Stop crying Nick. It was a long running opinion on the zone (way before you joined) that a 320i auto FOUR DOOR was about as desirable as bum cancer.Mitchen wrote:YEAH JON!!bss325i wrote: Hardly a terrible analogy. Regardless of how they drive, they are both the least sought after and least valuable of their respective type.
Indeed, the E46 M3 still has a bit of a poor image but prices are on the up and they are better than an E36 M3 in pretty much every respect.
Lets have it right, the 320i is a great drive.. smooth with adequate power. Granted the value may be low, but that's only down to preference of the scene. A B20 is as reliable and useable (even in this day and age) as the rest of them.
Little has changed.

No but I did and he quoted me.Mitchen wrote:Jon didnt mention 4 doors.. and the operative word being 'opinion'
Let me rephrase opinion, the general consensus is that the performance of an 318i with worse fuel consumption than a 325i and the surplus of doors made for it being the runt of the litter.
Whens the eta bottom end going in?

Lol well it suits me just fine.
There will be no molestation of my treasured engine.. you saw how distressing it was for me to put that B25 manifold on.. it took me a couple of hours just to give the thumbs up.
It's had 25 years of pampering and it'll continue to get that for the rest of it's existence.

There will be no molestation of my treasured engine.. you saw how distressing it was for me to put that B25 manifold on.. it took me a couple of hours just to give the thumbs up.
It's had 25 years of pampering and it'll continue to get that for the rest of it's existence.
-
- Tech 1 freak
- Posts: 7634
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: in the garage
Good to keep these old chariots original, you'd never catch me skipping an auto box.......much...
-
- Engaged to the E30 Zone
- Posts: 6265
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:00 pm
The M20B20 is a lovely engine compared to other makes offerings, compared to a 1.2 multi air lump it's a RR engine.
But compared to the more efficient M42/44 or the B25 it is hard to justify its power and economy.
I did see a 996 with the lights masked and painted, it seems the one exception where that actually improves to look of the car.
Possibly because the original ones look so out of place?
A car in need of aftermarket headlights to improve the melted 911 headlight look?
Edit - looks like this might actually be a "fix" for the 996.
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/996/ ... ion-4.html
But compared to the more efficient M42/44 or the B25 it is hard to justify its power and economy.
I did see a 996 with the lights masked and painted, it seems the one exception where that actually improves to look of the car.
Possibly because the original ones look so out of place?
A car in need of aftermarket headlights to improve the melted 911 headlight look?
Edit - looks like this might actually be a "fix" for the 996.
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/996/ ... ion-4.html
Last edited by HairyScreech on Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
2.8 development thread http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... c&t=170822
m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&
m3.3.1 m20 thread - now running, chip needed - any volunteers?
http://www.e30zone.net/modules.php?name ... =viewtopic&
-
- E30 Zone Team Member
- Posts: 18168
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Iver heath. South bucks.
bss325i wrote:Stop crying Nick. It was a long running opinion on the zone (way before you joined) that a 320i auto FOUR DOOR was about as desirable as bum cancer.Mitchen wrote:YEAH JON!!bss325i wrote: Hardly a terrible analogy. Regardless of how they drive, they are both the least sought after and least valuable of their respective type.
Indeed, the E46 M3 still has a bit of a poor image but prices are on the up and they are better than an E36 M3 in pretty much every respect.
Lets have it right, the 320i is a great drive.. smooth with adequate power. Granted the value may be low, but that's only down to preference of the scene. A B20 is as reliable and useable (even in this day and age) as the rest of them.
Little has changed.
You're nasty !!!!

- Cypriotgeeza
- E30 Zone Addict
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Under a bonnet somewhere..
Give me one of these please:

If not ill settle for this


Neither near the 10k mark but I'd still love them alongside my E30

If not ill settle for this



Neither near the 10k mark but I'd still love them alongside my E30

Check my M30 build threads:
Project Frankenstein: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=194154
Headgasket: viewtopic.php?f=55&t=165704
Clutch issues: viewtopic.php?f=55&t=172482
Instagram: www.instagram.com/Cypriotgeeza
Project Frankenstein: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=194154
Headgasket: viewtopic.php?f=55&t=165704
Clutch issues: viewtopic.php?f=55&t=172482
Instagram: www.instagram.com/Cypriotgeeza
Must be hard knowing that the Proton Preve gsx has more power than you.Mitchen wrote:Lol well it suits me just fine.![]()
There will be no molestation of my treasured engine.. you saw how distressing it was for me to put that B25 manifold on.. it took me a couple of hours just to give the thumbs up.
It's had 25 years of pampering and it'll continue to get that for the rest of it's existence.
- beautymeanswheels
- E30 Zone Newbie
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:00 pm
HairyScreech wrote:If you don't need 4 seat then 10k buys a lot of car. 10k is now the bottom end of the Z4M market. V10 M5s fall into that as well as lots of ageing merc AMG stuff.
However there are still older and nicer looking 911s for 10k out there than the 996.
I can't understand why anyone would pay the kind of prices E30 M3s go for, at £30k and likely needing a load of work you can get a first generation dodge viper.
I wouldn't pay £30k for an e30 m3 either unless I had tried everything out at that price and then really wanted one. Even then I would only get it to store away for a couple of years and then sell lol. Z4M coupe only for me but a good one is 13-14k+.
E55 AMG though...
I remember reading an interview with a Porsche specialist regarding 911 prices, he was of the opinion that it won't be too long before it will be impossible to find a naturally aspirated manual 911 for under £20k. Especially when all 911's will have a turbo of some description. Even the rumored NA manual 911R(991R?) will be a limited edition model and stupidly expensive. As more builders fettle with the 996 and Boxster, people will start waking up to the potential of these cars. Despite the costs the unique ownership prospect is hard to ignore.
For £10k - £15k you could probably find a decent 996, factor in some preventative work via fixed price servicing/repairs from various specialists (great for knowing what you're getting yourself into) or for even more peace of mind you can sign up to a maintenance plan for a monthly fee.
A clean 325i is definitely not something you'd want to use as much as a 996 that's used to being driven hard and improved over the years. The 325i is pretty much what it is out of the factory, and if it's that mint it's done all the appreciating it's going to do. You'll end up just looking at it and taking it for a gentle drive on a sunny Sunday. Thrashing a £10k 325i and using it as intended is the quickest way of making it a £5k 325i.
I've looked into 996 ownership and it doesn't seem all that hazardous. Specialists with good reputations do make prices easier to stomach. RPM Technik, Revolution Porsche, JMG Porsche, Autofarm, RSJ and Hartech, to name but a few, help shine a light on the unknown.
If I had garage space I'd buy a cheapo Boxster off ebay and pull it apart just to learn more about the set up. I've personally always preferred a mid/rear engined layout. The light front end is hard to replicate with anything front engined, and the weight/noise/surge of acceleration from behind is heavenly (that's what she said!).
In the latest Evo magazine's 'market watch' section, a previous E46 M3 owner says their 911 is a completely different animal. I can believe that. The 3 series is essentially a three box saloon primarily designed for practical duties first and foremost, and adapted for more sportier applications, but still essentially compromised.
The Porsche Boxster/Cayman/911 are sports cars from inception.
For £10k - £15k you could probably find a decent 996, factor in some preventative work via fixed price servicing/repairs from various specialists (great for knowing what you're getting yourself into) or for even more peace of mind you can sign up to a maintenance plan for a monthly fee.
A clean 325i is definitely not something you'd want to use as much as a 996 that's used to being driven hard and improved over the years. The 325i is pretty much what it is out of the factory, and if it's that mint it's done all the appreciating it's going to do. You'll end up just looking at it and taking it for a gentle drive on a sunny Sunday. Thrashing a £10k 325i and using it as intended is the quickest way of making it a £5k 325i.
I've looked into 996 ownership and it doesn't seem all that hazardous. Specialists with good reputations do make prices easier to stomach. RPM Technik, Revolution Porsche, JMG Porsche, Autofarm, RSJ and Hartech, to name but a few, help shine a light on the unknown.
If I had garage space I'd buy a cheapo Boxster off ebay and pull it apart just to learn more about the set up. I've personally always preferred a mid/rear engined layout. The light front end is hard to replicate with anything front engined, and the weight/noise/surge of acceleration from behind is heavenly (that's what she said!).
In the latest Evo magazine's 'market watch' section, a previous E46 M3 owner says their 911 is a completely different animal. I can believe that. The 3 series is essentially a three box saloon primarily designed for practical duties first and foremost, and adapted for more sportier applications, but still essentially compromised.
The Porsche Boxster/Cayman/911 are sports cars from inception.
-
- Married to the E30 Zone
- Posts: 11304
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: In your back passage faster than a rat up a drainpipe!
The choice is very simple - Porsche for the history, prestige, engineering and design. It may not be the best of the bunch, but it's a PORSCHE!!

PONY, 2013 - "Anyway span 360 degrees hitting the kerb and giving the old man two fingers as I was spinning like Michael Schumacher would
In this situation I would choose the Porsche. It really is a no brainer. The Porsche is younger and has much more technology installed for a better/safer ride.
No E30 is worth more than a couple of grand. Spending more on an E30 are for those who have money to burn the only exception in this case would be the E30 M3.
Cars really are just a waste of money - temporary pleasures until your mind has had enough. The sad truth

No E30 is worth more than a couple of grand. Spending more on an E30 are for those who have money to burn the only exception in this case would be the E30 M3.
Cars really are just a waste of money - temporary pleasures until your mind has had enough. The sad truth

Rule number one, a car is only worth what someone is willing to pay.
And people are paying over £10k for non M3 E30's now.
And people are paying over £10k for non M3 E30's now.
[quote="ross_jsy"]No I had a POS Subaru because I am funding myself through a degree. Name something for £1200 that was as fast and fun on a tight budget and I am all ears.
Now do one, bell end
[/quote
insults over the internet, how mature!
Now do one, bell end

insults over the internet, how mature!

-
- Old Skooler
- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Fife - You got a problem with that ?
I'd recommend buying a 996, I've made £5k on the value of mine in just over a year, which is nice. None of the two wheel drive variants, unless it's a GT variant, it's the 4wd versions you want.
1990 325i Cab auto in Alpine White II
1988 Alpina C2.5 moredoor in Black, 71k
1990 325ix, moredoor auto in Laser Blue. 51k
1984 Hartge H35 in Black
2004 996 C4S in Silver 43k manual
2006 Audi S6 V10 in Black 58k
1988 Alpina C2.5 moredoor in Black, 71k
1990 325ix, moredoor auto in Laser Blue. 51k
1984 Hartge H35 in Black
2004 996 C4S in Silver 43k manual
2006 Audi S6 V10 in Black 58k
ross_jsy wrote:This is the exact reason I drive an e30.jon-m42 wrote:The Porsche is younger and has much more technology installed for a better/safer ride.
As long as the op shares the same views then he has his answer.
Other than that Ill allow the porsche to burn my money if i had any at all lol
Why do you say you wouldn't want a 2WD variant?Topblag wrote:I'd recommend buying a 996, I've made £5k on the value of mine in just over a year, which is nice. None of the two wheel drive variants, unless it's a GT variant, it's the 4wd versions you want.
I'd have thought it was the 2WD was a better long term financial prospect.
The 2WD cars keep the 911 core principle at heart. The only 4WD worth having is the Turbo surely.
-
- Married to the E30 Zone
- Posts: 7307
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Jersey, C.I.
If money wasn't part of the equation I would have a Porsche. But it would be an early narrow bodied air cooled car. Followed one a few weeks ago, the distinct thrum of the engine and long punctuated gear changes really got me excitedjon-m42 wrote:ross_jsy wrote:This is the exact reason I drive an e30.jon-m42 wrote:The Porsche is younger and has much more technology installed for a better/safer ride.
As long as the op shares the same views then he has his answer.
Other than that Ill allow the porsche to burn my money if i had any at all lol

-
- Old Skooler
- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Fife - You got a problem with that ?
If you have a sense of self preservation, you take all the grip you can get when you have that much power, great aero and lower weight. I don't want a widow maker, I want lots of fun and making it home afterwards. The 4wd's are quicker in acceleration and cornering. It's usually a 95%/5% split until you need it. That 5% makes a big difference.Jon_Bmw wrote:Why do you say you wouldn't want a 2WD variant?Topblag wrote:I'd recommend buying a 996, I've made £5k on the value of mine in just over a year, which is nice. None of the two wheel drive variants, unless it's a GT variant, it's the 4wd versions you want.
I'd have thought it was the 2WD was a better long term financial prospect.
The 2WD cars keep the 911 core principle at heart. The only 4WD worth having is the Turbo surely.
1990 325i Cab auto in Alpine White II
1988 Alpina C2.5 moredoor in Black, 71k
1990 325ix, moredoor auto in Laser Blue. 51k
1984 Hartge H35 in Black
2004 996 C4S in Silver 43k manual
2006 Audi S6 V10 in Black 58k
1988 Alpina C2.5 moredoor in Black, 71k
1990 325ix, moredoor auto in Laser Blue. 51k
1984 Hartge H35 in Black
2004 996 C4S in Silver 43k manual
2006 Audi S6 V10 in Black 58k
It's only 300 ish bhp...
Lower weight?
the 2wd must weigh less! I think a c2 will be worth more than a c4 in a few years time.
I'd take a turbo over both for future value as the GT3s and GT2s are already mental money, although they are a cracking drive.
Lower weight?

I'd take a turbo over both for future value as the GT3s and GT2s are already mental money, although they are a cracking drive.
-
- Old Skooler
- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Fife - You got a problem with that ?
I wasn't comparing weight from 2wd to 4wd, my point was that with a quick car (because it has power, good aero and is lower weight in comparison to e.g. an M3 or an Audi RS4) you want as much grip as possible.Jon_Bmw wrote:It's only 300 ish bhp...
Lower weight?the 2wd must weigh less! I think a c2 will be worth more than a c4 in a few years time.
I'd take a turbo over both for future value as the GT3s and GT2s are already mental money, although they are a cracking drive.
If the appreciation trend between C2s and C4s changes I'll be surprised. Turbo's are making strong money and show no signs of slowing down.
1990 325i Cab auto in Alpine White II
1988 Alpina C2.5 moredoor in Black, 71k
1990 325ix, moredoor auto in Laser Blue. 51k
1984 Hartge H35 in Black
2004 996 C4S in Silver 43k manual
2006 Audi S6 V10 in Black 58k
1988 Alpina C2.5 moredoor in Black, 71k
1990 325ix, moredoor auto in Laser Blue. 51k
1984 Hartge H35 in Black
2004 996 C4S in Silver 43k manual
2006 Audi S6 V10 in Black 58k