got to replace my cam and followers anyway.
rest of engine will be standard inc log exhaust.
how much low down was lost?
what happened to tickover?
how much top end was gained?
what chip are you using?
is there any reason why it wouldn't work with LPG (future plan)?
anyone tried the mildest cat cam, impacts?
Moderator: martauto
-
hongkongfuey
- Mad-tango-geezer
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:00 pm
- Location: portsmouth
sorry to jump on board ,is that the 273/273 cam? how much and where to get?
if there wern't people like me,
with cars like mine,
who would you put down to make yourself feel better?
with cars like mine,
who would you put down to make yourself feel better?
-
StuBeeDoo
- Engaged to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 6756
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Up My Own Arse
I'm toying with the idea of a mild Cat cam for my 2.3 - when I get 'round to building it.
It will be running about 10:1 compression and possibly larger inlet valves but apart from that will be totally standard and running on LPG (with super unleaded for starting only).
I'm not looking for ultimate power, I want as much mid-range as I can muster.
It will be running about 10:1 compression and possibly larger inlet valves but apart from that will be totally standard and running on LPG (with super unleaded for starting only).
I'm not looking for ultimate power, I want as much mid-range as I can muster.
-
Simon13
- The longest resto in the world !
- Posts: 22697
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Camberley, Surrey don't u know
no i think they do a milder one below this. I have a 273/273 in my touring and it's a peaky hairy little bastard. Big valve lift on thishongkongfuey wrote:sorry to jump on board ,is that the 273/273 cam? how much and where to get?
Livened up my engine a treat
these are they
1300519 part no
264 / 264° duration
227 / 227° maximum lift
11.00 / 11.00mm lift at TDC
1.75 / 1.70mmparts
O.E.M. application
MECH: sport
1300533
272 / 248°
234 / 214°
10.80 / 9.90mm
1.90 / 0.70mm
O.E.M.
MECH: sport
1300519 part no
264 / 264° duration
227 / 227° maximum lift
11.00 / 11.00mm lift at TDC
1.75 / 1.70mmparts
O.E.M. application
MECH: sport
1300533
272 / 248°
234 / 214°
10.80 / 9.90mm
1.90 / 0.70mm
O.E.M.
MECH: sport

Yeah just instaled a 273/273 off ant and its a good cam, coupled with a bbtb i think there is a little bit of touq lost down low, but well worth he pounds.
Btw simon did you change the rockers when you did the cam because i kept the original ones and found the a bit more tappety, also did you use a vernier pully.
thanks.
Btw simon did you change the rockers when you did the cam because i kept the original ones and found the a bit more tappety, also did you use a vernier pully.
thanks.
-
daimlerman
- **BANNED**
- Posts: 15968
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:00 pm
- Location: Grumpy Old Man
If you go for extra capacity(2.7/8) you will get all the torque you need.StuBeeDoo wrote:I'm toying with the idea of a mild Cat cam for my 2.3 - when I get 'round to building it.
It will be running about 10:1 compression and possibly larger inlet valves but apart from that will be totally standard and running on LPG (with super unleaded for starting only).
I'm not looking for ultimate power, I want as much mid-range as I can muster.
-
Simon13
- The longest resto in the world !
- Posts: 22697
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Camberley, Surrey don't u know
i replaced them yes and new eccentrics also. You should always use new rockers with a new cam. Unless the old rockers are perfect
The only reason it went was because it snapped a rocker. The cam was f**ked and worn and the rockers the same. So all new it had to be
The only reason it went was because it snapped a rocker. The cam was f**ked and worn and the rockers the same. So all new it had to be
-
StuBeeDoo
- Engaged to the E30 Zone

- Posts: 6756
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Up My Own Arse
Had this conversation umpteen times over the last 4 years. I've got all the bits - except a chip - to do a 2.3, so 2.3 it will be.daimlerman wrote:If you go for extra capacity(2.7/8) you will get all the torque you need.StuBeeDoo wrote:I'm toying with the idea of a mild Cat cam for my 2.3 - when I get 'round to building it.
It will be running about 10:1 compression and possibly larger inlet valves but apart from that will be totally standard and running on LPG (with super unleaded for starting only).
I'm not looking for ultimate power, I want as much mid-range as I can muster.



