I don't see why a first car necessarily has to be cheap on fuel. If it was going to be used on a daily commute by someone how saw it little more than just transport, maybe, but I see this car was being a weekend/evening hobby sort of thing more than anything. As long as it's not going to cost me anything astronomical, I'll be happy.gBenM wrote:Well yeah, they are terrible as 1st cars =\aceraf wrote: If the touring is 'Too Big, Too Long and too clumsy to make a decent First car', then that applies to all e30's![]()
A first car needs to be cheap on petrol, cheap on insurance and small, an E30 is none of those.
Insurance wise, some companies have said they flat out won't cover me on a BMW, but most have given me some decent quotes, I'm not going to say they're what I'd call cheap, but I've resigned myself to the fact that I'm a Young male and I live in a dump of an area, so insurance is never going to be "cheap". This touring works out It's no more expensive than a 1.4 205 XS, which was the only thing "sensible" I was considering. Anyway, after hearing how much it would have cost to insure my old supra track/project car, anything sounds cheap

When it comes to size, well, that's what this topic was made for. Is it maybe a case that a E30 Touring is one of those cars which feel bigger than they really are? The Megane that we've got seems far smaller, but I can tell you for sure that it's wider than the E30.