pacerpete wrote:Only if you want to spend lots of money to go slower and have a car that is worthless after all the dramas
so is the 3.5 better engine than the m52?
Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:50 pm
by pacerpete
BMWE30325 wrote:
pacerpete wrote:Only if you want to spend lots of money to go slower and have a car that is worthless after all the dramas
so is the 3.5 better engine than the m52?
No, not at all, BUT it is a much better engine for a 635
Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 7:08 pm
by Blitz
M52 in a E24. How wrong would that look?
[youtube][/youtube]
Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 7:58 pm
by pacerpete
Blitz wrote:M52 in a E24. How wrong would that look?
[youtube][/youtube]
Congratulations Yuri, have a cabbage.
The turd that you have spent many months ruining is a sorry piece of scrap
Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:37 pm
by cecotto479
The factory put the V12 in to build the 850 development mule. There's been a few of them done.
M52 is pointless. Best conversion for a b34 is b35.
Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:55 pm
by Speedtouch
pacerpete wrote:
Blitz wrote:M52 in a E24. How wrong would that look?
[youtube][/youtube]
Congratulations Yuri, have a cabbage.
The turd that you have spent many months ruining is a sorry piece of scrap
Shouldn't that be an Asparagus?
Re:
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 8:16 pm
by snakebrain
cecotto479 wrote:The factory put the V12 in to build the 850 development mule. There's been a few of them done.
5.0 V12 in an E24 just oozes rightness!
Re:
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 8:35 pm
by sweep
Rover sd1 v8 powerhouse!?
Re:
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:56 pm
by Andyboy
2.8 Ford Cologne V6 for the win.
Re:
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:52 am
by Speedtouch
Nah, what you want is the 2-litre Ford Pinto lump, as some Irish bogshoite fitted in an E36.
Preferably with a very worn camshaft, so that it clatters in an agricultural way.
Re:
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:26 pm
by cecotto479
Fiat twin cam?
Re:
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:44 pm
by Speedtouch
Actually, that probably wouldn't be so bad in a 635CSi, as they are extremely torquey in 2-litre form.
Re:
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:29 pm
by Phill172
Always wanted one with a e60 35 diesel......
But big car either v8 or v12
Re:
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:08 pm
by sweep
Crossflow......
Re:
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:34 pm
by Dan320is
A series or CVH.
Re:
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:48 pm
by anothere21323i
Another boat anchor - BMC C Series......
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:19 am
by duracel79
Sounds like a great idea to put an M50 into an E24 ........................
With a Turbo
Re:
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:14 pm
by Andyboy
A Rover 2300 straight six with a single turbo blowing through three Ford VV carbs on a cast iron log manifold.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:40 pm
by Speedtouch
Now you're talking, though I would personally prefer to use the Austin Princess 2.2 straight-six.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:36 pm
by Andyboy
Aah, the redoubtable E6. She'd benefit from some headwork but surprisingly, not a bad engine. The Rover unit was okay (the 2600 was very pokey) but the oil drain back valve scuppered many - it used to block, starving the head Nd cam of oil. Standard Leyland dealer practice was to unscrew the valve and give it a distance test* before fitting a replacement head with the valve omitted. Worked fine and increased the oil supply to the cam.
*see how far it can be thrown.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:09 pm
by Speedtouch
Let's not forget the AMC Pacer engine; a vast 3.8/4.2-litre boat anchor that could only muster about 100 bhp and return 17 mpg average. Party on - NOT!
And then, there's the Ford Zephyr/Zodiac lump - I saw a VW Beetle with one hanging out the back of it once; the handling must have been lethal!
Still, both worthy candidates for dropping into an E24...
Re:
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:48 pm
by Eddie25
Big Block Mopar
Re:
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:52 pm
by snakebrain
Here's a very, very nice S54 installation into an E28 that might give you food for thought..