Page 1 of 1

what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:23 am
by 320ise
i think the car its self was fine but the looks were not ///M enough! this AC e36 should have been the std M3 then people would have been able to tell an e36 ///M from a e36 sport (like the E30) i know its all in the past now but saw this pic and thought i would voice my thoughts! and see what other people think of them!


Image
Image

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:35 am
by madaboutthe30
I reckon the car could do with the e36 m3 front, as otherwise it just looks like a normal e36 but with bulked up wings

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:01 am
by e30bmlover
last one to come up for sale the seller wanted 18k for it.... looks better than the dirty six m3.

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:11 am
by zimmerbimmer1
The AC Schnitzer CLSII.

The best one was the geen colour with matching wheels gonna try find a picture.

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:17 am
by zimmerbimmer1
Image

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:26 am
by Gortour
That white one with the bubble arches is lovely.
The CLS could do with the bubble arches too. I think it suits it.

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:23 am
by e30bmlover
i love the dirty sixes with flaired arches( done by schnitzer obviously ) it has the essence of the e30 m3...

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:31 am
by Gortour
Certainly does. I almost want an E36 now...

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:50 pm
by Andyboy
Horrid. That green one looks like it's got Mark 1 Vectra arches grafted on. E36's just don't suit boxy arches.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:56 pm
by dips346
i had a blue one :D till a few weeks ago

Re:

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:29 pm
by Morat
Sorry, but they all ming.

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:47 pm
by Gortour
Andyboy wrote:That green one looks like it's got Mark 1 Vectra arches grafted on. E36's just don't suit boxy arches.
Definately wouldn't have the green one, agreed. I definately like the looks of the white E36 with the bubble arches though.

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:26 am
by afromaan
i once saw one in estoril looked amazing been searching for it for days but couldnt find it. any one got pix of one???

Re:

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 11:17 am
by 320ise
the white one i said above, i think would have been a smoother transition from e30 to e36 due to its inkeeping fat arches some one who knew the e30m3 would havet twigged strait away if the white one above was the std m3. as what i hate with the e36 range is that you could have a tidy 316i coupe slap the m bits on and a badge and without it runnung no one knows really wheather its the real deal or not! this would be alot harder to make a replica like the e30 was and the e46 too to a point.

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:57 pm
by adit
madaboutthe30 wrote:I reckon the car could do with the e36 m3 front, as otherwise it just looks like a normal e36 but with bulked up wings
that's quite close looking to the mtec front bumper/spoiler. maybe needs the little black lip on it though. i much prefer the proper m3 mirrors too.

Re: what the e36 m3 should have been!

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:37 pm
by Falkster
Im sure they were originally going to call it the 330 (pre evo) because it wasn't 'M' enough, it was a fast coupe rather than the proper replacement to the E30....have no idea where it came from though??

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 1:24 pm
by Blitz
Image
Image
Image
Image

Re:

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:23 pm
by 320ise
like them rims!

Re:

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:10 pm
by e30bmlover
:drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: schnitzer have done it again.. what a stunner... oh how pacerpete wouldnt approve!(he still hasnt got any taste :D )