Page 1 of 3

Triumph 2500S

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 4:41 pm
by lance1a
I might buy this just as a project. It's a runner needing a bit of welding, but in generally good order. I was thinkimg of 325i running gear (I can buy that from Oze30 out of the 325i he bought yesterday) and a silver respray with subtle 17" alloys and a full retrim. Any thoughts?

Image

Re: Triumph 2500S

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 4:46 pm
by robbo86
Oh hell yeah, would love to see some Bavarian powered British Leyland car. Sounds awesome, ambitious, but do it!

Re: Triumph 2500S

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 4:51 pm
by Ollie_bwoii
Don't do it to a 2500, do it too a dolomite! winkeye

Re: Triumph 2500S

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:50 pm
by dave525
like it!be much more fun with a 540 engine though

Re: Triumph 2500S

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:07 pm
by town325i
that should get the old triumph moving a bit better with a real engine in it

Re: Triumph 2500S

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:43 pm
by B7
Blimey, thats a late one. M20 in it would make it a car BL should have made. These were always a nice car. The PI was a quick car in it's day....when they ran properly

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:55 pm
by StuBeeDoo
Nice car. :D I had an acquaintance many years ago who had a 2000 Estate with a Stag V8 in. :cool:

Re:

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:01 pm
by Jhonno
*Cough* M50 :)

Re:

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:50 pm
by csl
If you need any new bits ,my dad has some genuine BL (un-used) in his garage ! :D

Re:

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:30 pm
by robbo86
*Cough* M50
I was just about to suggest that. Or m52's with m50 throttle bodies!

Re:

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:20 am
by Splondike
Love those 2.5s particularly the S. Have seen them as late as S reg in the past. Maybe an M30 3.5 would be a good choice, would hustle that along nicely :)

Re:

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:43 am
by daimlerman
robbo86 wrote:
*Cough* M50
I was just about to suggest that. Or m52's with m50 throttle bodies!
Damn,beaten to the keyboard!! M50 is the way forward,be no more difficult!!

Re:

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:02 pm
by 78dude
Sounds good, to BMW powered this car would be cool as Everest!
Looking forward to see this porject starts and see how you do it! :D

Re:

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:19 pm
by Andyboy
Nothing wrong with the 2.5 Triumph engine, a good strong unit capable of good power. The only issue with the injection system was the fuel pump overheating, cheaply cured by fitting a standard Bosch pump.

I wouldn't modify it too much.

Re:

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:28 pm
by daimlerman
Andyboy wrote:Nothing wrong with the 2.5 Triumph engine, a good strong unit capable of good power. The only issue with the injection system was the fuel pump overheating, cheaply cured by fitting a standard Bosch pump.

I wouldn't modify it too much.
Not quite correct Mr Everrit,the seals in the OE injection system do not like unleaded,there is an improved seal available to get round the issue,but why stick with mechanical injection when something much better is available?

Re:

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:44 pm
by dave525
saw a car with this engine in at the classic car show.it had emerald management on it with electronic injectors in the standard throttle bodies.looked a really cool modern solution to the unleaded issue.would also require hardened valve seats i,d have thought though

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:30 pm
by Rodderz
A car that was horrible new can only be a horrible car now!

Re:

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:15 pm
by Andyboy
They were a decent enough car back in the day, but that was 30 years ago and the Triumph 2000 came out in '63. The last one was in '77, replaced by the Rover 2300 and 2600. They rot like buggery around the rear floor/suspension area which is a sod to do properly.

2500S isn't an injection one anyway - the ended in '74 when the TR6 went to carburettors. The S replaced it and manual versions have standard overdrive and PAS.

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:17 pm
by lance1a
This is what it looks like after the first major clean and machine. On closer inspection, it appears to be very well cared for in a previous life. All the tyres are Dunlops of similar wear, the window rubbers are either new or have seen little sun, a Kenlowe fan is fitted and other things that indicate a cosseted life.

There are a few bits that could do with a blow in here and there but nothing major, starts on the button, though the starter is a bit noisy now and then.

Pity it's sooooo fcuking ugly!

Image

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:27 pm
by beemerbird
I think it would look great re - sprayed in black. That would bring out all the chrome and make those wheels look like real features.

It's ugly because it is turd coloured, in my opinion :?

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:29 pm
by Jhonno
It's an awesome colour!

M50.. NOW! :twisted:

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:30 pm
by Splondike
Ugly ! 8O I really like them :cool:

As it is a goodun I would suggest getting the original 2.5 going properly seems a shame to turn a decent one into some hybrid / unfinished project.

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:29 pm
by lance1a
The motor runs very well and is still extremely smooth, in fact the only thing on the car that doesn't work is the electric aerial. There are no rattles even and I was genuinely shocked at how well it drives. :D

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:31 pm
by Cloud
The number plate looks like it's held on by magic.

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:37 pm
by Ollie_bwoii
+1 for the colour change!

Looks better than i'd thought! :cool:

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:48 pm
by ivqii
Rob am I right i saying that the 2500 didn't have power steering whereas perversely the 2000 did?

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:49 pm
by lance1a
No mate, well this one has power steering anyway.

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:51 pm
by edz2537
keep it as it is!!ive got an e30 and a 1972 rover 3500s,best of both worlds 8)

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:50 pm
by mattm
I think the engine swap would be a great idea but leave the exterior and wheels the same and make a sleeper! :cool:

Re:

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:58 pm
by Cloggy Saint
Cloud wrote:The number plate looks like it's held on by magic.
:D

It's not an ugly car, it looks great! even the colour's not that bad.

Re:

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 12:06 am
by E30BeemerLad
would the 4 pot turbo out of the classic shape Saab 900 turbo, which I believe has some Triumph heritage not bolt up to a/ the triumph bell housing?

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 12:15 am
by Elecblondie
StuBeeDoo wrote:Nice car. :D I had an acquaintance many years ago who had a 2000 Estate with a Stag V8 in. :cool:
Cool, I've got a friend with a Stag V8 powered Dolomite. 8)

Probably the worst cosmetic looking roadworthy car I know.

Engine

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 12:31 am
by Bewdley320T
Nothing wrong with that engine, I had a 2.5 PI and it went like sh*t off the shovel. Change up a gear at 105mph 30 years ago in a comfortable 5 seater wasn't hanging about i can assure you. As for the looks, its gorgeous; and never change the original colour (it was the fashion at the time).

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 12:33 am
by Bewdley320T
Elecblondie wrote:
StuBeeDoo wrote:Nice car. :D I had an acquaintance many years ago who had a 2000 Estate with a Stag V8 in. :cool:
Cool, I've got a friend with a Stag V8 powered Dolomite. 8)

Probably the worst cosmetic looking roadworthy car I know.
"STAG V8" now there's a crap engine if there ever was one, the only thing that killed the STAG.

Re: Engine

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:37 am
by ivqii
Bewdley320T wrote:Nothing wrong with that engine, I had a 2.5 PI and it went like sh*t off the shovel. Change up a gear at 105mph 30 years ago in a comfortable 5 seater wasn't hanging about i can assure you. As for the looks, its gorgeous; and never change the original colour (it was the fashion at the time).
Yup - loadsa BMC cars wore that colour - I had a 1972 Austin 1800 Landcrab in that or a very similar brown - the factory called it "Saddle Brown"