Need engine conversion from m20b20 because as you all agree it`s a no good engine fuel consumption wise and lacks punch so am considering m50`s.I aren`t bhp crazy but need a good balance of mpg and horses.Any one knows mpg of both these engines thats m50b20 and m50b25.I love the way bmw six pot engine sounds.Any advice wud be grately appreciated
Re: m50b20 or m50b25
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:31 am
by Cook318IS
The m50 520i and 525i have a big difference between them when the engines are still in them (not sure what they are like on fuel in e30s but the m50b20 in an e30 is disappointingly slow, you may as well get an m42!) but the 520i is slow and crap on fuel but the 525i is faster and better on fuel when they are in the e34.
Re: m50b20 or m50b25
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:48 am
by DanThe
Its the same as deciding between an M20B20 and an M20B25, dont even consider it, its not worth the effort
Re: m50b20 or m50b25
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:20 am
by b4db0y
M20b20 = 129 donkeys M50b20 = 150 horses M50b25 = 192 stallions so surely
they shud be a difference considering i love the way bmw 6 pot sounds, i would like
a fair horsepower and engine size so considering the cc involved the 25 looks like a
decent trade off.Mpg wise is it worth it swapping these engines over and have
heard horror nakasil stories bout m52 engines
Re: m50b20 or m50b25
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:21 am
by Cook318IS
nikisil issues arent as bad as they have been made out to sound imo. It was only the early m52 engines which had this problem. there was a recent thread actually discussing m50 vs m52