Page 1 of 1
Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:38 pm
by hillbilly30
So as above, fitted to my 318is on standard shocks, definitely gone down more on front than rear?? Haven't got any pics to show it but I would say rear has gone down 10mm and front has gone 35mm, is this normal?

Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:32 pm
by Brianmoooore
Are you sure you've seated the springs into the rubber pads correctly?
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:36 pm
by blondboy84
Brianmoooore wrote:Are you sure you've seated the springs into the rubber pads correctly?
I'm pretty sure that's the problem.
I have Eibachs on my 325 and no probs...
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:47 pm
by hillbilly30
Brianmoooore wrote:Are you sure you've seated the springs into the rubber pads correctly?
I think so, you talking about the rears? I've driven a few miles with them fitted so would have thought they would have seated by now? Do eibach do two different heights?
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 10:17 pm
by leeparkes
You could have touring/cab rear springs (heavier car on the rear)
Or a 60/40 drop (or both)
Is there any codes on the springs?
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:58 pm
by hillbilly30
I've removed one of the rears today and there is no difference in height between them and the old standard ones, any ideas people?
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:06 pm
by DanThe
Sounds like your old springs were overly compressed, for example, the car has been used for towing or had heavy loads in the boot for long periods of time
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:35 pm
by hillbilly30
Yea that sounds fair enough, the car has over 90k on it. Though I still can't understand why I'm getting the "rake" look with the set fitted?

It's not a great pic but I think the issue can be seen.
Is there anything else I can do to drop the rear?
Edit: no it's a crud pic and you can't see what I'm talking about

Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 9:28 pm
by rich318i
get the car 3 up plus driver 4 and take it out. It should settle
The front looks like mine on H&R's sports. On my rears 15 bbs are level with the front small amount of tyre under the arch
20mm drop i believe with the H&R all round
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 9:39 pm
by Dave_M3
Eibach springs give abit of a rake look anyway but it's only slight. personally, I like it
Your old springs could have been just very sagged as Dan says and now your just not used to how an E30 is suppose to sit
I'll see if I have any pics from the side when my iS was on the B12s
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 10:41 pm
by hillbilly30
This is the best example I can find of how my car sits

Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:41 pm
by Dave_M3
That's sitting perfectly in my opinion.
Even standard E30 318iS mtec springs have a nice rake to them.
This is how my other iS used sit on standard suspension

Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:46 am
by suedenim
hillbilly30 wrote:This is the best example I can find of how my car sits

This is how my 4 pot sits on Eibach 40/40, std dampers/15" wheels 55 profile tyres.
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 7:05 am
by hillbilly30
Will post pic of mine later today for judgment, Dave-m3 I think mine is similar to your pic on rear but is still lower on the front by maybe 25mm,
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 8:52 am
by Quaser
DanThe wrote:Sounds like your old springs were overly compressed, for example, the car has been used for towing or had heavy loads in the boot for long periods of time
probably loaded with subs init
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 3:32 pm
by hillbilly30
Well it's sorted! Stripped the whole thing down and then rebuilt. All seems well, not that I could see an issue before but it definitely sits better now
What do you think?
Thanks for all posts

Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:19 pm
by Brianmoooore
Brianmoooore wrote:Are you sure you've seated the springs into the rubber pads correctly?
Not much else it could be, if all you've done is taken it apart and put it back together.
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:20 pm
by Dave_M3
hillbilly30 wrote:Will post pic of mine later today for judgment, Dave-m3 I think mine is similar to your pic on rear but is still lower on the front by maybe 25mm,
Definitely something was wrong in how the springs were seating on the pads so then as mine had standard Mtec springs all round in that pic and iirc, I don't think I had the carpet, rear seats, boot trim and things in it when that photo was taken either was had that iS stripped out to make it a trackcar at the time.
My guess is the spring pads weren't sitting down around on the bump stops in the trailing arm an body properly.
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:43 am
by G-Bear
suedenim wrote:hillbilly30 wrote:This is the best example I can find of how my car sits

This is how my 4 pot sits on Eibach 40/40, std dampers/15" wheels 55 profile tyres.
As did mine..
Re: Eibach springs fitted, now lower on front than back?
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:38 pm
by Jamie8GTi
reading this post has me sold on the eibach springs! both those pictures look identical to my desired look!!
