Page 1 of 1
High comp or low comp??
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:25 pm
by oakey
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:58 pm
by e301988325i
Am I missing something Dave? That's clearly an E for early HC, K is later LC.
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 9:14 pm
by Simon13
high comp bert
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 9:19 pm
by fowler
Simon13 wrote:high comp bert
+1

oops
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:32 pm
by bss325i
According to realoem 256E2 is
from 9/87 on with no cat so i would say low comp.
256E1 is
upto 9/87 with no cat so i would say that is a high comp.
256K1 is
from 9/87 with a cat (the K in 256K1 is an abriviation for Katalysator which is german for catalitc converter so this will also be a low comp engine.
http://www.realoem.com/bmw/showparts.do ... g=11&fg=05
I will confirm this tomorrow.
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:41 pm
by Speedtouch
I gather all the 25 6E blocks are high compression. My 1988 F-reg 325iSE had one and it went like stink!

Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:58 pm
by bss325i
256E2
25 denotes the engine size
6 denotes the number of cylinders
E denotes engine concept with E being injection
2 denotes the differentiation index with 2 being the second, ie low comp as that came after 1, high comp.
See page four of this very usefull PDF file.
http://www.ge39.com/files/zeigeinfo.pdf
I guess thats squashed that myth!
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 6:48 am
by B7
bss325i wrote:256E2
25 denotes the engine size
6 denotes the number of cylinders
E denotes engine concept with E being injection
2 denotes the differentiation index with 2 being the second, ie low comp as that came after 1, high comp.
See page four of this very usefull PDF file.
http://www.ge39.com/files/zeigeinfo.pdf
I guess thats squashed that myth!
This needs clarifying? Everyones been led to believe 6E high comp. 6k low comp.
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:02 pm
by Speedtouch
bss325i wrote:256E2
25 denotes the engine size
6 denotes the number of cylinders
E denotes engine concept with E being injection
2 denotes the differentiation index with 2 being the second, ie low comp as that came after 1, high comp.
See page four of this very usefull PDF file.
http://www.ge39.com/files/zeigeinfo.pdf
I guess thats squashed that myth!
As interesting as that is, it doesn't specifically define 1 as high comp and 2 as low comp

Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:15 pm
by Jamese30
So who fancies dismantling their engines and doing a volume measurement..??
only joking...
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:32 pm
by oakey
Speedtouch wrote:bss325i wrote:256E2
25 denotes the engine size
6 denotes the number of cylinders
E denotes engine concept with E being injection
2 denotes the differentiation index with 2 being the second, ie low comp as that came after 1, high comp.
See page four of this very usefull PDF file.
http://www.ge39.com/files/zeigeinfo.pdf
I guess thats squashed that myth!
As interesting as that is, it doesn't specifically define 1 as high comp and 2 as low comp

Good point. Can you explain why you think the 1 and 2 will refer to the comp ratio?
What's the engine code on yours barry?
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:07 pm
by bss325i
Because the the E and the K refer to type, not compression ratio. E is for fuel injection and K is for catalytic converter (on M10, M20 and M30 only)
Its clearly states that on page 4 of that PDF file (of an official BMW document) in the link i posted.
The digit after E or K denotes the differentiation index, ie 1 being the first, 2 being the second.
256E1 = upto 9/87 non cat and of the first differentiation, ie high comp (9.4:1)
256E2 = from 9/87 non cat and of the second differentiation, ie low comp (8.8:1)
256K2 = from 9/87 cat (and i think cat prepped) and of the first differentiation, ie low comp (8.8:1)
I will have to check what mine is Dave but it think its 256K1, mine is cat prepped but doent have the cat itself.
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:56 pm
by Speedtouch
But how have you drawn the conclusion that the differentiation number refers specifically to compression ratio?
The document appears to make no validation on this, unless I missed something...
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:16 pm
by bss325i
Because the high comp came out before the low comp.
Something else has come to light that may throw this theory out.
More tomorrow.
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:27 pm
by Andyboy
Early ones are 9.75.1, later plakky bumper cars are either 9.4:1 or 8.8:1.
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:33 pm
by bss325i
Why do BMW state only two compression ratios for the M20B25
9.4:1 or 8.8:1?
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:18 pm
by Andyboy
They don't, they state three. 9.75 in the old chrome bumper version handbook and the other two in the later handbooks.
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:55 pm
by oakey
So the above engine number is that of a 9.4:1 comp ratio engine???
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:59 pm
by bss325i
Andy, i checked it out at work on BMW TIS. It only states 9.4:1 and 8.8:1.
I checked '85, '86, '87, '88, '89 etc.
No mention of 9.7:1.
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:12 pm
by Andyboy
Well, then TIS is wrong. The original 1985 owners handbook states 9.7, so does the original 325i technical bulletin from 1985 and I got a mate to check the Mahle piston catalogue which actually states 9.75 on early cars.
To check, I trawled through ETK and found three different slugs (standard bore Mahle)
Up to 9/87 11251708861 = this must be the 9.7
From 09/1987 to 06/1988 11251718924 = early plastic bumper, probably 9.4.
From 06/1988 11251735760 = Later plastic bumper, probably 8.8
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:56 pm
by Speedtouch
So, 25 6E1 probably refers to 9.75 CR while 25 6E2 is the 9.4 CR (presumably).
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:56 pm
by bss325i
You are right about three specific dates for pistons but interestingly on the etk it lists 3 different engines.
256E1 Up to 9/87 11001730858
But what is missleading is this, both engines are listed from 9/87, neither of them upto 6/88
256E2 From 9/87 11001730889
256K1 from 9/87 11001730862
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:59 pm
by bss325i
Speedtouch wrote:So, 25 6E1 probably refers to 9.75 CR while 25 6E2 is the 9.4 CR (presumably).
This is what its begining to look like i guess.
Strange that the most up to date version of BMW's TIS (Technical Information System) only mentions 9.4 and 8.8.
Conflicting data doesn't make things easy!
Re: High comp or low comp??
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:05 pm
by Speedtouch
Where's Ant when you need him? I'm sure he knows the definitive answer!