Page 1 of 1
low mileage tec 2
Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 10:39 am
by DANNYM
Re: low mileage tec 2
Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 12:05 pm
by Rtaylor2208
I wonder if that the claim that all the MOT's are there given that there is only 6 of them in the picture. And the speedo reads 76K but the description 67K.
For a low mileage car I would have expected the owner to have at least had it valeted prior to advertising. It doesn't really show it, at its best.
Re: low mileage tec 2
Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 12:15 pm
by gooner1
No, it says he bought the car in 2012 with 67,000 on the clock.
Not unreasonable to be reading 76,000 2 years later.
Though he could have made that a bit clearer.
Re: low mileage tec 2
Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 12:35 pm
by daimlerman
Wonder how good it looks with it's kit off?
Re: low mileage tec 2
Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 12:41 pm
by pony
Low owners and low mileage
Needs tidying up
The current bid is quite high
Is it me or is the 325i badge in the incorrect location and their are smoked front headlamps ?
Re: low mileage tec 2
Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 1:16 pm
by appletree
I might be wrong but in that pic of the roof it looks like it's got a scab of rust in the same location as mine had, at the front cod the roof between the tip of the screen and the sunroof panel, which means the roof will be fooked especially if it's been sat in a damp lock up....
Re: low mileage tec 2
Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 4:05 pm
by Rtaylor2208
appletree wrote:I might be wrong but in that pic of the roof it looks like it's got a scab of rust in the same location as mine had, at the front cod the roof between the tip of the screen and the sunroof panel, which means the roof will be fooked especially if it's been sat in a damp lock up....
Spotted that mark as well, but not sure if its just because the car was filthy.