Page 1 of 6
Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:08 pm
by BEERBOY123
I know E30s are not museum pieces and need to be used but I have to wonder about some of the horrible 'improvements' made to many of the cars proudly paraded on this site.
Can you imagine E-Type owners adding stupid spoilers, non-standard wheels, 'smoked' glass and all that rubbish to their cars? There seems to be a split between genuine E30 custodians and idiot boy racers on this site - of all sites.
The image of this modern classic is going to be tarnished if we're not careful. And while I'm ranting, the boy racers can't spell either.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:11 pm
by fuzzy
what about the older members who highly modify their cars and can spell to an acceptable standard?
dont worry about it. mock away when you fell the need. thats the joy of an internet forum.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:13 pm
by BEERBOY123
I see the older members' grammar and spelling is pretty poor too.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:19 pm
by BEERBOY123
Sorry, there was no need for that. I apologise: I'm no grammarian really. I just get annoyed about some of the revolting E30s on here, but I suppose beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that and no offence meant.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:21 pm
by da4x4turbo
BEERBOY123 wrote:I know E30s are not museum pieces and need to be used but I have to wonder about some of the horrible 'improvements' made to many of the cars proudly paraded on this site.
Can you imagine E-Type owners adding stupid spoilers, non-standard wheels, 'smoked' glass and all that rubbish to their cars? There seems to be a split between genuine E30 custodians and idiot boy racers on this site - of all sites.
The image of this modern classic is going to be tarnished if we're not careful. And while I'm ranting, the boy racers can't spell either.
Hey Dude,
Nice way to introduce yourself.... You'll go far.
Oh and I'll wager that several E-Types have been bastardised over the years; but it's a rarer car so not as widespread. Also it's not as contemporary; so there won't be as much rubbish available for them.
The e30 is fast becoming a very desirable classic car... watch this space. Or site in this case!
Regards,
Seany
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:22 pm
by E30BeemerLad
Nothing wrong with variety and tastes differ
That was painfully liberal of me wasn't it

Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:25 pm
by BEERBOY123
Yeah, sorry again. Should have engaged brain first. Having said that, there are some totally tasteless cars on here and the site does seem torn between Max Power and Classic and Sport.
I know what I prefer.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:30 pm
by Ziggy
BEERBOY123 wrote:
The image of this modern classic is going to be tarnished if we're not careful. And while I'm ranting, the boy racers can't spell either.
You sure? I certainly see less chavved up examples round here than a few years ago... That'll be natural selection in action I guess

Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:32 pm
by jamie325isport
I know what I prefer but each to their own. No point bitching on about it. What do you want everyone to do that hasnt got a car you like, change it back or leave the zone?
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:33 pm
by djk
It's a broad church, all are welcome to come and steal the wafers and neck the wine. I'm a 27 year old who likes a nice standard e30. I also have a beard, an English degree and a subscription to Classic and Sports Car, but don't tell anyone...
Best not to judge, I reckon.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:33 pm
by shedrool83
If you prefer the standard look just keep you car that way and let the boyracers as you put it do what they wont to their cars simple.
At the end of the day everybody has different taste.
Hope my spelling and grammer was ok

Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:35 pm
by Ollie_bwoii
E30's are getting into the right hands - Not to many counciled up F***ers!
E36's are sort of getting there - Few stunners but quite a lot are dogs!
E46's are getting counciled up more and more often as they become affordable!
E90's are still new and are all in pretty good original condition!
By the way this is just my opinion!
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:37 pm
by Felix79
As long as the owner is happy then I see no issue.
I know Magpie and I have very different tastes in what should be on a e30 but it does not mean I have any less respect for him as a zoner and there is actually more reason for us to chat about stuff due to us having different ideas.
Also how does driving attitudes have a reflection onto how well someone can spell or use grammer? I know I am defiantly not a boy racer but I know my spelling and grammer are shocking at the best of times.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:39 pm
by anisotropy
BEERBOY123 wrote:I know E30s are not museum pieces and need to be used but I have to wonder about some of the horrible 'improvements' made to many of the cars proudly paraded on this site.
Can you imagine E-Type owners adding stupid spoilers, non-standard wheels, 'smoked' glass and all that rubbish to their cars? There seems to be a split between genuine E30 custodians and idiot boy racers on this site - of all sites.
The image of this modern classic is going to be tarnished if we're not careful. And while I'm ranting, the boy racers can't spell either.

Is there even any point bothering to point out what crap you're talking. In what way can rare e-type jaguars be compared to a common cheap, rugged 80s beemer beloved for its reliabilty and RWD handling? Please stop inventing a 'split' in attitudes to the car -one of the best things about e30s is the lack of this 'split'.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:39 pm
by BEERBOY123
I accept all the above, I just get cross because good E30s are a finite resource. Having said that, the more that get modified and spolit, the more mine will be worth.
And I have twelve English degrees, so there.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:40 pm
by e30topless
BEERBOY123 wrote:Yeah, sorry again. Should have engaged brain first. Having said that, there are some totally tasteless cars on here and the site does seem torn between Max Power and Classic and Sport.
I know what I prefer.
you are probably right, but these 'types' come and go, the true enthusiasts will always remain ...
it is quite suprising how many 'young' zoners there are registered here with good taste and do keep their cars original

Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:44 pm
by jamie325isport
And I have twelve English degrees, so there.
So what? Who gives a shit!?
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:46 pm
by gazm3
Beerboy123,
May I ask, what model of jag you drive.
I must be a boy racer as I have the wrong wheels and smoked glass, my spoiler is standard.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:47 pm
by hennabm
When Escorts I & II reached a certain age, they too were "chavved up" to use a modern term. Currently the E30 is at that stage.
In time the council scrap will die and the good ones will remain. If any modifieds do survive, looking at other makes, then the likelihood is they will be returned to near std as they change hands in future years.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:47 pm
by shedrool83
jamie325isport wrote:And I have twelve English degrees, so there.
So what? Who gives a shit!?
Just what i was thinking

Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:48 pm
by anisotropy
If you have twelve English degrees (or even one or two) you should be more aware of the dangers of thinking in dichotomies. E30s range from straight from the factory to mad bodykit tat, they don't divide into original and spoilt.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:49 pm
by Ollie_bwoii
How the F*** do you have 12 degrees?
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:49 pm
by spook
I have today acquired 16 giant cans of expanding foam
I shall mostly be turning my touring into the Alpina varity this weekend
Had a stroke yet beerboy

Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:50 pm
by BEERBOY123
I feel like I'm getting hammered here- possibly quite rightly - for defending the E30.
Is this the E30 Zone or not? Have I taken a wrong turn?
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:50 pm
by djk
BEERBOY123 wrote:I accept all the above, I just get cross because good E30s are a finite resource. Having said that, the more that get modified and spolit, the more mine will be worth.
And I have twelve English degrees, so there.
You're really doing well at ingratiating yourself to this forum aren't you? There's no law against bad spelling or modifying cars - live and let live, or fuck off. It's a pretty simple choice.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:53 pm
by e30topless
spook wrote:I have today acquired 16 giant cans of expanding foam
I shall mostly be turning my touring into the Alpina varity this weekend
Had a stroke yet beerboy

don't forget to post pics spook

Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:53 pm
by anisotropy
BEERBOY123 wrote:I feel like I'm getting hammered here- possibly quite rightly - for defending the E30.
Is this the E30 Zone or not? Have I taken a wrong turn?
You are defending only your own limited conception of the e30. Thats the problem.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:53 pm
by Jon_Bmw
Was that not sarcasm? Mind you, being an iS owner, he could be that silly to do 12. Obviously, common sense wasn't on the sylabii as he parted with £3k for a rusty one.
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:54 pm
by Ollie_bwoii
My personal pride and joy! Is this what you like to see?

Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:55 pm
by jamie325isport
Ollie_bwoii wrote:My personal pride and joy! Is this what you like to see?

God no!! Wheres the fibreglass?
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:56 pm
by gazm3
Mondeo man
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:56 pm
by BEERBOY123
You're a touchy lot aren't you?
Flipping hell, chill out. I've said I mean no offence and that I accept all the comments above. Does nobody else get vexed about the bastardisation of this lovely car?
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:57 pm
by Kedge
BEERBOY123 = RoyalRatch by anychance?
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:57 pm
by Jon_Bmw
ZOMG olli, u need 2 chav that up. Were iz da 22 rimz and flipzor paint?
Re: Originality and good grammar vs the boy racer
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:58 pm
by Ollie_bwoii
Have to admit I don't like it when someone ruins an E30, But hey its there choice and car! Im happy with the E30 I own now!